Lol!I think she's been getting free guidance from here![]()
I think it's all proof of how obvious the inconsistencies are - to any people minded to think things through logically. (Like she herself, and her advisers and Websleuthers!)
Lol!I think she's been getting free guidance from here![]()
How does an innocent person do that, especially knowing they foraged the mushrooms and may have accidently picked death caps?
Sorry, it wasn't delivered. I don't think Door Dash would be too happy..!I guess you meant to type wasn't delivered by Door Dash.
Using a delivery service would have cooked her goose even more, so to speak.
She definitely would have told the medical staff if she had vomited. This is an afterthought from her. She's had plenty of time to think whilst in jail...'No evidence' vomiting would have minimised her symptoms
Dr Rogers told the jury Erin’s story about how much of her beef wellington portion she ate kept changing because she was trying to “manufacture an excuse” for why she wasn’t as ill as her guests.
Erin initially told medical staff she had eaten about half of her meal.
Her account later “shifted” to one-third or “even as little as a quarter”, Dr Rogers said.
“Even if you accept the accused’s claim that she only ate half, she still ate the same amount as Gail Patterson,” she said.
“We suggest you can readily see the accused is trying to manufacture an excuse … you should reject these attempts by her to minimise her (lack of symptoms).”
Dr Rogers said Erin’s account that she vomited after binge-eating cake must also be discounted.
“There is no evidence from any expert witness as to whether vomiting would prevent the absorption of the toxins and prevent her falling ill,” she said.
“Even if it’s likely to (do so), there is no evidence as to how soon after one would need to vomit for that to be effective.
“You simply have no evidence that the accused’s claim that she vomited would, or even might, have prevented her from falling ill.”
Dr Rogers also reminded the jury Erin had failed to tell any medical staff that she had vomited.
“The whole reason for her being (in hospital) centred around what she had consumed and whether she had symptoms such as nausea or diarrhoea,” she said.
“We suggest if she had truly vomited, that is a detail she would have shared with medical staff.
“The fact she didn’t should cause you to seriously reject this claim.”
Sorry, it wasn't delivered. I don't think Door Dash would be too happy..!
Their integrity is beyond anything I have seen in the media about them. They were literal saints. I mean that seriously as an atheist.
They volunteered in Botswana back in the late 70s and early 80s when flights were super expensive and nobody could afford to do aid work with their own funding - as missionaries to teach the African children English.
They held regular Saturday zoom calls with all of the cousins to catch up about their weeks.
Don taught Erins son physics and maths as a tutor. They volunteered their time to social causes.
Gail held regular "garden exploration" treasure hunts for the grandchildren and taught them about different plants and the cycle of nature.
They were not typical "Evangelical Christians" with a right-wing agenda (like we see the radicals in the USA). They always spoke about equality between men and women and poor and wealthy and different races, gay and straight. They were truly amazing people.
They took in children who didn't have parents.
They were aghast at displays of wealth and privilege and lived a very humble frugal life. They gave so much to their community - a global community.
It is an absolute travesty, IMO.
And also neglected to tell them she had taken Immodium.She definitely would have told the medical staff if she had vomited. This is an afterthought from her. She's had plenty of time to think whilst in jail...
Have just been considering the phenomenal amount of investigative work that the police have done to bring charges against EP.
In many ways, through her own stupidity, she made it fairly easy for them, but it all has to be done and documented to the prosecution's requirements.
I opined at the start of the trial that this would be a tech-heavy case and hoped that the jurors did not get lost in it all. I think Dr Rogers has done a great job of laying it all out in bite size chunks (pun intended).
And also neglected to tell them she had taken Immodium.
I was thinking, the other day, that for all the good they have done in this world their horrific, painful deaths and near-death were extremely unjust.
IMO, it demonstrates NPD revenge with a good dose of psychopathy.