Interesting that the white van was searched during/around the same time period as the 'forensic search' last year, when GJ and his coworker had that disagreement apparently about which POI to focus on first?
It was aroubd the same time as WTs abduction. I thought maybe they might be asked about where he took them, if he had any toys in his van..things like that? Long shot I know...
I don't think this Rob is the man, though. Wrong age. It seems he joined NSWFB in 1975, but sex offender Robert's older brother Tim is 45.
In the paperwork, they don't name the victims' names, so isn't it possible they might want a closed court if those people were to testify?
I had initially thought that the man in the article (Robert) was the father of the man being discussed at inquest, as 'the father' also has a son named with the same name as this new POI's brother.. but wrong family I suppose, since the reporter stated the POI's brother is older, but in the article (since deleted) said the brother was the 'youngest' son. Sorry for the confusion!NSWFB - where is it mentioned he joined the Fire Brigade? I thought he was an SES member.
The article Deugirtni posted concerned a "Rob" Donohue who was in the NSWFB, but we've agreed Rob isn't Robert the sex offender because Rob would be too old, and Robert probably isn't one of Rob's sons because Rob's youngest son is Tim, whereas . . . never mind.NSWFB - where is it mentioned he joined the Fire Brigade? I thought he was an SES member.
NSWFB - where is it mentioned he joined the Fire Brigade? I thought he was an SES member.
It seems to me that they already have all of the history that has been discussed at the inquest to date?Possible, but wouldn't they already have that history?
It seems to me that they already have all of the history that has been discussed at the inquest to date?
It's possible, but I can't see why they would want them. They have all the evidence from them, and he's been convicted.
I agree, unless they knew something relevant to William's case that wasn't relevant to the trial. Say that the offender had disclosed a predilection for children in spiderman suits.My thoughts exactly, so why would they need the victims to testify?
So far, from what I have read, it seems that police already had all of the evidence tendered, so why have any of them testify?My thoughts exactly, so why would they need the victims to testify?
Almost 1/2 way into second week and not much we’ve learnt beside RD. Hope it’s not all closed from here on inI wonder how many days the inquest will be 'closed' for these 5 witnesses to testify?
I think it was a Suzuki van.If Donahoe's station wagon was the one seen on Benaroon Drive, I wonder what his connection to Benaroon Drive was? It's been said throughout this whole investigation that you only go onto that road if you live there or are visiting someone. Police seem to think it was someone acting on their impulses, not planned.
Oh, and finally those very old articles about the tennis club make sense. They were investigating this guy.
Yes, not a station wagon.I think it was a Suzuki van.
We’re for Sydney | Daily Telegraph
NoCookies | The Australian
If anyone can post a bit of the articles, it would be greatly appreciated!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.