Just to clarify a common misconception,
we don’t know if RB presented himself to Marion as FNR.
Agree
2.In RB’s version of events (to be taken with a grain of salt), they first met in Switzerland when he was WW.
Agree. This may or may not have happened with someone, but suspect not with MB, suspect he was trying to make a point with establishing a prior relationships and MB predispositions; ie he was the hunted not the hunter.
3.He claims they met again in 1996 or 97 after
she posted a lonely hearts ad that
he responded to. At inquest, he first said he responded as WW, then he said he can’t remember. I don’t think he was asked what name Marion specifically called him, maybe this will happen in April?
Clearly changing stories, and I think he may have been questioned on this, and result was inconclusive, will have to re-listen again. As for her posting the ad and not him, see (3) above re: establishing predispositions. For actually establishing connection with the women, we have only two real sources - advertisements placed in newspapers (RB and GGB) and connections through recent ex-husbands (JO). Both should be explored, as should 'advertisements' ie MB teacher of the year award in newspaper.
4.RB also claims he never used the FNR name or licence other than for the 1994 Le Courrier rencontre (obviously, I don't believe it).
Neither. But don't forget the tenuous connection to the R name from the payroll clerk at the timeshare opposite the Arts centre, where MB told SL she met the man in the car at the service station. All are possibilities, and all may add up, especially in a situation where it appears there are VERY few coincidences.
5.We have no idea if Marion ever saw the 1994 rencontre, and we have no evidence RB ever called himself FNR during his affair with Marion in 1996/97.
Agree. Hardly likely she would have seen the ad. But it's an 'out' that conveniently deflects from the real reason behind the introduction. And no, we don't have any evidence he called himself FNR to her. See below (9).
6.Also note that RB used the Richard Westbury alias to travel in and out of Aus to Japan during Marion’s disappearance.
Agree. Could well be. It's a nice clean passport. She might have known him as RW. But there's a sticky for me @Peralta! See (9) below:
7.It is possible RB flew the JAL leg of the trip as Richard Westbury, then used FNR, Fredy David or some other name for the European leg of the trip when he was allegedly with Marion.
Could be, but I think Fredy David (or Freddy - he could have at least learnt how to spell it) might have been retired once it was attached to the deH name and an attempt at 'respectability', in at least one facet of his life.
8.The reason I bring up Fredy David is that he and DdH excessively lied to obscure that alias, so I wonder if he was still using it overseas?
See (7) above.
9.Which leads us to ask, what name did RB
actually use on Marion? There might be other reasons why Marion changed her name to FNMR, other than ‘it was RB’s name' and 'she married him’.
I agree. But if we assume that it was Marion who changed her name, it would be at his specific suggestion to FNMR. And why the FNMR? There would, in all practicality, have to be some 'justifiable' reason: eg It is my name, we should have the same. Underlying: The initials and the surname are perhaps for a specific ID theft reason. There are very few coincidences in this story. Everything is done for a purpose. And if it was not MB who engineered and implemented the name change, we may well end up with the same conclusion.
10.As we’ve discussed, despite what it says on Marion’s passenger cards, there’s no evidence that she ran away permanently and was currently a married housewife living in Luxembourg. In fact, we know much of that sentence is
not true.
Agree wholeheartedly. There's nothing on that sentence in that passenger card that speaks to the truth, perhaps just what MB believes to be the truth.
11.To me, it just looks as though someone tried very hard
to make it look that way. Just IMO.