VERDICT WATCH Australia - 3 dead after eating wild mushrooms, Leongatha, Victoria, Aug 2023 #16 *Arrest*

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #181
1m ago

We return to the health department investigation​


By Mikaela Ortolan​

A transcript from earlier evidence is read to the jury, where the health department's Sally Ann Atkinson said Erin Patterson cited Oakleigh, Clayton and Glen Waverley as areas where she may have bought the dried mushrooms from an Asian grocer.

A health department investigation found it "highly unlikely" that a commercial supply of mushrooms became contaminated by amatoxins.

Justice Beale then touches on Ms Atkinson's notes.

He reminds the jury she would take "scribble notes" before transferring them into a typed document within an hour or so.

She would then transfer notes from this document into something called the Public Health Event Surveillance System.

 
  • #182
If I was a juror there a lot of things that I couldn't overlook or would need to really question.......

This is a very comprehensive list----how many of the above issues were successfully rebutted by the defense?

1. The wiping if her phone multiple times & providing police with phone B
What was her defense for this? The only one that comes to mind was her mocking them for not taking it off wifi immediately.

And the defense seems to try denying it actually happened, saying they never let her alone during the search etc.
2. Not being concerned about her kids & lying about serving them leftovers with the mushrooms scrapped off
I don't think that successfully refuted this point about her lack of concern NOR the point about her trying to claim she served them scraped off leftovers and then walked it back. She lied either way we look at it.
3. Her not getting sick from eating the same meal.
They worked really hard to refute this.

Maybe a few could buy the " I vomited" excuse, or " I barely ate much of it" excuse---but the severity of the illness seen in the other guests was so much greater, it's hard to ignore.
4. Her reluctance to get medical Rx even after being told in no uncertain times that her life was at risk & still leaving the hospital for an extended period of time, discharging against medical advice.

Her defence was " I always check out of treatment " and do the same with my kids.

Is that going to be enough to rebut this?
5. No concern for her "loved " & dying relatives ( ie not asking how they were )
I think that was even more highlighted in her long testimony---she showed no concern, remorse or compassion towards the victims.
6. Ignoring calls from people trying to get information on the lunch ( the health dept )
I don't think they defended that well.
7. The Asian Grocer
They didn't rebut that well either. IMO. They seemed to double down on it and insist she was telling the truth about that. A big mistake, imo.
8. Where is phone A?
I think that is a big problem but will the jury? It might be written off as unresolved or confusing?
9. Lied about the dehydrator.
One of her biggest problems. I don't think her defense that she panicked is working that well. ?
10. Her lies about gastric bypass / liposuction ( while on the stand )
I think that is very incriminating and I don't think they successfully refuted it. But who knows?
11. Lied about foraging
Still a big problem for her because on one hand they spent time convincing us how she loved to eat wild mushrooms and had books on it and did it with her kids and at same time she lied about it at every opportunity when the victims were ill.
12. Images of ?death caps on her own scales ( mycologist said they looked like death caps?)
A big problem still
13. The different plates
It may be nullified because of the confusion?
14. Lied that her phone number ended in 835 during her police interview ( gave them the factory re-set phone B )
Hope the jury picked up on that.
15. iNaturalist search's
A win for the prosecution in that she admitted she probably did that search---but sAys it was to look at death caps as precaution---so either way it hurts her. imo

Either she was searching for DCs or she was learning how to avoid them----so how did sh nd up saving them to her guests?
16 Knew all along she had that tupperware container of foraged mushrooms & that she added it to the meal ( without tasting after she said she added them as the meal was bland )

Bad news for her and the defense barely touched upon that
17. The toilet stop on the side of the road
I don't think they successfully convinced anyone that happened
18. Why she went into the servo toilet for 9 secs only
It's still a mystery but doesn't help her story about having gastro issues that day
19. Lying about cancer to lure the lunch guests
The defense worked long and hard to try and destroy the prosecution's claim that she lured her guests using the cancer lie----but I don't think they were successful because her next lie about having a 'scheduled bariatric surgery for September' blew all of it up, imo
20. Her disposition on the stand
I wish we could have seen it. The defense claims she withstood cross examination flawlessly with no problems... :rolleyes:
I don't think that there is an “reasonable, innocent explanation” as the defense claims to all these points!
This is a very comprehensive list----how many of the above issues were successfully rebutted by the defense? It seems like only a few of them were clearly refuted, IMO.
 
