I did not register before tonight that Lynn, as well as leaving her glasses behind, had left her contact lenses.
No one. NO one leaves their contact lenses behind. What a lack of insight the Northern Beaches Police showed...
There were a couple of things that struck me about the glasses. One thing from Helena's diary about Lyn having an appointment for new contact lenses.
"Wednesday 13th
I waited in all day for her call, which didn’t eventuate. Chris’s didn’t either. Wednesday 13th Lyn had an appointment with Dr King at Dee Why, an eye specialist, to have new contact lenses fitted as she held a credit or $138 for them. She did not keep it and I have recently cancelled the credit with OPSM sanctum."
From the judgement:
285 Lynette Dawson packed no bag. She took no clothes. She appears to have taken no personal items such as toiletries, makeup or jewellery.
Even her contact lenses were found amongst her possessions in a blue container when delivered by Mr Dawson with the rest of her belongings. According to Mr Dawson’s account, she stepped from his car in that condition onto the metaphorical footpath at Mona Vale, presumably on this hypothesis by then already having decided never to return.
This was provided by Greg Simms in testimony in returned items.
From JC's evidence
71. Paul Dawson also spoke about this: “Q. How many times, if ever, were you shown a bankcard statement for Lynette Dawson? A. I can’t remember ever being shown a bankcard statement for Lyn Dawson.”
72. JC was taken to a statement that she gave to the police on 18 September 1998, in which she said this:
“In 1982 I recall see something a bankcard statement at the house which indicated a transaction involving something connected to an optical purchase. I cannot remember how much it was or any other details or who made the transaction.
I cannot remember the circumstances of my actual seeing this statement but it seemed to be an indication that Lyn was still around. Lyn used to wear contact lenses and spectacles."
73 JC confirmed that she gave similar evidence at the coronial proceedings in 2003 in the following terms: “Q. Did you ever see a bankcard statement come into the house? A. I can't recall I think I might have. Q. Can you remember when that was? A. Very early in 1982."
So from this statement from JC in 1982, the optical purchase may have been a credit on the statement for her contact lenses that she never got or a refund for them. The defence trying to make it seem like proof of life, in context this could have meant the opposite.