Australia Australia - William Tyrrell, 3, Kendall, Nsw, 12 Sept 2014 - #44

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #461
Channel 7 morning show is having a segment on finding William.
Dunno when during the show.
 
  • #462
  • #463
Channel 7 morning show is having a segment on finding William.
Dunno when during the show.

Let us know what it's about! I have a date with the hairdresser to remove some patches of grey :(
 
  • #464
Did Dr Slueth attend Taree inquest at the end of this week? Curious to know thoughts on the remaining who were questioned the last couple days and the remainder of Paul S being questioned.
 
  • #465
Heads up ... there has been a change ... WS banner now says that WS will be down from 11am Sat our NSW time.


Tricia's post:
The closest time we can tell you Websleuths will be back up and operating is any time between early Saturday, August 24th, to Monday, August 26th. (meaning very late Sat night to sometime Tues our Aussie time)
Barring any unforeseen problems Websleuths will be back up between the time frame above.
WEBSLEUTHS WILL BE DOWN STARTING TONIGHT 8 PM CENTRAL FOR REPAIRS
 
  • #466
  • #467

This inquest is testing everyone's patience. It's highly frustrating for everyone.

I feel that I know little more than when we started back in march.

So much sitting around waiting, I think all up we've probably heard no more than 2-3 full days in evidence, being that we should hear 4 1/2 worth of evidence each days sittings.

There has been no smoking guns.

Closed court sessions , make it hard to know what evidence is being heard & weather they are getting any worthwhile evidence.

Mr Craddock has an extremely slow style, any slower we'd be hearing him talk in reverse :rolleyes:
 
  • #468
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Evidence against Bill Spedding discredited in William Tyrrell inquest.
 
  • #469
Thanks to everyone for such good discussion over the last week. I haven’t had much to contribute but have been grateful for the discussion here.
Have to say though that I’m a little bit devastated that websleuths will possibly be offline just as Spedding hits the witness box. What bad timing

If anything notable happens in that testimony, we can take the discussion to the WS FB pages.
 
  • #470
If you mean with the website being down this weekend ... Tricia 'hopes' it will be up on Monday (US time) so sometime Tuesday our (Aus) time. And that is barring any unforeseen issues with the repairs. Could be even longer.
We can take this discussion to the WS Facebook pages if the site is still down. :)
 
  • #471
We can take this discussion to the WS Facebook pages if the site is still down. :)

We could... except then we don’t remain anonymous
 
  • #472
  • #473
We could... except then we don’t remain anonymous
Oh, I have a fake FB that I use to look at WS cases. I assumed others did as well. lol
 
  • #474
The likelihood that the perfect crime has been committed is so low. It would have needed to be so well planned, and even then there were variables that could not have been controlled (ie. when would William be alone, when would all the neighbours be occupied and not watching, etc).

It is far more likely that certain conditions randomly came together to set the scene for an unplanned crime (although probably fantasised about and rehearsed in different ways in the perpetrator’s mind). So then Occam’s Razor comes into play.. who just happened to be there when William ran down (?) the hill on that fateful day? PS would be the most obvious and is therefore no.1 on my list. BS had reason to have been there (delivering the spare part). RD was also in the area and quite possibly could have chosen to drive/walk down Benaroon Drive given his likely close proximity and happened upon William.

But coming back to Occam’s Razor, PS is the most likely suspect. And considering the lack of anyone to confirm his alibi and his obvious inconsistencies, I can understand why he was a focus for Jubelin. IMO
 
  • #475
PS's testimony was really sketchy. And he had the perfect location and circumstances to commit this awful deed.

But he has no prior history of sexual crimes, as far as we know. It seems odd that a man never acts out for 60 plus years, and then suddenly kidnaps and kills a young neighbor child. It seems so unlikely to me.
 
  • #476
The likelihood that the perfect crime has been committed is so low. It would have needed to be so well planned, and even then there were variables that could not have been controlled (ie. when would William be alone, when would all the neighbours be occupied and not watching, etc).

It is far more likely that certain conditions randomly came together to set the scene for an unplanned crime (although probably fantasised about and rehearsed in different ways in the perpetrator’s mind). So then Occam’s Razor comes into play.. who just happened to be there when William ran down (?) the hill on that fateful day? PS would be the most obvious and is therefore no.1 on my list. BS had reason to have been there (delivering the spare part). RD was also in the area and quite possibly could have chosen to drive/walk down Benaroon Drive given his likely close proximity and happened upon William.

But coming back to Occam’s Razor, PS is the most likely suspect. And considering the lack of anyone to confirm his alibi and his obvious inconsistencies, I can understand why he was a focus for Jubelin. IMO
And we are 100% sure he was there that day unlike the other ones mentioned..BS and Donohoe.
If PS did grab William and was seen he could have said I found him wandering the street and was just about to bring him home.
 
  • #477
PS's testimony was really sketchy. And he had the perfect location and circumstances to commit this awful deed.

But he has no prior history of sexual crimes, as far as we know. It seems odd that a man never acts out for 60 plus years, and then suddenly kidnaps and kills a young neighbor child. It seems so unlikely to me.
I agree it is unlikely, but not impossible. If somebody had certain urges and fantasies that they controlled their whole lives, perhaps the deterioration of frontal lobe function that often happens in older age means that judgement can be impaired. Although uncommon, there are a number of men who are convicted of their first sexual offence in their older years. IMO
 
  • #478
Wow ... how great is that! We are back in time for the continuation of the inquest this week!!! :D :) :D
 
  • #479
PS's testimony was really sketchy. And he had the perfect location and circumstances to commit this awful deed.

But he has no prior history of sexual crimes, as far as we know. It seems odd that a man never acts out for 60 plus years, and then suddenly kidnaps and kills a young neighbor child. It seems so unlikely to me.

Although, we do not know if he has ever had accusations of prior crimes against children ... something that police are likely to know, or have been able to research and find out.

I just can't help but wonder about this, due to his hour and a half of closed court testimony.

I also wonder if the closed court testimony involved the 4 phone recordings done by Jubes.
 
Last edited:
  • #480
While we were down, Lia Harris released another podcast.

Faded Memories
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
83
Guests online
2,317
Total visitors
2,400

Forum statistics

Threads
632,764
Messages
18,631,454
Members
243,290
Latest member
lhudson
Back
Top