AZ - Lori Vallow Daybell charged w/ conspiring to kill ex-husband Charles Vallow and another relative, Brandon Boudreaux, Chandler, Maricopa County #2

Status
Not open for further replies.
I was working while listening to the hearing and didn’t catch everything but yesterday (Monday) LVD stated that the subpoenas for defense witnesses were in the hands of OPDS (I am guessing that is office of public defender services or something like that) and should be being served “currently”. Was that an attempt to say they should be served that day? Was there any indication given as to when she filed the request for those subpoenas? Also I know the judge precluded some witnesses, but can anyone tell me which ones he did or did not? I heard him say something about someone also being on the state’s list so they wouldn’t be precluded a couple of times and heard him say if they hadn’t been subpoenaed that they couldn’t be compelled to show up and something about she wouldn’t be allowed to call anyone who had not sat down with the state for questions. So in effect that may preclude everyone who isn’t on the state’s list but I didn’t actually hear him say that or give a date that the subpoenas must be served by - though it seems I recall him saying previously that her whole list was already late. But then LVD’s statement about subpoenas being served currently and his response seemed to leave room that he might allow them if they sit down with the state before being called. Anyway, can someone clear up for me who has already been precluded and who remains as possible defense witnesses?

Also, wouldn’t the OPDS rely on the local sheriff’s departments to serve those subpoenas - at least to those who do not live in Maricopa County? No way could our local sheriff’s department get them served the same day they received them - they’d be lucky if the first attempt was within a week. Surely standby counsel advised LVD that those subpoena’s should have gone out long ago.
 
Lori put her nephew (Adam's son), her mother and her sister on her witness list, but neither want to testify. She also has her father on the list, who the prosecution could not reach. The judge did say something to the effect that those who don't show up to be interviewed would be precluded.

Rachel Smith said in her interview with Nate Eaton that Rob Wood had been predesignated to cross-examine Lori at the Idaho trial, because of her very flirty attitude towards potential male jurors.

 
I listened to yesterday's hearing, but have to catch up on today's, but already I know, at the bottom of my heart, that this is going to be one long slog with Lori defending herself. I hope the Judge has lots of support!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
165
Guests online
549
Total visitors
714

Forum statistics

Threads
625,584
Messages
18,506,593
Members
240,818
Latest member
wilson.emily3646
Back
Top