  • #183
Why would you dehydrate already dehydrated mushrooms bought from anyone? And how convenient that the packaging is non-existent. And why use mushrooms that smell funny in any dish rather than throw them out??? Why store them? That won't make the smell go away.
They smell funny and are too pungent so your next step is to place them into a Tupperware container and put them into the cabinet? Wouldn't that intensify the door?
 
  • #184
3m ago

More on the store location, and a quick break​


By Mikaela Ortolan​

The judge reminds the jury that health department officials located dried mushrooms in Oakleigh that matched the packaging description Erin Patterson gave.

Justice Beale says the department's Sally Ann Atkinson gave evidence that Ms Patterson was "never precise" about the location of the store and it wasn't until their third conversation that she first mentioned Glen Waverley.

Ms Patterson was asked to look at some maps during the investigation, but struggled to remember the location of the store, the jury heard.

We take a break, with the judge indicating he will turn to the evidence of child protection officer Katrina Cripps when the hearing resumes.

 
  • #185
1m ago

We return to the health department investigation​

By Mikaela Ortolan​

A transcript from earlier evidence is read to the jury, where the health department's Sally Ann Atkinson said Erin Patterson cited Oakleigh, Clayton and Glen Waverley as areas where she may have bought the dried mushrooms from an Asian grocer.

A health department investigation found it "highly unlikely" that a commercial supply of mushrooms became contaminated by amatoxins.

Justice Beale then touches on Ms Atkinson's notes.

He reminds the jury she would take "scribble notes" before transferring them into a typed document within an hour or so.

She would then transfer notes from this document into something called the Public Health Event Surveillance System.

This is important evidence. It’s Ms Atkinson’s whole job to get the information correct regarding shop location. IIRC didn’t the defence try to claim she made a mistake?
 
  • #186
Also she supposedly paid cash- untraceable, and can't remember the exact store- because it'd be disproven.
The exact store? She can't even remember which town. She named several towns she could have purchased them in.
But she does remember how the packaging looked and how they smelled.
 
  • #187
The exact store? She can't even remember which town. She named several towns she could have purchased them in.
But she does remember how the packaging looked and how they smelled.
And NO ONE else got sick .............maybe they all have them stashed in their tupperware containers ....still :rolleyes:
 
  • #188
14m ago11.30 AEST
Beale turns to the evidence of Department of Health official Sally Ann Atkinson. She testified that Patterson told her on 2 August 2023 she could not remember the Asian grocer she bought the dried mushrooms from. But she pointed to possible suburbs – Oakleigh, Clayton or Mount Waverley.

She said she originally purchased them for a pasta dish but when she opened them she noticed a funny smell and opted to not use them.

Atkinson said Patterson later mentioned Glen Waverley on 3 August 2023 as a possible suburb where the Asian grocer was located. Atkinson said this was the first time Patterson mentioned Glen Waverely, the court hears.

 
  • #189
This is a very comprehensive list----how many of the above issues were successfully rebutted by the defense?


What was her defense for this? The only one that comes to mind was her mocking them for not taking it off wifi immediately.

And the defense seems to try denying it actually happened, saying they never let her alone during the search etc.

I don't think that successfully refuted this point about her lack of concern NOR the point about her trying to claim she served them scraped off leftovers and then walked it back. She lied either way we look at it.

They worked really hard to refute this.

Maybe a few could buy the " I vomited" excuse, or " I barely ate much of it" excuse---but the severity of the illness seen in the other guests was so much greater, it's hard to ignore.


Her defence was " I always check out of treatment " and do the same with my kids.

Is that going to be enough to rebut this?

I think that was even more highlighted in her long testimony---she showed no concern, remorse or compassion towards the victims.

I don't think they defended that well.

They didn't rebut that well either. IMO. They seemed to double down on it and insist she was telling the truth about that. A big mistake, imo.

I think that is a big problem but will the jury? It might be written off as unresolved or confusing?

One of her biggest problems. I don't think her defense that she panicked is working that well. ?

I think that is very incriminating and I don't think they successfully refuted it. But who knows?

Still a big problem for her because on one hand they spent time convincing us how she loved to eat wild mushrooms and had books on it and did it with her kids and at same time she lied about it at every opportunity when the victims were ill.

A big problem still

It may be nullified because of the confusion?

Hope the jury picked up on that.

A win for the prosecution in that she admitted she probably did that search---but sAys it was to look at death caps as precaution---so either way it hurts her. imo

Either she was searching for DCs or she was learning how to avoid them----so how did sh nd up saving them to her guests?


