Ms Suzanne
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2004
- Messages
- 6,761
- Reaction score
- 1,698
who's belt was this on the stairway?
I thought the casings were found around where the bodies were located?
imoo
You can also see a very good picture of the gun in this same slide show.
It shows it is not a big or a cumbersome weapon at all but extremely lightweight and easy to handle.
imoo
After seeing those photos of the crime scene, something is just "off".
Where exactly did they find the men?
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzannec4444 [
I am finding it very convenient all the casing were found right there near this little boys gun.
Yes,Near the bodies.His gun was right inside the door near Mr Romans body also.why would this kid just leave all this stuff out?
It's an extremely slow weapon, by today's standards, requiring at LEAST six seconds, by a right handed expert, to use proficiently. It is a chipmonk, or cricket, .22 single action (load, aim, fire, bolt back, reload, bolt forward, firing pin rod pulled back, aim, and fire) rifle that weights 2.5 pounds and is 30" long. Certainly not the weapon of choice for a killer.
I agree. How did TR get shot in the left elbow? You can see how he took the chest shots if the child was hiding in the house, but the left elbow is weird to me. Also, I doubt he got out on the passenger side. He was probably getting stuff out of the truck from that side.
Also, how is it he opened the screen door but when he falls he does not cross the threshold? I don't think this is possible. You have to be within a certain distance and very few people would have arms long enough to open the screen and fall forward without having, at a minimum, your head cross the threshold. I think the screen was pushed open from the inside by whoever was hiding in there.
Salem
Shock - do you think the gun could have had a fixed chamber, where you could load the bullets in, about 7-8 at a time so that you did not have to reload after each shot, but the bullet would enter the chamber when the bolt was pulled back? I'm sure I'm not using all the correct terminology here, but hopefully you understand what I am asking?
TIA,
Salem
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzannec4444 [
I am finding it very convenient all the casing were found right there near this little boys gun.
Yes,Near the bodies.His gun was right inside the door near Mr Romans body also.why would this kid just leave all this stuff out?
Was that a bottle of booze on the kitchen counter in the photo? Hard to tell as it could be say cooking oil or something else.
What is on the table? Why are shells just laying on what appears to be the coffee table? Were the guns and ammo just left out all over the house?
That makes no sense imo. The father was shot in the back and in the elbow.......not the front. I don't think he ever saw the person who killed him unless he was conscious enough when they stood close to him and fired the two shots to his head.
imo
There are so many posters here and on other sites that absolutely don't want to believe this boy killed two people. Somehow they want to believe the boy was either abused or set up. There are accusations blaming the mother, the father, the step-mother, even Tim Romans.
Evidence re: shooting doesn't lie. The town has supported the victims and has told the goodness of the father, his involvment with the boy in sports, etc. The lawyers, LE, the judge do not dispute the boy did this. There's no evidence of abuse. The boy could say he was abused, but this does not make it so. 1000 swats does not make it the truth.
It really is hard to believe an 8 yr old planned this, but it seems he did this. The evaluation will, undoubtedly, reveal mental problems. Hopefully, the boy will get help, but it will be a long process.
Well what if the father was walking down the stairs with the belt in his hand and was like "get down here boy" and then the boy shot him from behind?
Which makes the placement of the belt on the stairs even more curious to me. Was the boy expecting more spankings and this time with a belt? What do we know about the spankings the night before? Were they with an open hand or an object?He was walking up the stairs when shot, not down when he was shot in the back and elbow. He had on Carhartt overalls and was fully dressed in his full construction attire. You don't wear a belt with overalls.
imoo
Trino - I am one of these posters of which you speak. I am not accusing anyone of anything, but I am doing a lot of speculating because I DO NOT want to believe that an 8 year old would plan and carry out such a ruthless killing of 2 men for no reason. I'm not saying it is impossible, but I am saying I am not going to believe it until I know all the facts and if the boy did it, I want to know why! This is a horrible crime - did the boy do it for no reason? Maybe? I honestly don't know, but I do know I don't want to believe it and I will not believe it until I am assured that everything and anything has been looked at and analyzed. Remember the two boys that confessed to killing the little girl? But they didn't and DNA proved it. Anyway you slice this cake - we are talking about a child with a child's cognitive abilities and a limited understanding of life - not an adult. I think it is only prudent to investigate this carefully and thoroughly and if the end result is that the child did it, then we should be able to say why at the end of the day.
Was the child born with out a conscious or did he learn this somewhere? In my mind this is a nature vs. nurture case.
As an aside - I keep an open mind as to the men's reputation for now. Folks who appear to be good folks may not be as evidenced by the girl scout leader with the lovely family webpage that was keeping and torturing a 17 year old in CA. I bet her neighbors all thought she was just "the nicest person" too.
As an aside, my son thought the boy may have gained extra skill in his steady hand by playing x-box and other video games.
Salem
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.