12:58
Patterson told the jury she led her guests to believe she needed medical treatment.
But Patterson also admitted lying to her guests, telling the jury she was 'embarrassed' about her weight issues.
Mr Mandy said Patterson said she had tried to communicate she was undergoing 'investigations' about ovarian cancer.
The jury was reminded Mr Wilkinson gave evidence that Patterson told them she had some sort of cancer.
Mr Wilkinson said they discussed a diagnostic test which showed a spot on the scan that indicated cancer.
'Patterson wanted advice on how to tell the children,' Mr Wilkinson previously told the jury.
However, Mr Mandy said Mr Wilkinson had earlier told police Patterson said she 'suspected' she had cancer and they didn't discuss any type of treatment.
Mr Mandy went through Mr Wilkinson's evidence again with the jury.
'She named a type of cancer,' Mr Mandy said Mr Wilkinson had said.
Mr Mandy said Patterson told the truth at the trial about what she had said and done at the lunch.
13:02
He reminded the jury the conversation happened after Patterson and her guests had all eaten lunch.
'If this was a ruse there was no need to have the conversation, because the deed … the consumption of food had already happened,' Mr Mandy said.
'On the Crown case her objective had already been achieved.'
Mr Mandy said the lie about cancer had 'absolutely nothing to do' with allegedly killing them.
'There’s no point telling them the story after they'd eaten the food,' Mr Mandy said.
Mr Mandy said the prosecution's notion Patterson believed the lunch guests would take her cancer claim story to the grave was an 'illogical and irrational theory'.
Mr Mandy said the only conclusion the jury could draw was Patterson lied about having cancer.
www.dailymail.co.uk
Evidence of surviving lunch guest picked apart
Mr Mandy has suggested the evidence of surviving guest pastor Ian Wilkinson (pictured right) and that of Patterson about what was discussed at the lunch was 'was not far apart'.Patterson told the jury she led her guests to believe she needed medical treatment.
But Patterson also admitted lying to her guests, telling the jury she was 'embarrassed' about her weight issues.
Mr Mandy said Patterson said she had tried to communicate she was undergoing 'investigations' about ovarian cancer.
The jury was reminded Mr Wilkinson gave evidence that Patterson told them she had some sort of cancer.
Mr Wilkinson said they discussed a diagnostic test which showed a spot on the scan that indicated cancer.
'Patterson wanted advice on how to tell the children,' Mr Wilkinson previously told the jury.
However, Mr Mandy said Mr Wilkinson had earlier told police Patterson said she 'suspected' she had cancer and they didn't discuss any type of treatment.
Mr Mandy went through Mr Wilkinson's evidence again with the jury.
'She named a type of cancer,' Mr Mandy said Mr Wilkinson had said.
Mr Mandy said Patterson told the truth at the trial about what she had said and done at the lunch.
13:02
Prosecution theory slammed as 'illogical'
Mr Mandy has asked what would be the point of talking about cancer after Patterson's guests had eaten the food served at the lunch.He reminded the jury the conversation happened after Patterson and her guests had all eaten lunch.
'If this was a ruse there was no need to have the conversation, because the deed … the consumption of food had already happened,' Mr Mandy said.
'On the Crown case her objective had already been achieved.'
Mr Mandy said the lie about cancer had 'absolutely nothing to do' with allegedly killing them.
'There’s no point telling them the story after they'd eaten the food,' Mr Mandy said.
Mr Mandy said the prosecution's notion Patterson believed the lunch guests would take her cancer claim story to the grave was an 'illogical and irrational theory'.
Mr Mandy said the only conclusion the jury could draw was Patterson lied about having cancer.

Erin Patterson mushroom murder trial LIVE updates
Follow Daily Mail Australia's live coverage of accused mushroom chef Erin Patterson's murder trial here.