Australia AUSTRALIA - 4YO AUGUST (GUS) Missing from rural family home in Outback, Yunta, South Australia, 27th Sept 2025

[Ruminations]

Washed away, id say

Or floated up, one can hope. The flooding has to be good news if he is in a shallow grave.

MOO

 

[Dotta]

There is a paywalled article I have not read. But the headline (which we know isn't always in alignment with the body) says that a tracker thinks the rains could give new information about Gus.

MOO

This one?
Behind Paywall

But
the headline says it all.

"Tracker’s new hope:
Could desert deluge wash up Gus secrets?"

https://twitter.com/x/status/2028964896235503628

 

[kiwi50]

Two members of Gus Lamont's family 'not cooperating' directly with police

South Australia's Police Commissioner has said that two members of missing boy Gus Lamont's family are "not cooperating" with investigators, but a police spokesperson said they could not comment further on the number of suspects in the case.

www.abc.net.au

Nothing new really

 

[gerardo20]

Two members of Gus Lamont's family 'not cooperating' directly with police

South Australia's Police Commissioner has said that two members of missing boy Gus Lamont's family are "not cooperating" with investigators, but a police spokesperson said they could not comment further on the number of suspects in the case.

www.abc.net.au

" South Australia's Police Commissioner has said that two members of missing boy Gus Lamont's family are "not cooperating" with investigators, but a police spokesperson said they could not comment further on the number of suspects in the case.
Police declared the four-year-old boy's disappearance a major crime on February 5, saying a person who resided at Oak Park had withdrawn their support for the police and was no longer cooperating with them, and police were considering that person a suspect."

imo jmo omo moo

That basically all but directly says both members who are not cooperating are effectively suspects ....
Why...?
Previously the police could comment that there was one suspect and that was the person not cooperating.
That meant police were not naming the suspect, as it could be either Josie or Shannon.

Now they have said two members are not cooperating. When a person withdrew cooperation it was announced that that person was a suspect. Now that two are not cooperating, they cannot confirm there are two suspects without implicating both Josie and Shannon as suspects.

Lets put one and one together and read between the lines....

The police will no longer confirm only one suspect, (having affirmed only one suspect previously who was not cooperating.)
Now two persons are not cooperating (other memberS...), so there is reason to believe that now both are effectively suspects.....

imo jmo omo moo

 

[Morequestionsthananswers]

No surprises there IMO

 

[Bats]

Could this be more than 2 are suspects...I wonder?

"South Australia's Police Commissioner has said that two members of missing boy Gus Lamont's family are "not cooperating" with investigators, but a police spokesperson said they could not comment further on the number of suspects in the case."
Two members of Gus Lamont's family 'not cooperating' directly with police

Suspects - plural. So there are at least 2

They were pretty clear about 1 person being a suspect... but not so clear now about the numbers....

Just speculating

MOO