atherella
Where is Haleigh?
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2009
- Messages
- 1,981
- Reaction score
- 2
In all fairness...her ex-attorney would say anything at this juncture. A complaint was filed against her and she responded. There doesn't really have to be any truth to what she says. The burdon of proof has to be on the complainant. I've read here in this forum much more than I've posted...but I have to say no one and I mean no one knows what CP promised CS. I'm sure she promised a lot. IIRC she stated as much in early interviews. Let's remember she filed the motions. If she believed there was no merit to them then she should have advised her client of that. Instead, IMO she no doubt promised her the moon...and came up way short of delivering. JMHO
PS- IMO it's tacky for an attorney to take to the airwaves to speak about an ex-client. She should have taken the high road and rise above this.
While Kim is not my favorite person in this case, I don't think an attorney is going to lie in front of the disciplinary committee and risk being disbarred. You cannot just say "anything". There is a burden of proof that must be met.
You mentioned that Kim "filed the motions". What motions do you mean? Kim did not file any motions. I'm guessing that is part of the grounds upon which Crystal filed her complaint. When you read the bar's response to Crystal, it discusses how attorneys cannot file frivolous motions or pleadings and that this falls within an attorney's discretion. It is the attorney that would be disciplined and/or sanctioned for doing so. Kim gave the bar the reasons that she did not file the motion that Crystal wanted Kim to file and the bar clearly agreed with Kim's reasoning.
Crystal has had a new attorney since July. Said attorney has not filed any of those motions either.
I do agree that attorneys do not belong in the media discussing a client's case. However, an attorney works for the client. If a client does not approve of an attorney's action, the client needs to express her displeasure to the attorney.