- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Messages
- 70,215
- Reaction score
- 273,773
But in Donoghues FIRST LE interview, he makes no mention of the phone call. I find it strange that he mentions it in the 2nd interview, and then adds even more specific details in the 3rd interview, 5 months later.Let's see how that works. FFC says to FGM, "William is playing around there, L's out on the balcony, watch them, I'm going to take a shower." Because she would have had to give some reason for her absence to explain putting FGM in charge. FGM supervises L for a bit then goes to check on William. She can't find him because he's been taken in the car with FFC. She then looks for FFC and can't find her either. She doesn't notice the car is missing. She panics and calls Wendy. Surely she says both FFC and MFC are absent. FFC turns up with wet hair (to show she's been in the shower), "What? You've lost William?! Whatever will MFC say? What will everyone say? What's going to happen to you, they'll surely lock you up this time. I know, we'll say we were both here, they won't blame you." And Wendy, despite having left the tennis club because FGM told her William was missing, forgets all about that call.
Or how do you see that scenario playing out?
I would put more credibility on the 1st interview, as it was closer to the actual incident.
In my opinion, building an entire narrative, based only upon the details he came up with on his 3rd interview, seem to be a stretch/
25th September 2014 - no mention of witnessing any call that Wendy Hudson might have taken at the tennis club
11th November 2015 - told the police that Wendy Hudson took a call about William
2nd Feb 2017 - told the police that Wendy took a call "that made him think a child was missing"
View attachment 337697
Did William Tyrrell disappear earlier than reported? Why CCTV could prove crucial | Daily Mail Online