logicalgirl
Peace Hawk
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2009
- Messages
- 16,024
- Reaction score
- 2
Exactly. Ashton released his book soon after the verdict. His book served it's purpose .... to discuss the FACTS of the case and the EVIDENCE. He then moved on with his life. Baez, on the other hand is STILL out there peddling his book that is filled with speculation and innuendos.
Baez and mason are the ones always preaching and lecturing that everyone should move on, while they are the ones scoring interviews every other week thrusting her back into the forefront. They say one thing and do another. So which is it ... do they want us to forget about it and move on, or do they want to keep her in the spotlight to advance their own agendas?
Back to the subject of bankruptcy ... I still don't understand how baez can claim that he is owed $500,000. Has this been discussed here at WS and I just missed it?
My understanding is that because he was paid with the ABC money before the trial, he wasn't eligible for payment for his services from her indigent status.
So I bet it was pretty easy for him to throw together a 500K statement for services to carry throw the cost of his services through the hearings and trial. He was hoping to get paid when there was the big interview, movie, blah blah payoff that never happened and I suspect never will.
What's a lawyer like Baez to do?? Try it as a tax write-off and try to paint it as himself in a positive light.....:floorlaugh: as in poor me - all that work defending that poor little girl and I never did get paid - aren't I just a great guy?
Kind of like little jack horner and his sugar plum thumb...
Oh wait...was that little jack horner... :waitasec: