To me it looks like the defence is attempting to throw some mud Simon’s way and hoping that it sticks. Maybe trying to garner some sympathy for Erin from the jury?I hope the Prosecution twigs to this and makes it plain to the jury.
And I'm not sure how trying to paint SP in a poor light has any relevance to 4 people being fatally poisoned by a meal cooked by EP.
But there are 10 men on the 15 person jury, so really, who’s going to be so outraged by the child support figure that they will find her not guilty of murder?
It seems like the defence don’t have much and they are reaching.
IMO