I'm going to guess, verdict about 10.30 am today.
Positive thinking I like it

I'm going to guess, verdict about 10.30 am today.
Her children will be scarred for life, whether she's found guilty or not. Was she thinking of them when she did what she did? Hardly the actions of a good mother...Occurs to me that the privacy screen might be a gesture of hope, that she'll soon be acquitted and back home. But also suitable if she is not, unlike a "Welcome Home" sign that would have to be torn down.
I feel for her children, they are victims of all this. She seems to have been a good mother to them.
If they were starting from no knowledge of the case I'd agree, but having sat through all the witness evidence in court and making judgments as they go along, and then having it all reiterated by the judge, and hearing arguments, I think they should be more than ready. I think you know by the end of a trial, and there likely aren't more than a handful of issues that people might want to discuss. Unless there are disagreements, but hopefully not...I wonder though if it’s been enough time to go through all the evidence and the judge’s instructions
She seems to have been a good mother to them.
Respectfully, this isn't entertainment, these are real people's livesI’m bored! Verdict soon please
Thanks.I apologise. It isn't entertainment but I am interested in a verdict all the same. It is a big change to all their lives
I agree.IMO people are paying too much attention to the motive she might have had. There is a reason why the prosecution does not have to provide a motive. Murderers do kill for any number of reasons, some of which are more understandable than others, and putting yourself into the mind of a killer is useless and even counter-productive. Look at the recent events in Idaho, where a man set a brush fire and then started firing at first responders who came to the scene. Apparently he was upset because a law enforcement officer had asked him to move his vehicle. We've all been asked to move our car at some point, but we don't go on a murderous rampage in retaliation.
Must be frustrating only starting at 10:30am. Barely get into it, and it's time for a break, then lunch, then early finish and 16 long hours to fill before you can get back into it again.
I would prefer to go at it until a decision was made, as happens in government sometimes, or at least spend longer each day on it. But I can understand that approach wouldn't be for everyone.
I think they have to deliberate within " court hours "Must be frustrating only starting at 10:30am. Barely get into it, and it's time for a break, then lunch, then early finish and 16 long hours to fill before you can get back into it again.
I would prefer to go at it until a decision was made, as happens in government sometimes, or at least spend longer each day on it. But I can understand that approach wouldn't be for everyone.
And that is presuming that she IS going home...She doesn't need a privacy screen. She can pull the window blinds. She can just be home or out and about as usual. The press isn't interested in pursuing stories from innocent people. They'd be gone before evening if they ever did arrive.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.