R v Dawson - NSW Caselaw

The above is the link to the decision on his sentence.
In the latest, and possibly last Teacher's Trial podcast, it is said that Chris Dawson was estranged from his 3rd wife, Sue. This didn't come as a great surprise but I hadn't heard it stated as a matter of fact before. I suspected it, and stated it here, after Greg Walsh's statement outside the court after Dawson had been found guilty.
The 2018 article stated that it was Chris' brother Peter (not his twin Paul) and Sue who posted the surety against Chris' bail and I think it was something like $1.5million.I did read that quite awhile ago. I don't recall what news outlet it was, but I posted about it here.
Later I thought it must have been incorrect, because I didn't hear about it again.
I was going to add that there'll be no more wives, but who knows ?
Are prisoners here allowed to get married and have "visits" like in some countries.
Also some women are attracted to men in prison. Even ones in for murder.
First Lyn, then JC and later Sue. Everything points to Chris Dawson having used and abused women almost his entire life.I definitely read quite awhile back, that CD and Sue had separated.
And then more recently someone posted that Sue would not be giving Christopher Dawson any more money.
Was it an ad in a paper cutting off any financial ties to her or something like that.
I'm guessing that could only come about as the result of a successful civil action against Dawson? The worry is, Dawson may have nothing left after the cost of his trial and anything that remains could be in someone else's name, so as it can't be sued for.Does anyone know if there has been or will ever be any financial restitution made to Lyn's two daughters for the value of the family assets which would have been Lyn's at the time she was murdered?
Someone here posted the application for legal aid a while ago. It said there was $200,000 owed to Sue from her retirement funds and other money owed to family for legal bills. With the appeal being handled by a Public Defendant after Greg Walsh handed over the reins, it seems that he has been successful in getting legal aid.I'm guessing that could only come about as the result of a successful civil action against Dawson? The worry is, Dawson may have nothing left after the cost of his trial and anything that remains could be in someone else's name, so as it can't be sued for.
I had thought he would have had wife number four on the hook by now.I do recall saying a while ago that in spite of having had 3 wives, at the end of the day CD has no "little woman" to stand by him. Not even a daughter. Silly man, his vanity, lust and selfishness cost him everything in the end.
Which is covering all legal areas, for no appeal IMO
"During his sentencing remarks, Justice Ian Harrison said it could not be determined whether Dawson had help in murdering Lynette, the mother of two of his children, and her final resting place was still unknown"
Thank you Trooper, from my heart.I was sad to read this, Shadow. So much of this goes on behind closed doors. So many chilren traumatised, and scarred.
Here is what I think is probable. I think Dawson had help, not paid help, like a hired killer, I am sure he floated the idea but was put off by the cost, all of them being meaner than mean. Someone in his family circle helped him, either during or after the murder, and that someone is the loose unit in the brick wall, as I see it.
One day... one day.. who can ever forget the matinee jacket right under where the body of an English tourist fell at Uluhru? buried for years by a busy dingo, until one sunny afternoon, someone high up on the Rock misses a step and.....
One day, Dawson will face his 'matinee jacket ' moment.
And Dawson still has other charges to face, I do not believe they will be sunk out of the courts calendar, people still have matters of law to resolve with Dawson. All of that will be done by Zoom, no need for him to ever leave his grey walls at all. Gone are the days when court day was an outing for prisoners.
Does anyone know if there has been or will ever be any financial restitution made to Lyn's two daughters for the value of the family assets which would have been Lyn's at the time she was murdered?
Any volunteers?I had thought he would have had wife number four on the hook by now.
All yours ladies. I wouldn't drink a beer if he bought me one and the Dawsons are known for their short arms and deep pockets.Any volunteers?![]()
I wonder what the timeframe is with Chris Dawson's carnal knowledge case? I assume it will still go ahead, regardless of the fact he will be spending the remainder of his life in jail anyway. I guess the priority of it being heard anytime soon is now reduced? Perhaps his appeal, assuming he carries through with one, needs to be sorted first?I was looking for the downloadable version of the document which someone published before here and I downloaded.
Instead I found two other judgements relating to the judge only trial and the suppression orders.
This details the reason for the suppression and relates to the influence on the carnal knowledge charge. The specifics of the dates relate to it being in the second half of school year before school ended. 12 December must have been the last day of school for that year in NSW. Maroubra was where his parents lived.
"However, the indictment in the carnal knowledge trial is in the following terms:
“On a day between 1 July 1980 and 12 December 1980, at Maroubra in the State of New South Wales, [Christopher Michael Dawson] did unlawfully and carnally know [JC] a girl above the age of 10 years and under the age of 17 years, namely 16 years and who was at that time a pupil of the said Christopher Michael Dawson.”
I found this amusing.
"The material deposed to by Ms Nygh concerning the searches and search results obtained by her using the term “Chris Dawson Murder” returned literally several million results. It is simply not possible to neutralise this type of publicity. Suppression of what amounts to a less sensational version of the same material that it is anticipated will be led in the context of Mr Dawson’s trial is therefore said to be effectively futile."
R v Dawson - NSW Caselaw
www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au
This is off his solicitor's website
R v Dawson [2022] NSWSC 552 - Greg Walsh & Co.
Greg Walsh & Co is a boutique law firm specialising in Criminal, Civil, Disciplinary, Family, and Compensation Lawwww.gregwalsh.com.au
The only thing I can find about a trial is in the headline of an article from July 2022 which says the carnal knowledge trial is delayed nine months. It's a subscription article so that's all I've got.I wonder what the timeframe is with Chris Dawson's carnal knowledge case? I assume it will still go ahead, regardless of the fact he will be spending the remainder of his life in jail anyway. I guess the priority of it being heard anytime soon is now reduced? Perhaps his appeal, assuming he carries through with one, needs to be sorted first?