OK.. I feel like the proverbial salmon swimming upstream here and I KNOW folks are going to be ticked at my post.. but respectfully.. this is my opinion on this book. Here goes...
I have long admired Ann Rule's work and naively thought she did her homework on the cases she spoke/wrote about. By including Casey's "guilt" in this latest book, she has made it blatantly clear that she hasn't bothered to wait for most of the evidence nor rebuttal from any of the defense experts. She took some information, didn't bother to hear the other side of the story/evidence and ran with it. The book is already in print and that doesn't happen overnight.. she hadn't even had the benefit of the multitude of document dumps like we have had to determine the evidence against Casey, let alone bothering to hear the defense's rebuttal against the evidence, before she had determined (IN PRINT) that Casey is guilty and more importantly "WHY" she did it. More evidence, more information is still coming.. heck.. neither the defense OR the prosecution has even finished gathering all the evidence yet.
Yes, I 100%, completely believe Casey is guilty as well.. however I am open to hearing new evidence, new takes on the information and evidence available before I make my mind up completely about how and why it happened. Which frankly is very important if you are going to put a book into print that proclaims someone did something because of a specific reason and you use it to tie into some other famous cases. (Diane and Susan). It's called "waiting till you have enough information to actually prove your point". Whether or not Casey is guilty.. becomes a moot point. The whole thing just reeks of bias and reworking the "facts" to support your theory instead of writing the truth.
Ann Rule's book is extremely disillusioning because it's blatantly obvious that facts do not play an important part in Ann Rule's ability to claim someone is guilty, nor does it appear that she bothers to learn all the information before she makes a snap judgment about a situation. It makes all the other information she writes about people.. suspect.
In light of the last few large document docs and the information we have learned through the jailhouse letters regarding how Cindy and KC interact with each other which make it increasingly obvious that Caylee was killed to spite Cindy or as a result of the relationship with her mother and NOT because of love for Tony Lazaaro and Casey wanting the perfect relationship as Ann Rule claims and tries unsuccessfully to tie in with the other two mothers, Diane and Susan. In my eyes, Ann Rule just ruined every shred of credibility with me.. and is now firmly in the realm of being willing to say anything to try and cash in on Casey's current notoriety. I would still read her books.. but she has dropped down to National Enquirer status and reading her work is now for entertainment and curiosity rather than believing that it is a well-researched factual book.
Ann Rule just hired on as one of the circus acts.. IMO
wild