Im not sure if discussing the where’s William episode by Lia Harris is allowed. I was listening to it again and I find this strange. This is the direct quotes from the FFC and MFC about about why the FFC automatically believed William was kidnapped..
FFC: so what made me think that he was snatched, that somebody had taken him? Was that the fact that I couldn’t see him going into the bush. I couldn’t see him running down the slope to that, to the street. I, it was just..
MFC: nup, he wouldn’t do it, he wouldn’t do it
FFC: I actually, I don’t have the words to describe what it was like standing there looking out and thinking, why is he not here, I don’t understand this. But it’s the only……somebody was there.
So according to both, William wouldn’t go down to the road But they are sure he’s still been kidnapped (snatched, taken)? This goes with the MFC stating in the police run through that William “wasn’t a wanderer”.
So not only was someone waiting on purpose or just coming past by happenstance, but they believe because William wouldn’t have gone down to the road or the bush, so the kidnapper must have made their way up quite close to the house? That Seems quite far fetched imo.
The part I referenced is from Ep 3: One Last Roar, around 5:40