Bad news for her and the defense barely touched upon that

I don't think they successfully convinced anyone that happened

It's still a mystery but doesn't help her story about having gastro issues that day

The defense worked long and hard to try and destroy the prosecution's claim that she lured her guests using the cancer lie----but I don't think they were successful because her next lie about having a 'scheduled bariatric surgery for September' blew all of it up, imo

I wish we could have seen it. The defense claims she withstood cross examination flawlessly with no problems... :rolleyes:

This is a very comprehensive list----how many of the above issues were successfully rebutted by the defense? It seems like only a few of them were clearly refuted, IMO.
I'll volunteer to take on #4 for starters. I don't think "I always check out of medical treatment/distrust the medical system" applies when you sought out the treatment for "gastro" and they've advised you that you are checking out AGAINST MEDICAL ADVICE (AMA) because you and your children may have been exposed to a potentially deadly toxin and you just need to pack your daughter's bag and feed/care for your animals cuts it.
Also if your distrust of the medical system is so great, why are you booking voluntary/cosmetic medical procedures for weight loss???
 
Last edited:
  • #190

37 minutes ago

Returning to the topic of 'incriminating conduct'
Justice Beale has returned to the topic of incriminating conduct.
Yesterday, he told the jury the prosecution alleges that Erin:
* Lied about being unwell and faked death cap mushroom poisoning;
* Lied about using dried mushrooms from an Asian grocer;
* Refused treatment on her first presentation to hospital and discharged herself against medical advice;
* Was reluctant to accept treatment on her second presentation to hospital;
* Was reluctant to obtain treatment for her children;
* Lied about feeding her children the leftovers of the beef wellington with the mushrooms and pastry scraped off;
* Reset Phone B, a phone she handed to police, multiple times;
* Disposed of her dehydrator at the local tip;
* Provided police Phone B, instead of Phone A, her usual phone;
* Lied about her phone number ending in 835 during her record of interview; and
* Lied about never having foraged for mushrooms and never having owned a dehydrator.

Justice Beale has started summarising the evidence relating to Erin allegedly lying about using dried mushrooms from an Asian grocer in the beef wellington meal.
 
  • #191
One of her biggest problems. I don't think her defense that she panicked is working that well. ?
She panicked over 3 days , but really she was just being a smart A to see what would happen.............

Attention turns to phone factory resets​


By Mikaela Ortolan​

We're now looking at a number of factory resets that were carried out on a phone connected to Erin Patterson, which was referred to during the trial as Phone B.

Justice Beale tells the jury the resets occurred on:

  • February 12, 2023 at 3:53am
  • August 2, 2023 at 9:09pm
  • August 5, 2023 at 11:20pm (when the phone was in police custody)
  • August 6, 2023 at 3:16pm (when the phone was still in police custody)
Mr Fox-Henry told the court the first three factory resets were done "locally", meaning the person carrying out the resets had the phone in their physical possession.

He also said factory resets are irreversible and destroy the data on the phone, and can be carried out in a number of ways.

 
  • #192

Alleged incriminating conduct- the Asian grocer and dried mushrooms​

Justice Beale has taken the jury back to witness evidence pertaining to Patterson’s alleged lying about the source of the mushrooms used in the beef wellington.

He recapped testimony from various medical professionals who told the court Patterson said she purchased some of the mushrooms used in the dish from an Asian grocer in Melbourne.

He said Matthew Patterson gave evidence that he rang Patterson to ask her where she bought the mushrooms, and she told him Woolworths and an Asian shop in the Oakleigh area.

Justice Beale also referred to testimony from public health officer Sally Ann Atkinson and a child protecction worker.

In Atkinson’s evidence, she said Patterson told her she was going to use the dried mushrooms in an earlier dish, but decided not to because they “smelt funny”.

Atkinson said she had made several efforts to follow up with Patterson but had difficulty contacting her and, when they spoke, she was “never precise” about the location of the Asian grocer.

Atkinson also said Patterson didn’t mention Glen Waverley as a possible location for the store until their third conversation.

The child protection worker told the court Atkinson asked her to help facilitate a call to Patterson, which she did when she went to the mother-of-two’s home in early August.

The child protection worker said she heard Patterson telling Atkinson about the dried mushrooms, including a description of the label, where she believed she bought them, and her decision to not use them in an earlier meal.

The child protection worker said she asked Patterson if she foraged the mushrooms used in the meal and she didn’t respond, instead gazing out the window and looking at her phone.

