South Australia's Police Commissioner has said that two members of missing boy Gus Lamont's family are "not cooperating" with investigators, but a police spokesperson said they could not comment further on the number of suspects in the case.
www.abc.net.au
" South Australia's Police Commissioner has said that two members of missing boy Gus Lamont's family are "not cooperating" with investigators, but
a police spokesperson said they could not comment further on the number of suspects in the case.
Police declared the four-year-old boy's disappearance a major crime on February 5, saying a person who resided at Oak Park had withdrawn their support for the police and was no longer cooperating with them, and police were considering that person a suspect."
imo jmo omo moo
That basically all but directly says
both members who are not cooperating
are effectively suspects ....
Why...?
Previously the police
could comment that there was one suspect and that was the person not cooperating.
That meant police were not naming the suspect, as it could be either Josie or Shannon.
Now they have said two members are not cooperating. When a person withdrew cooperation it was announced that that person was a suspect. Now that two are not cooperating, they cannot confirm there are two suspects without implicating both Josie and Shannon as suspects.
Lets put one and one together and read between the lines....
The police
will no longer confirm only one suspect, (having affirmed
only one suspect previously who was not cooperating.)
Now two persons are not cooperating (other memberS...), so there is reason to believe that now
both are effectively suspects.....
imo jmo omo moo