Australia Australia - William Tyrrell, 3, Kendall, Nsw, 12 Sept 2014 - #35

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #581
I’ve just finished watching the series 2 of struggle street on SBS. Not important to this case really but just made me think how the other half live and what drugs can do. It’s a very sad but good watch . You are either born into this cycle or one step away from being in it if you make bad choices
 
  • #582
  • #583
UPDATE: STRIKE FORCE SET UP AS SNIFFER DOGS FAIL TO PICK UP SCENT OF WILLIAM TYRELL - NBN News
The 3-year-old boy was last seen playing with his sister in his grandmother’s Kendall frontyard on Friday morning.
Superintendent Paul Fehon says neither police sniffer dogs nor cadaver dogs have been able to pick up any sign of the boy, fuelling fears he may not have wandered away from home.

Does that mean he was never at Kendall?
The visit was meant to “surprise” the grandmother.


Chloexx that article is saying that his scent wasn't picked up at other neighbouring properties/Bush.

Therefore they are led to believe he was grabbed from the yard as that's where his scent stopped.
 
  • #584
Chloexx that article is saying that his scent wasn't picked up at other neighbouring properties/Bush.

Therefore they are led to believe he was grabbed from the yard as that's where his scent stopped.

Thanks for clarifying. I got a bit confused :(
 
  • #585
  • #586
Two quite significant statements from your link, soso:

‘It's understood no clear sign of William has been found so far and, if nothing is discovered in the final week of searching, investigators will be able to confidently conclude the boy was abducted.

Ms Grahame's presence at the search is understood to be a result of the high-profile nature of the Tyrrell case, not because it has been referred to the coroner for an inquest.’

NSW coroner joins William Tyrrell search | PerthNow

I can't believe that 3 weeks has gone by so quickly. Initially I thought 4 weeks was a long time for searching but see now they would probably like even more time if possible. I still find it odd though that they didn't do this 2nd thorough forensic search earlier than 4 years down the track to confidently conclude he was abducted. Might just be me, but it seems like the best way to go to make sure that the focus is on the right theory, i.e. abduction. Makes me think even more that they really are just wrapping the final bow on prior to arrest/s and they've known for some time.... Impatient for justice...
 
  • #587
Your welcome, way back I remember everybody was confused re: WT's scent

Missing William Tyrell could not have survived alone in bush: police
Sniffer dogs and cadaver dogs found no scent in the yard, fuelling fears he may have been abducted.

Yes, the above was even published in the SMH which i know caught my attention at the time. I believe the FFamily was under heavy suspicion at the beginning of the investigation, being the last and only people to see WT in Kendall, and therefore they had to be looked at closely first. However, they have been cleared.
 
  • #588
I can't believe that 3 weeks has gone by so quickly. Initially I thought 4 weeks was a long time for searching but see now they would probably like even more time if possible. I still find it odd though that they didn't do this 2nd thorough forensic search earlier than 4 years down the track to confidently conclude he was abducted. Might just be me, but it seems like the best way to go to make sure that the focus is on the right theory, i.e. abduction. Makes me think even more that they really are just wrapping the final bow on prior to arrest/s and they've known for some time.... Impatient for justice...

It does seem to have gone by quickly, especially as they also had the Batar Creek site to search. They may need more time — I guess we’ll have to wait and see if the Benaroon Drive search is extended.

It also seems like we’re coming to some sort of conclusion. Whether that will be an arrest or inquest, I’m not so sure at the moment. I’m impatient for justice for William and his loved ones too. This must be torture for them.
 
  • #589
  • #590
  • #591
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #592
UPDATE: STRIKE FORCE SET UP AS SNIFFER DOGS FAIL TO PICK UP SCENT OF WILLIAM TYRELL - NBN News
The 3-year-old boy was last seen playing with his sister in his grandmother’s Kendall frontyard on Friday morning.
Superintendent Paul Fehon says neither police sniffer dogs nor cadaver dogs have been able to pick up any sign of the boy, fuelling fears he may not have wandered away from home.

Who do you mean by “he” William ? Because if you do it has been verified a million times. The photo ect proves that as does his scent from the dogs.

Missing William Tyrell could not have survived alone in bush: police
Sniffer dogs and cadaver dogs found no scent in the yard, fuelling fears he may have been abducted.