Justice Beale also ran the jury through evidence from plant virologist Dr David Lovelock, who found DNA for white button mushrooms in the lunch leftovers the presence of death cap mushrooms in the food dehydrator.

Justice Beale noted Dr Lovelock said the tests found the presence of a second mushroom species in the leftovers, but further testing was required to identify it, which was turned down by police.

The court heard the unidentified species was not death cap mushrooms, as they would have been identified as such during the initial testing.
By Tita Smith

1 hour ago

 
  • #193
11:54

Patterson didn't answer health department foraging question​

Justice Beale is telling the jury about Patterson's meeting with child welfare officer Katrina Cripps (pictured) at her Leongatha home on August 2.
Ms Cripps gave evidence she overheard a phone conversation between Patterson and Ms Atkinson which took place while she was present.
The jury heard Ms Cripps said she heard Patterson say she planned to use the dried mushrooms in a carbonara but they had a 'very strong smell', so she put them into the Tupperware container.
Ms Cripps also overheard Patterson say she put the dried mushrooms in the beef Wellingtons because 'they wouldn't be the primary flavour'.
Justice Beale also said Patterson did not answer a question about if the mushrooms were foraged.
Ms Cripps said Patterson had been 'looking at her phone and simply didn't answer' when Ms Atkinson asked the foraging question.


12:03

Expert evidence under the microscope​

Justice Beale moves to the evidence of expert witness Dr David Lovelock who examined the seized beef Wellington leftovers.
The jury heard Dr Lovelock discussed how 'DNA barcoding' was used to identify if death caps were in the samples.
Images of the leftovers, including samples of the mushrooms, were again shown to the jury.
Justice Beale said DNA testing found white button mushrooms and beef but also detected death caps in the leftovers.

 
  • #194
13m ago

Turning now to an overheard conversation​


By Mikaela Ortolan​

The jury is back in the courtroom.

As promised, Justice Beale turns to evidence given by Katrina Cripps.

The child protection officer gave evidence that during her first conversation with Erin Patterson, the accused said she purchased pre-sliced mushrooms from a supermarket and dried mushrooms from an Asian grocer in either Oakleigh or Clayton. This conversation took place while Ms Patterson was in hospital.

In her evidence, Ms Cripps mentioned a conversation she overheard between Ms Patterson and Sally Ann Atkinson from the health department, where the accused told Ms Atkinson that she couldn't recall where she purchased the dried mushrooms.

She said she overheard Ms Patterson tell Ms Atkinson she was going to use the dried mushrooms in a carbonara but they had a strong smell. Ms Patterson reportedly said she put the dried mushrooms in the beef Wellingtons because they wouldn't be the primary flavour.

Later, Ms Cripps asked if Ms Patterson had picked the mushrooms that were used in the lunch, but she did not answer her.

 
  • #195
6m ago12.01 AEST
Beale says child protection worker Katrina Cripps testified that she first spoke to Patterson on 1 August 2023.

Cripps said Patterson told her she bought fresh mushrooms from Woolworths and dried mushrooms from an Asian grocer in Oakleigh or Clayton. When asked on 2 August 2023 if she had picked the mushrooms used in the beef wellington meal, Patterson was looking at her phone and did not reply, Cripps said.

Beale reminds the jury of evidence from Dr David Lovelolock, a virologist at Agriculture Victoria in August 2023 who analysed leftovers of the beef wellington meal.

Lovelock said death cap mushrooms were found in two out of seven test tube samples containing substance from a dehydrator dumped by Patterson in the days after the mushroom lunch.

 
  • #196
12:10

Patterson's 'confusion' when doctor told her death caps may have been in the lunch​

Justice Beale has now turned to the evidence of Patterson.
Justice Beale said Patterson claimed she bought the dried mushrooms in April but she thought they didn't smell right and put them in a container which remained in her pantry at her Gibson St home.
Justice Beale said Patterson dehydrated mushrooms in May 2023 and placed them in a container that had other mushrooms in it.
On July 31, when Patterson arrived at hospital, she claimed the doctors had been expecting her.
The jury heard Patterson believed Dr Chris Webster (pictured) asked her where the ingredients for the lunch came from and she said 'Woolies'.
Patterson gave evidence she 'expressed confusion' that death caps could have been in the lunch when informed by Dr Webster.
Patterson also confirmed she told her brother-in-law Matthew Patterson the mushrooms came from Woolies and an Asian grocer.


