Yes, let's hope that was the only time. She seemed to be obviously loved with that picture of her and her quilt though.Sadly it seems she was terribly abused though, let's hope her death was the only time it happened
Yes, let's hope that was the only time. She seemed to be obviously loved with that picture of her and her quilt though.Sadly it seems she was terribly abused though, let's hope her death was the only time it happened
it is odd for sure that no one connected the dots ...its such a distinct quiltI think the story received as much publicity there as anywhere else if this is anything to go by >>> http://www.ntnews.com.au/search-results?q=wynarka
But it still seems odd that nobody recognised the clothing o quilt, doesn't it?
"Investigators then located a witness who had seen Khandalyce and her mother at Marion Shopping Centre, Adelaide in November 2008. She had taken photos of Khandalyce wearing a pink dress. That dress is identical to that found with the remains in the suitcase.
Police were also provided with photos of Khandalyce in a stroller with the handmade quilt that was also found in the suitcase."
Yes, the image of the quilt with her in life and death - she was loved.
Sadly it seems she was terribly abused though, let's hope her death was the only time it happened
As far as I know, she was never abused. It was just that before we knew her name, no one could be sure what happened to her since she died a violent death. She could have been, but there was no proof of it.I have speed read through this thread once I saw Khandalyce had been identified and I missed where she was abused (outside of her obvious death) could you help me out and point me to where I need to catch up?
"The chemical markers that were in her tissue and bones indicated she had not spent much time in Australia," Detective Sergeant Tim Attwood told Fairfax Media.
As far as I know, she was never abused. It was just that before we knew her name, no one could be sure what happened to her since she died a violent death. She could have been, but there was no proof of it.
Now that we know who she is, and she was no doubt very much loved, it's nice to know she was more than likely not and I hope to God that she did not suffer long and her mother did not either before their deaths.
Yes, it is very surprising when we know them both as "Angel" and I remember there was a stage in our thread that people were confused which Angel we were talking about, extremely surprising they are in fact related! Extraordinary. Perhaps it was their clothing (mother's fashion taste) that made us think of Angel.
So the mystery now is this...
Mother and daughter were killed sometime in 2009 (probably) as the shopping centre photo was taken in Nov 2008.
Mother's body discovered in Belangalo Forest NSW in 2010.
Based on the age of the bones, her daughter died around the same time.
So why was the suitcase of the child's clothing kept?
Why was the child's body left to decompose at some other location (as police have previously stated) then the bones placed in the suitcase sometime later?
Why was the suitcase dumped 6 years later?
It seems to me that the killer would not have wanted the clothes and the bones together and could have easily dumped them separately so they would never be found.
Why keep the suitcase and the bones so long?
And then, why dump them?