- Joined
- Jul 30, 2004
- Messages
- 6,761
- Reaction score
- 17,028
Quote
Being a good parents is not a safety zone
May I please ask you are you a parent?
Being a good parents is not a safety zone
May I please ask you are you a parent?
Which makes the placement of the belt on the stairs even more curious to me. Was the boy expecting more spankings and this time with a belt? What do we know about the spankings the night before? Were they with an open hand or an object?
Quote
Being a good parents is not a safety zone
May I please ask you are you a parent?
Quote
Even 5 days after the murders, both the DA and the boy's own defense attorney, said they had uncovered no abuse.
That was 5 days after the murder.Not now.More people have been spoken too.
They have talked and have recieved more information from people.
You don't have to leave bruises if the threat of abuse is present. He could have easily been threatening to use the belt on him and it be considered abuse. He didn't actually have to hit him. Mental abuse is sometimes worse than physical abuse. If he was returning home from work, it is possible he had told the child to do things that did not get done and he was expecting the worst from his father.I have no clue but they must not have left any bruises whatsoever. LE learned this very early and the bruises, if any, would have still been there to the naked eye. When they found out about the spanking I am sure they checked the boy like they do in other cases. They said the very next day that they would be investigating to see if there was any abuse in the case. Even 5 days after the murders, both the DA and the boy's own defense attorney, said they had uncovered no abuse.
I don't know if the belt has any relevancy at all. Clothes and other items were strewn all around that home. It could have been dropped there and they didn't even realize it if they took some clothes upstairs. I have no clue who the belt even belonged to all I know Vincent had Carhartt overalls on the day he died and a belt is not worn with overalls. Imo, VR came into his home, shut the door because it was in the 50s and proceeded up the stairs to his bedroom to take all of his construction gear off for the day and he never made it.
I have not heard any mention of the belt even being an issue in this case.
imoo
You don't have to leave bruises if the threat of abuse is present. He could have easily been threatening to use the belt on him and it be considered abuse. He didn't actually have to hit him. Mental abuse is sometimes worse than physical abuse. If he was returning home from work, it is possible he had told the child to do things that did not get done and he was expecting the worst from his father.
I agree.He could have even used this belt the night before.
What did she use?Doesn't mean a belt was never used to hit this little boy.We don't know.An abuser always threatens.
That seems a little far fetched to me, SS and certainly no motive to murder two people! I wouldn't think an abuser would just threaten. If they were an abuser they would just do it but there is no evidence that this father was an abuser of any sort. From what has been said, even by the biological mother, he and his father went everywhere together. Most abusers don't hang out with the abused child. They isolate them from friends (which this boy had) and suppress them. They don't think enough of the child to support them in much of anything. This boy seemed to be doted on. He got to go hunting, fishing, play soccer, football, play video games and even had a ATV.
imoo
Here's the police report, in case you haven't read it.
http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2008/12/04/20081204stjohns1204.html