12:11

Patterson's secret mushroom muffins​

Justice Beale has reminded the jury about discussions Patterson's daughter had with police.
The jury heard Patterson's daughter had liked muffins that the accused had secretly hid mushrooms in.
Patterson ground up mushrooms and baked them in muffins which she gave to her daughter, the jury was previously told.

 
  • #197
2m ago

Evidence on death cap testing​


By Mikaela Ortolan​

The trial was told that samples were taken from the lunch leftovers and a dehydrator that was recovered from the tip, with DNA extracted and barcoded.

Dr David Lovelock, who specialises in plant virology and bacteriology, was advised by Victoria Police to look for death cap mushrooms.

"The only thing we found [from the leftover samples] was DNA for white button mushrooms," Justice Beale reads from a transcript of his evidence.

"And they also found beef," he adds.

The judge reminds the jury that an interim report indicated a second mushroom species was detected. Police told Dr Lovelock not to worry about this species.

But the samples from the dehydrator returned a different result, the trial heard.

Justice Beale reminds the jury that two of seven test tubes from the dehydrator samples detected amanita phalloides — or death cap mushrooms.

 
  • #198
From yesterday


yesterday 3.52pm

Jury not required to accept expert opinions: ‘You are the judges’​

By​

Justice Christopher Beale started his instructions on Tuesday by clarifying with the jury that the defence relies on the fact that there is no evidence that accused killer Erin Patterson accessed iNaturalist, the citizen scientist website, in April or May 2023.

Beale turned to the evidence from digital forensics officer Shamen Fox-Henry, employed by Victoria Police, regarding information downloaded from a Cooler Master computer allegedly connected to Patterson that was found in her son’s bedroom.

Beale said Fox-Henry extracted data from the computer, using the words death cap, mushrooms and poison as part of his investigation. Fox-Henry agreed he did not have training on one particular piece of software he used (Magnet Axiom), instead turning to instructions from his colleagues.

Beale said Fox-Henry “selected all” contents for download but did not investigate them himself, instead handing a copy of his find to homicide squad detectives.

Fox-Henry also gave evidence about finding the device had accessed the iNaturalist website in May 2022, around the same time it also accessed a website for the Korumburra Middle Hotel.

Beale said that while Patterson was under cross-examination, she agreed that Fox-Henry gave evidence about the Cooler Master computer accessing an iNaturalist map for death cap mushrooms. The accused said she did not remember doing it, but agreed it could be her, and also maintained she did not use the browsers Internet Explorer or Bing, which were allegedly used to access the website.

Beale said Fox-Henry’s team also extracted data from a Samsung tablet seized from Patterson’s house. On it were images of mushrooms and a dehydrator, but Fox-Henry said he was unable to say on what device the photographs were taken or if the user received them from others, or how long they’d been associated with the device.

Phone evidence given by the prosecuction regarding a missing phone that was never found​

PHONE 1: Samsung Galaxy – called the “A23” phone – found in son’s bedroom cupboard during August 5, 2023 search warrant.

PHONE 2: Samsung Galaxy – called “Phone A” – seen with Erin Patterson in footage taken from CCTV cameras at Leongatha Hospital. Pink case. Never found.

PHONE 3: Samsung Galaxy – called “Phone B” – physically handed to police during a search warrant on August 5, 2023. Orange/red case.

PHONE 4: Nokia smartphone. The SIM card from “Phone A” was allegedly put into this phone during the house raid on August 5, 2023 – at 1.45pm – and used afterwards.

A third device allegedly connected to the accused which Fox-Henry analysed, known as phone B, was found to have been reset four times in 2023: on February 23, August 2, August 3 and August 6. The first three resets were done physically and the fourth remotely, Beale said. He confirmed that no data was obtained from that phone.

“You are not required to accept the opinions of [phone tower expert] Dr [Matthew] Sorell or Mr Fox-Henry. Or, indeed, expert opinions of the other experts who gave evidence. You are the judges of the facts,” Beale said.

“When assessing an expert’s opinion, you should consider their qualifications and experience.”

 
  • #199
11.04am

What happens during the judge’s charge?​

By​

Welcome to our coverage of day 38 of the triple murder trial of accused mushroom cook Erin Patterson in Morwell, in which Justice Christopher Beale is continuing his judge’s charge for a third day.

In a criminal jury trial, a judge’s charge is their final instructions to the jury about what they need to consider when they begin their verdict deliberations. They also summarise the main arguments of the defence and prosecution, highlighting key evidence from the trial.

