4 in total; not 5.
Yes, I didn't say 5. i said 3. (because one is missing).
4 in total; not 5.
It's possible there is a 5th. The first reports said he was with his younger sister. Google "william tyrell" "younger sister" http://www.news.com.au/national/nsw...t/news-story/8ec7367f36aeaf80bfd2e9b3f4986455 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...hed-grandmother-s-backyard.html#ixzz4N3RszpSm There may be a photo floating around when William, his sister LT and bio mum were on a picnic, and you can see what appears to be an older girl lying down, photo taken from behind so you just see her back.
Yes, I didn't say 5. i said 3. (because one is missing).
The pics that I have seen have all appeared to have been taken in public places, with happy children. I know that here, which is not in oz, our FACS system encourages communication between fosters and bios. Sometimes the relationships are horrible and filled with constant rife and notes must constantly be taken and meetings held and etc. Other times it's just amicable. And other times it's actually a good relationship, at least while things are going according to a mutually acceptable plan/arrangement. But if something were to change, such as perhaps taking the children out of the country, for example, that could quickly change the pleasantries into something else.
Just as a note, and speaking from experience having been a fp over *here* for a few years (so it *may* be different over there, don't know?), the visits normally do happen at a FACS centre (or sometimes in the fp's own home with the fp as 'supervisor' of the visit). However, if a bio family is preparing for the transition of getting their kids back, or if the placement is done on a voluntary basis, the parents are allowed to have visits unsupervised, and take them to their homes, or on outings, etc. Even for overnight visits. Having seen photos of the 3 'remaining' children of the bio mom visiting together in a public place, is another reason why i am considering the possibility that bio mom may have willingly put her 2 kids into care for whatever reason(s) she had.
Nowhere did it or I say anything about 5 children. I said the 3 'remaining' children, which are the bio mom's 4 children minus WT, who is missing. Also, the bio family and the ff both live in Sydney, allowing for easy visits.
I doubt if even McD's would save a video recording of every minute in every location for 2 years, unless there was an event which occurred which needed to be saved (such as a robbery or a holdup or something)? i think it would have had to have been checked quickly to ensure it didn't get overwritten. jmo.
As much as police are great and do an excellent job, there is nothing wrong with crossing t's and dotting i's, especially when it comes to a missing 3 year old child. It doesn't have to mean that police doubted the validity of the cellphone photo, but rather, that they were just being thorough, which is actually what they are supposed to do. again, jmo.
Relax, no one said you said there was 5 children. I just cant add up.
Does Bio Dad live in Sydney?
These days its more a possibility because storage is so cheap and injury litigation so great. But it must pushing limits.
Bio Dad, along with William's siblings et al are off limits Crabstick, or didn't you know that?
When you consider the Daniel Morcombe case, and the level of media presence by his parents. This is the weirdest case ever!!!
Court suppression is so oppressive, its like the government don't want the case resolved, and court suppression has hindered Williams recovery, to the point, government could be legal liable for the prevention of justice and safety. Pain and suffering.
Imo, there seems to be somewhat of a distasteful impression that the suppression acts as some kind of shield in this case, in more ways than one.
And even though Morcombe's family was right out there in the lights for all that time, look how long it took to catch their perp. And as it turned out, even though he was a possibility in the beginning, the perp was someone pretty much ignored, due to perhaps taking too much at face value, not enough followup or effort, etc. From what I understand, it took a coroner's inquest, which police, if they had had their way, wouldn't have happened at all. If only all parties could work together with the same goal of just finding missing children and bringing justice to the right places. jmo.
Imo, there seems to be somewhat of a distasteful impression that the suppression acts as some kind of shield in this case, in more ways than one.
And even though Morcombe's family was right out there in the lights for all that time, look how long it took to catch their perp. And as it turned out, even though he was a possibility in the beginning, the perp was someone pretty much ignored, due to perhaps taking too much at face value, not enough followup or effort, etc. From what I understand, it took a coroner's inquest, which police, if they had had their way, wouldn't have happened at all. If only all parties could work together with the same goal of just finding missing children and bringing justice to the right places. jmo.
bbm
I remember someone/druggy? had given the perp a false alibi. Could always happen it seems, hopefully not in the WT-case ...??
I have no idea technically but: are users able to communicate via their often used darknet (without Pings) ...? - Sorry, maybe a completely stupid question. :blushing:
Contemporary crime is harder to solve because crime is more and more committed by people unknown to the victim, a much larger population, better transport and communications.
While police often draw critic, their job is getting harder, not easier. Its very easy to critic police in a very large institution like other large institutions find communicting with each other more complex not to mention the hindrance of law such as court suppression orders by their own departments.
At times, there must be some level of apathy.
And in some cases, some cases, the perpetrator is already in prison, or put in prison by police on charges they can 'win', and while the perpetrator is in prison, more evidence comes forth, and then when the perpetrator walks out of prison, they are smashed again by police to ensure they receive the best result to keep public safe.
Look at Khandles POI, another state, in prison. Transient criminals nationwide, global even more common. Maybe one the perpetrators is already in prison but police cant tell you.
We need to find William...
BBM: UBM: And therein lies the answer to William's disappearance IMO. I fully believe that the investigator's know who took William but they just don't have enough evidence yet to proceed with an arrest. I also believe there has been a shift...there is something festering beneath the surface since the announcement of the reward and it's not going to be pretty at all when it does hit the surface.
Addressing media in Queensland, she said restrictions on carers and parents when a foster child went missing were actually making them targets for predators.
“They can target these particular kids because they are far more vulnerable than any other and response to their disappearance is less than adequate,” she said.
“If someone stole your child you’d be all over the place in 30 seconds and you’d be allowed to by law — but these parents, these families and these foster carers can’t and these offenders know that. Make no mistake.
Title:Most vulnerable children we’re not allowed to talk about: How Tia Palmer’s death highlights problems with foster care rules
Author: Liz Burke, Date:November 14, 2015 2:24pm
Online: 13 Oct 2016, Status:Non paywall
Ref link: http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/pa...s/news-story/0bc47ce7fa11ad5a68b697979202a76d
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.