- Joined
- Aug 9, 2012
- Messages
- 33,178
- Reaction score
- 217,286
I'm not meaning to be contrary but the exact opposite has been used to describe an opportunistic abductor as well. Poor impulse control, lots of other petty crimes and psychological hurdles to overcome before acting on impulse and doing such an act. Usually socially inept, 23 up to 45 y.o. male and then the risk starts to decrease past this age. MOO
Edit to say the following description in the article is very specific and I'm sure correct probably, “I’ve interviewed lots of men in prisons all over the world that have abducted and murdered children. My PhD is in men that abduct, sexually abuse and murder children.
No worries, not seeing your opinion as contrary.
I wonder if the difference is that an older perp may have had the years of experience to conceal this crime, and William, for so many years.
Whereas one with opposite traits might have been caught quite soon.
I remember at one point we were considering that maybe a teen kid could have taken William. If the teen was wandering to the forest to spend the day if they were skipping school or unemployed.
imo
Last edited: