Bankrupt Casey Anthony interviewed by KPHO CBS in Phoenix

Status
Not open for further replies.
What I don't understand is how one can file for bankruptcy for something that MIGHT happen. Like ZG might get awarded $100,000.00, so I want to wipe that out. How is that different from filing for bankruptcy after big medical bills, and including the operation you MIGHT have to have in the future. Can anybody simplify that concept for me?

I'm telling ya! Let's all go down and file for the inevitable bills we will all see in the future. Anticipating a surgery? Bankruptcy! Think you might want to stop paying on your credit cards? Bankruptcy! Fearing losing your job? Bankruptcy! Just go ahead and file for anything that MIGHT come up in the future. Then we can all party.
 
Seems to me that if it is normal to list debts you anticipate but have not even incurred yet, you should have to list income you anticipate but have not received yet. In short, if a debt that happens--let's say six months or a year from now--can be listed as a debt and is dischargeable now, then any future windfall that happens within a similar time period should be required to be listed under income. Her anticipated future income could be listed as "amount unknown" just like they are allowing her anticipated future debts to be listed. If this case is handled differently by the bankruptcy court than anyone else's case, would that not open a large and exceptionally smelly can of worms?

Ack! What am I thinking? It has been made crystal clear that Ms. Anthony is entitled to special treatment.
 
I'm telling ya! Let's all go down and file for the inevitable bills we will all see in the future. Anticipating a surgery? Bankruptcy! Think you might want to stop paying on your credit cards? Bankruptcy! Fearing losing your job? Bankruptcy! Just go ahead and file for anything that MIGHT come up in the future. Then we can all party.

Good idea! There's a super expensive luxury cruise line I can't afford to book with. That solved that problem.... :great: If I ever go bankrupt I'll be sure and book a suite.
 
That is good to know, or at least hope for. Is it possible they will want to know where it came from? For instance, if she received $100,000 from CA & GA, would that come out? And, would they then want to know how CA & GA could afford to give her such a "gift"? Of course, I am hoping it will come out if she has been receiving monies from Caylee's Fund. Wishful thinking that their house of lies is about to implode.

I am still waiting for ONE reporter to probe into the Anthonys' Caylee defunct foundation and tell us where all that money, supposedly donated for charitable purposes, has gone to.. of all the reporters/ media journalists I have emailed about it, none have taken it up. I'm hoping Kathi Belich will do it one day.
 
I do not think a reporter will do much investigating. We live in different times now and if something falls into their lap they might run with it but I have lost faith in reporters doing the legwork to actively seek out the truth.

As for the bankruptcy, I do believe the court will question some things and may request documentation of some things. But for the most part they will just accept the answers given as truth, IMO. In short, the bankruptcy court will question but not actually investigate or demand much. Investigating and demanding proof can, however, be taken up by one or more of the creditors. It depends on how interested any of them are in righting some wrongs.
 
Will Leonard Padilla help investigate the bankruptcy filing? Like maybe there's a daisy chain of debts to uncover? Or is his story arc complete at this point?

Maybe he can hire PI Dominic Casey to investigate
I wonder if Baez ever paid him? I didn't see his name listed as a Creditor in OCA's BK filing.
He filed a Bar complaint against Baez for ethics violation and for non payment
 
I am still waiting for ONE reporter to probe into the Anthonys' Caylee defunct foundation and tell us where all that money, supposedly donated for charitable purposes, has gone to.. of all the reporters/ media journalists I have emailed about it, none have taken it up. I'm hoping Kathi Belich will do it one day.

I've been harping about this on Hals blog. Everyone seems to be reporting everything team FCA wants us to know while they all nod their head in agreement, but no-one wants to ask the hard hitting questions or dig into the skeletons in the closet. Inquiring minds want to know ... what happened to the dr phil $$?
 
I've been harping about this on Hals blog. Everyone seems to be reporting everything team FCA wants us to know while they all nod their head in agreement, but no-one wants to ask the hard hitting questions or dig into the skeletons in the closet. Inquiring minds want to know ... what happened to the dr phil $$?

I agree, but must add...

No one, NO ONE ever asked any hard hitting question EVER

(except for Yuri /Belich- and that didn't work out so well)

So media, here we are again, in the midsts of sweeps, everybody looking for a good "get" (see Adam Longo's twitter feed)...

Enjoy your little gurl...
 
I've been harping about this on Hals blog. Everyone seems to be reporting everything team FCA wants us to know while they all nod their head in agreement, but no-one wants to ask the hard hitting questions or dig into the skeletons in the closet. Inquiring minds want to know ... what happened to the dr phil $$?

Tongue in cheek ( :floorlaugh: ) so, anyone on the jury been living high on the hog since the trial?

Just askin'! :jail:
 
ooooooh, dead in the water. One of Casey's specialties.

So what's next in line for the MOTY--motivational speaker?

Odd how everyone connected with this case seems to come up with the most unfortunate choice of words. :what:
 
as tempted as I am - and I am tempted - to respond point by point to the question you've posed, I. Shall. Refrain.

As much as I would wish for answers to these questions, we all know they would be nothing more than a lie - nothing more than Casey Anthony herself.

What's really skeeving me out is CMs insistence on calling her this "little girl." It's gotten really weird. I mean she's coming up on 27. Twenty seven. It's not even sweet and grandfatherly - it's skeevy. I am officially weirded out by this. Really, really weirded out

Jumping off your post for a couple of points:

1. I am very skeeved out too by this...wonder what his wife thinks of him when he calls FCA 'a little girl'. Blech!

2. Since I haven't yet seen anyone else mention this, when ya'll were talking about the photos on the Quinco Facebook page...did anyone elso see the 2 pics of Lee A. and someone playing 'beer pong' at the chili cookoff? Seems like that's all these Anthony's do...live off others and beer pong.
 
He said the lawsuits are dead unless the bankruptcy judge throws them a lifeline. “She’s not home-free,” Sheaffer said.

I'm sure hoping this happens - surely the timing is just too obvious for the Trustee or Judge to miss it.
 
I'm sure hoping this happens - surely the timing is just too obvious for the Trustee or Judge to miss it.

I hope it happens too but it is not going to happen on its own. There a meeting of the creditors coming up soon and that is when the creditors can show up and speak their piece. If none show up, it is usually interpreted to mean that they have accepted the discharge of what is owed them. Any creditor can show up and argue why theirs should not be discharged (or whatever) and then the judge may offer a lifeline based on any claim that has merit.

IMO at least some of what she owes Orange County might be subject to effective argument. That is not consumer debt--it resulted from suspicious behavior that led to dozens of lies that led to costly investigations. I do believe an argument could be made for that not being discharged and if it is worded properly it might even be successful.
 
I hope it happens too but it is not going to happen on its own. There a meeting of the creditors coming up soon and that is when the creditors can show up and speak their piece. If none show up, it is usually interpreted to mean that they have accepted the discharge of what is owed them. Any creditor can show up and argue why theirs should not be discharged (or whatever) and then the judge may offer a lifeline based on any claim that has merit.

IMO at least some of what she owes Orange County might be subject to effective argument. That is not consumer debt--it resulted from suspicious behavior that led to dozens of lies that led to costly investigations. I do believe an argument could be made for that not being discharged and if it is worded properly it might even be successful.

At least in AZ bankruptcy courts, I have never seen any discussion of dischargeability of debts at the meeting of creditors. Those issues are raised later, by motion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
233
Guests online
590
Total visitors
823

Forum statistics

Threads
625,834
Messages
18,511,381
Members
240,855
Latest member
du0tine
Back
Top