He has only just started his address to the jury.
what don't we SEE on the recording?>. we don't SEE what he did that made her jump the railing.. it had to be something so menacing that jumping the railing was actually a choice.. ... I am thinking of people who jump from burning buildings.. on the face of it, it's a crazed thing to do, straight out the window and straight down 14 floors, sometimes more, and the question is, what were they fleeing that was worse than the inevitable end resulting from jumping?.. the fire, the silent fire, the inexorable unarguable fire closing in.. do I want to be burnt? or do I want to be crushed and broken.
We don't know what she saw that made her jump.. Gabe isn't going to tell us, either, naturally. But she fell 14 floors , as opposed to getting back into that apartment and that can only be due to terror of what was in that apartment, that was bigger than the terror of falling . .
Totally forgot he defended Bayley.
'think of Adrian as your son!!.. your brother!!.. your uncle!!..
:couch:
And for that you should be eternally grateful.
Legal Aid rejected Baileys request for funding and as persons accused of serious crimes in Australia have a common law right to competent legal counsel, had Holt QC (or someone else) not stepped in to provide Adrian Bailey with legal representation, the court would have had no choice but to permanently stay a number of matters on which Bailey was convicted of.
Do you have any evidence that was actually said?
.....
.....
Imagine if Warriena's friends / ex lovers etc came forward with what they have seen when she's been intoxicated. I have a feeling this behaviour was not isolated. Does that mean she should have died, no way but it also means that Gable Tostee probably doesn't belong in jail.
I don't see any reference to Bayley there? I was referring to Trooper's earlier allegation that it was a line borrowed from Bayley's parole(?) hearing.
Her behaviour is not on trial, Tostee's behaviour is. If the defence felt people in Warriena's life could offer relevant information for his defence, why not call them as witnesses? Oh hang on, no need for witnesses, let the tape speak for itself...
And for that you should be eternally grateful.
Legal Aid rejected Baileys request for funding and as persons accused of serious crimes in Australia have a common law right to competent legal counsel, had Holt QC (or someone else) not stepped in to provide Adrian Bailey with legal representation, the court would have had no choice but to permanently stay a number of matters on which Bailey was convicted of.
Do you have any evidence that was actually said?
JCB, I didn't say his defence of Bayley was bad. In actuality, the fact that Bayley got a 35 year minimum for Meagher's death (even though it was an open and shut case) and eventually got a rape overturned by Holt is very good defence.
Her behaviour is not on trial, Tostee's behaviour is. If the defence felt people in Warriena's life could offer relevant information for his defence, why not call them as witnesses? Oh hang on, no need for witnesses, let the tape speak for itself...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.