Patterson has pleaded not guilty to murdering her in-laws, Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail’s sister, Heather Wilkinson, by serving them death cap mushrooms in a beef Wellington lunch at her Leongatha home on Saturday, July 29, 2023. Her in-laws and Wilkinson died in the days after the meal from the effects of mushroom poisoning. Heather’s husband, Ian Wilkinson, survived after weeks in hospital.

The judge’s instructions cover a range of topics, including relevant law, the jury’s responsibilities, and the elements of an offence that must be met to reach a guilty verdict.

In the case of murder, the legal bar the prosecution must reach is beyond reasonable doubt.

Beale said there would be three parts to his charge.

“First, I will give you directions regarding the principles of law which apply to this case. Some you have heard already, others will be new to you. You must apply all these principles of law carefully,” he said.

“Secondly, I will tell you the issues that you need to decide and will summarise: (a) the evidence that relates to those issues, and (b) the arguments made by the prosecution and defence in relation to those issues.

“Now, as you more than anyone will appreciate, there has been a great deal of evidence in this case and a lot of arguments made to you by the prosecution and defence.”

Beale said his summary would not cover all the evidence and arguments, reiterating to the jury that the fact he does not mention some evidence does not mean that that evidence is unimportant.

“Similarly, the fact that I include certain evidence does not make that evidence more important than other evidence. You must consider all of the evidence, not just the parts of it that I mention.

“In part three of my charge, I will give you further directions regarding the requirement that your verdicts must be unanimous and the procedure that will follow when receiving your verdicts.”

At the end of part three of the charge, Beale will reduce the number of jurors from 14 to 12 using a ballot system.

11.16am

How long until the jury begins deliberating?​

By​

Justice Christopher Beale began his charge on Tuesday, after the prosecution and defence teams made closing addresses to the jury last week.

The jury has been told the judge’s charge will continue for a few more days.

“I’ll be completing my charge prior to lunchtime on Monday,” Beale said.

Beale said the jury will not be sequestered until then.

From Monday, they will stay in accommodation after hours until they reach a verdict.

11.57am

Patterson’s alleged incriminating conduct​

By​

Justice Christopher Beale begins to take the jury through a list of the alleged incriminating conduct relating to accused mushroom cook Erin Patterson, which the prosecution is relying on.

Patterson’s alleged incriminating conduct​

  1. Lied about being unwell
  2. Lied about using dried mushrooms from an Asian grocery in the beef Wellingtons served at the fatal lunch on Saturday, July 29, 2023
  3. Refused treatment on her first presentation at Leongatha Hospital and left against medical advice
  4. Reluctant to receive treatment on her second presentation at the hospital
  5. Reluctant to obtain medical treatment for her children
  6. Lied that she fed her children leftovers from the beef Wellingtons – with the mushroom paste scraped off – on the evening of Sunday, July 30, 2023
  7. Reset phone B multiple times from August 2, 2023
  8. Disposed of a dehydrator at the local tip on August 2, 2023
  9. Gave police phone B on August 5 instead of her usual phone, phone A, which has never been recovered
  10. Lied in a police interview on August 5, 2023 that her phone number ended in 835 when it ended with three different digits; lied that she had never foraged for mushrooms; lied that she had never dehydrated food; and lied about not ever owning a dehydrator, including years ago
“The prosecution argues the only reasonable explanation for her unwillingness to receive emergency treatment … is that she knew she hadn’t consumed death cap mushrooms because she had deliberately poisoned her guests … making sure she also did not consume toxins,” Beale said.

“Defence says … she found it difficult to accept she may have suffered death cap mushroom poisoning. She had not come prepared to be admitted overnight. She needed to make arrangements for the children and the animals … and was intending to return [to hospital].”

 
  • #200
12:17

Moment Patterson allegedly realised death caps may have been in her lunch​

Justice Beale has reminded the jury about the alleged comment Patterson claimed Simon (pictured) said to her while the pair spoke at hospital.
Patterson gave evidence she told Simon about her dehydrator and he asked if it was the dehydrator 'you used to poison my parents'.
The jury heard it was a comment Patterson claimed made her feel worried and she feared she could be blamed for poisoning her guests.
Patterson gave evidence she came to the realisation that death caps might have been in the meal due to her foraging.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
93
Guests online
1,660
Total visitors
1,753

Forum statistics

Threads
632,466
Messages
18,627,184
Members
243,162
Latest member
detroit_greene915
Back
Top