Yes, the above was even published in the SMH which i know caught my attention at the time. I believe the FFamily was under heavy suspicion at the beginning of the investigation, being the last and only people to see WT in Kendall, and therefore they had to be looked at closely first. However, they have been cleared.

Yes the photo has been verified that WT was there that very day. But why does MSM say that dogs couldn't pick up a scent in the yard. Wasn't he running around the yard playing chasey's?? So there would've and should've been a scent in the yard.

The photo vs the scent contradicts itself
 
  • #593
Yes the photo has been verified that WT was there that very day. But why does MSM say that dogs couldn't pick up a scent in the yard. Wasn't he running around the yard playing chasey's?? So there would've and should've been a scent in the yard.

The photo vs the scent contradicts itself
I could be wrong, but I think you’ll find they couldn’t pick up a scent beyond the yard. MOO, but my memory isn’t what it used to be.
 
  • #594
Yes the photo has been verified that WT was there that very day. But why does MSM say that dogs couldn't pick up a scent in the yard. Wasn't he running around the yard playing chasey's?? So there would've and should've been a scent in the yard.

The photo vs the scent contradicts itself
Wrong, read back in threads ,scent was detected .will search back now to clarify this point that’s has been discussed many times
 
  • #595
Yes the photo has been verified that WT was there that very day. But why does MSM say that dogs couldn't pick up a scent in the yard. Wasn't he running around the yard playing chasey's?? So there would've and should've been a scent in the yard.

The photo vs the scent contradicts itself
Beyond the boundary
 
  • #596
Not sure what your point is with the last 2 posts FG?
Re sniffer dogs: On the thread the question had been discussed, whether WT disappeared from the front yard or the drive way or the side of the house. When I searched for "dog's scent" (my memory told me, the scent had ended on the front yard near the street), then I found the old article. Thought, it would be interesting.
Re "something felt wrong" : Important, IMO, to remember this statement by police. Today, in 2018, something still feels very wrong and mysterious.

As always: things, which would help the investigation, are unknown to us or taboo.
 
  • #597
Get it on tape ...lol

If an inquest is announced - any persons of interest could be called upon to face a public hearing.

You do not want to be placed on the witness list of a coronial inquiry. So “come to us before we come to you” because you WILL be telling your story.

Link to A paper on NSW inquests. http://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/NSWBarAssocNews/2014/12.pdf

Quote from the paper says.

it should be remembered that if an important witness refuses to provide a statement (or supplies a statement that is not comprehensive) then it is far more likely that the witness will be placed on the witness list and subpoenaed to give oral evidence at the inquest (and is likely to spend more time in the witness box).

Section 58(2) provides that (subject to other provisions in the Act) a witness cannot be compelled to answer a question or produce a document that might tend to incriminate them, or render them liable to a civil penalty. This provision however, is subject to s 61, which empowers a coroner to compel a witness to give evidence if the coroner is satisfied that the interests of justice require it, and giving the evidence will not render the witness liable to a criminal offence or civil penalty under a law of a foreign country.
 
  • #598
I'm well aware WT's scent stopped at the boundary. I've followed this case from day dot and was apart of WS threads way back.

I'm pointing out for the confusion Chloexx had and many other's have re the scent. The articles posted in THIS thread say no scent. Each different MSM article contradicts itself, but that doesn't give us the right to be so rude to new members
 
  • #599
I'm well aware WT's scent stopped at the boundary. I've followed this case from day dot and was apart of WS threads way back.

I'm pointing out for the confusion Chloexx had and many other's have re the scent. The articles posted in THIS thread say no scent. Each different MSM article contradicts itself, but that doesn't give us the right to be so rude to new members

They have differed, haven't they?

Police dogs were brought in and they managed to find William’s scent, but only within the boundaries of the backyard.
The boy no one can find

This one is interesting given the recent searches.

Police dogs have failed to pick up any scent trails to suggest William wandered off into the dense, hilly bushland opposite his grandparents’ house.

We’re for Sydney | Daily Telegraph
 
  • #600
4 unknown high priority suspects!

maybe if the thread wasn't a confined gag order the information would leak through.

just sayin…...:confused::confused:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
108
Guests online
2,251
Total visitors
2,359

Forum statistics

Threads
632,725
Messages
18,630,963
Members
243,274
Latest member
WickedGlow
Back
Top