Interesting discussion on why the jury isn't asking questions about the children.
Where are they?
Do they know?
1 The judge filters which questions by the jury are made part of the trial, so I don't assume the jury is failing to ask. Instead, I would expect all questions about the children have been discarded.
2 I think the jury does not know about ANY of the ID events ...
3 ... and I suspect the judge intends to keep it that way.
Why? The fact that the kids are dead and LVD (as well as CD) have been convicted of doing it has no direct bearing on the truth of whether LVD conspired to kill CV. This is a separate crime she's being tried for. Yet such info would probably be considered impossibly prejudicial to the ability of the jury to make an objective ruling re CV's death -- they would be so inflamed that they would vote her guilty, regardless of evidence BARD.
And let me add that if the judge DID let that info into the trial, or the state slipped it in, it sure seems like great grounds for appeal (assuming LVD was found guilty after that). Of course, if LVD mentioned it to the jury, that's on her, but I doubt she would ever admit such a thing (she's the victim of family tragedies, as both her kids died through no fault of her own, in her version of events.)
So I think the judge is stifling any such questions and will continue to do so. Then again, the jury may just assume there has been an awful (but not illegal) family tragedy that happened later, leaving them no reason to pry.