Lots of confusing reporting...
The 'husband' turns out to be the brother.
Sounds like there was phone contact on the Tuesday, but weird how the father answer's Amesha's phone when the brother called...
Lots of trivial detail being reported about what the brother, father and Amesha apparently said to each other before she went missing... using gift cards etc (Daily Telegraph, 28 August). If that is indeed what the brother told media, always a bit sus when they start telling these sorts of details, 'too much information' type details...
Strange how she was apparently seen pacing around on Tuesday night in the lobby. I don't believe she really went out to buy milk etc, as she apparently told her father. If she had reasons to fear for her safety beforehand, why go out in the dark to buy groceries?
Issue with the scarf is bizarre too. Why did she not take an access card to go 'grocery shopping'? Even if there weren't enough cards to go around, the brother apparently was at work and the father remained at home. Surely she could have had access to a card, just to go out and buy a couple of things?
Why jam the door open with a SCARF?! Sounds like she was only planning to duck out for a minute or two, otherwise why would you prop a door unlocked like that. In a complex that size, other people would have gone in and out of that door while she was out 'buying groceries' and the door would most likely not have still been held unlocked by the scarf when she got back. I'm sure Amesha would have realised that.
So, the father and brother supposedly spend the night looking for her and then stumbled across her body the next morning? Why not report her missing earlier? What prompted them to look in a drain in a hard to access area behind their block, of all places, if all they supposedly knew was that she had headed out to buy groceries?
That tunnel/drain under re train line is not on the way to any shops...
Yes, the treeline is where the 'creek' is. I understand that usually it is a dry creek bed, but with all the rain, there was water there and also in the tunnel under the train line.
I also think it's weird how the father answered Amesha's phone...
Lots of things don't add up in this story.
I'm hoping the cctv footage that the police have seized will shed further light on this. Surely it would become apparent for how long that door remained propped open with the scarf.
Then there are the reports in msm of Amesha being found dead with a 'scarf wrapped around her neck'. That's weird too. Is that insinuating that this same scarf was subsequently found on her?