So what was it that Tostee had in his hand in the CCTV footage. The same thing that he had hidden in his pants? The same thing he throws in a bin? Why did he need to conceal that in his pants and then get rid of it? He removed evidence from the crime scene!
Very often the delay in help arriving, whether it be a neighbour or emergency services, is too little too late. Seconds can mean the difference between a person surviving an assault. He could have been out that door in a flash - that was why she tried to escape IMO.
If he was intent on assaulting her, why put her out on the balcony? Remember, she was attacking him and he did not retaliate other than to restrain her, and ultimately neutralise her by putting her on the balcony (to calm down, sleep it off.......whatever.) How can it be credibly contented he could reasonably have foreseen she would go over the balcony for any reason? Clearly, he wanted nothing other than the violence to stop. If he wanted her blood, all he had to do to get it was engage with her inside the Unit and slug it out with her.
So what was it that Tostee had in his hand in the CCTV footage. The same thing that he had hidden in his pants? The same thing he throws in a bin? Why did he need to conceal that in his pants and then get rid of it? He removed evidence from the crime scene!
I'm sure anyone who has experienced 'breath restriction' would attest to it feeling no different to choking, surely.
The interesting thing with this sort of comment about the knife is that for all we know he had a knife in his hand. Not saying he did, but we have no way of knowing what he was doing at that specific point in time to exacerbate her fear. He could have run his hand across his throat, gestured something that made her think he was going to hurt her further.
If he was intent on assaulting her, why put her out on the balcony? Remember, she was attacking him and he did not retaliate other than to restrain her, and ultimately neutralise her by putting her on the balcony (to calm down, sleep it off.......whatever.) How can it be credibly contented he could reasonably have foreseen she would go over the balcony for any reason? Clearly, he wanted nothing other than the violence to stop. If he wanted her blood, all he had to do to get it was engage with her inside the Unit and slug it out with her.
Entertainment value via intimidation. Tostee IMO was getting off (intellectually, sexually, anyone's guess) on the control he was wielding over her. In his eyes, I believe he enjoyed seeing how women reacted when he did certain things, acted certain ways. Here he had an intoxicated and clearly distressed woman, expressing and displaying fear, and he was toying with her. I think I have explained why I think he put her out there in enough posts now, people are going to get sick of hearing it lol.:twocents:
Kate Kyriacou ‏@KateKyriacou [video=twitter;786795882855342080]https://twitter.com/KateKyriacou/status/786795882855342080[/video] Holt says Tostee's spontaneous words "it's all on recording you know" demonstrates he believes it will show he has done nothing wrong.
Kate Kyriacou ‏@KateKyriacou [video=twitter;786801472516141056]https://twitter.com/KateKyriacou/status/786801472516141056[/video]
Holt says more importantly, where is the evidence #tostee even knew how to do a "military-style hold"?
Where did the prosecutor ever mention "military-style hold"? This bloke is making stuff up as he goes along. He's already contradicted himself on a few occasions now.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.