RSBM
I think the difference in the Keisha case as opposed to WT's case was that it looked like a text book case from the start with the parents as the suspects. The evidence they removed would have confirmed straight away that some type of trauma may have occurred to the victim in the flat on those particular articles. They just had to wait, knowing that through other means, they could keep an eye on the other children with varying excuses until police were led to her body. In WT's case, if there were any DNA of his found in the searches of BS property they could straight away charge him with at the very least being an accessory to abduction and very likely have him in jail without bail on those charges until a trial. The reason is he poses a greater risk to society in general. He might start throwing out other people's names while he is in custody and others would be investigated if it really wasn't him. Even if they don't come up with a body, the charges as they progress could become murder. It has been stated a number of times on this thread, he does not have a criminal record.IMO
True but my point was despite the fact the evidence was there, nothing was said by LE for a year to the public. For all we knew they found nothing. And it was probably very obvious from the evidence that poor little Kiesha was dead but again, nothing was said about the evidence at all. They still waited it out until they found the grave. The LE do seem convinced he is alive so I think it is a waiting game of a different kind here. I hope so.