Bar Complaint Against Former Lawyer Picazio Filed By Crystal Sheffiel

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #221
May I ask you how finding this out helps us to understand what happen to HaLeigh? I respectfully disagree with the majority of your post (and to be honest don't even understand what you mean by much of it) because MOST people that I know could give 2 chits whether she lied about it or not since it has no bearing on HaLeigh's disappearance, therefore it changes my views on nothing [respectfully snipped] I don't defend Ron because I believe (as in, it is MO ) that he did have something to do with with HaLeighs disappearance AND HaLeigh was living with he and Misty at the time of her disappearance, therefore it is like comparing apples and oranges, unless as I have posted numerous times, that you believe Crystal had something to do with it. Do you believe that?

All I am seeing is people thrilled to death to have possibly caught her in a lie, mind you a lie about something that has nothing to do with HaLeighs disappearance. Is this what it has come down to? If so, then I want no part of it myself. I truly am stunned at the mindset of some....not that it matters to anyone...I just don't even know what to say to this carp, so perhaps it would be best to say nothing..........

Perhaps you haven't been reading the threads I have seen in which Ron has been bashed relentlessly for taking Haleigh from her mother using underhanded means, by providing the wrong address so that Crystal couldn't appear. The next move in that argument is usually that had Haleigh been in her mother's custody, she would still be with us (regardless of the fact that Ron would have had visitation, at least and would have been in the same physical location for extended periods of time).

I don't for one minute think that the custody and child support issues are not germane to the case, particularly at the beginning as LE begins to look simultaneously at the family/families and also at the possibility of stranger abduction. Many, if not most, "missing children" cases can be traced back to animosity between the bio parents or attempts to circumvent court-ordered custody arrangements. Sadly, there are parents who kill their children to avoid paying support or to get back at their former partners. And there are grandparents who have killed ex-spouses and kidnapped children. So I am sure LE has looked long and hard at all the families in this case (including the step-parents and their relatives) because as in all crimes, the odds are that someone who knows the child is involved.

Because you believe that Ron "did have something to do with with Haleigh's disappearance," it is not surprising that you don't see Crystal's behavior in regard to custody, or her family's interests in regard to custody and support, as significant. You've already eliminated them from the suspect pool.

I know there are people who hope that Crystal's family is behind the abduction because that would mean that Haleigh is alive; that is less, I think, about her family and more about holding on to hope. The only way I think that would be possible is if they intended to take both kids and couldn't do that because Jr. was asleep in Misty's bed--although I suppose it is possible that someone might have more attachment to Haleigh than her brother. But that seems like a stretch to me.

I don't think that looking at both parents is like "comparing apples to oranges." The fact that Crystal lost custody and her family was upset about that could be a powerful motive for abduction, just as the fact that the kids were living with Ron gave him or Misty more opportunity for something to happen to the kids at their hands. I don't know who took Haleigh. I lean towards a sexual predator in large part because I think LE would have solved the case already if anyone in Crystal's or Ron's family was involved. (I am excluding the Croslin clan here.) I also believe that Ron was at work when Haleigh disappeare, based on what is known at this time. I remain ready to change my mind if the evidence warrants it.

But I will say that those who were wrong about Ron's actions in regard to custody may have misjudged him in other ways as well--and those judgments are important to our discussion. As always, thanks for replying to my post.
 
  • #222
Perhaps you haven't been reading the threads I have seen in which Ron has been bashed relentlessly for taking Haleigh from her mother using underhanded means, by providing the wrong address so that Crystal couldn't appear. The next move in that argument is usually that had Haleigh been in her mother's custody, she would still be with us (regardless of the fact that Ron would have had visitation, at least and would have been in the same physical location for extended periods of time).

I don't for one minute think that the custody and child support issues are not germane to the case, particularly at the beginning as LE begins to look simultaneously at the family/families and also at the possibility of stranger abduction. Many, if not most, "missing children" cases can be traced back to animosity between the bio parents or attempts to circumvent court-ordered custody arrangements. Sadly, there are parents who kill their children to avoid paying support or to get back at their former partners. And there are grandparents who have killed ex-spouses and kidnapped children. So I am sure LE has looked long and hard at all the families in this case (including the step-parents and their relatives) because as in all crimes, the odds are that someone who knows the child is involved.

Because you believe that Ron "did have something to do with with Haleigh's disappearance," it is not surprising that you don't see Crystal's behavior in regard to custody, or her family's interests in regard to custody and support, as significant. You've already eliminated them from the suspect pool.

I know there are people who hope that Crystal's family is behind the abduction because that would mean that Haleigh is alive; that is less, I think, about her family and more about holding on to hope. The only way I think that would be possible is if they intended to take both kids and couldn't do that because Jr. was asleep in Misty's bed--although I suppose it is possible that someone might have more attachment to Haleigh than her brother. But that seems like a stretch to me.

I don't think that looking at both parents is like "comparing apples to oranges." The fact that Crystal lost custody and her family was upset about that could be a powerful motive for abduction, just as the fact that the kids were living with Ron gave him or Misty more opportunity for something to happen to the kids at their hands. I don't know who took Haleigh. I lean towards a sexual predator in large part because I think LE would have solved the case already if anyone in Crystal's or Ron's family was involved. (I am excluding the Croslin clan here.) I also believe that Ron was at work when Haleigh disappeare, based on what is known at this time. I remain ready to change my mind if the evidence warrants it.

But I will say that those who were wrong about Ron's actions in regard to custody may have misjudged him in other ways as well--and those judgments are important to our discussion. As always, thanks for replying to my post.

First, great post!

Second, my bold of your point, I thought about this too. Did someone get interrupted after getting out with Haleigh? Maybe the person that took her required only a female to fulfill their need? Lots to speculate about, little to offer for proof. I know this though. I woke up this morning, fixed my coffee and sat down to watch the news.

Imagine my disgust at seeing my 11 year old daughter's former Physical Education teacher's face plastered on my screen. Arrested and jailed for sodomizing a child under the age of 12. This is disgusting and unacceptable. My 16 year old son came home from school one day last year and told me that my daughter had a crush on her PE teacher. Those words came rushing back this morning and now, on the advice of the school district all parents are being asked to talk with their children and ask if there was ever any inappropriate contact going on!!!!

Thank God we no longer live in that school district. My point is, our children are never safe. It isn't enough to keep track of where the sex offenders live in your town. Your neighbor could be waiting for just the right moment to pounce and take what was once only their sick thoughts and turn them into their actions.
 
  • #223
according to KP, it was "the blogger" that is now the "family spokesperson." I don't know who the blogger is.
me either i wish i could find out lol im nosey
 
  • #224
can anyone tell me if Crystal is claiming that KP disclosed personal and confidential information while she (KP) still worked for Crystal or after she was gone?

Just wondering if anyone knew the answer to this, i have been looking for the answer but i haven't found one yet.
 
  • #225
me either i wish i could find out lol im nosey

So who IS speaking for CS now? Wouldn't that be easy enough to find out?
 
  • #226
Just wondering if anyone knew the answer to this, i have been looking for the answer but i haven't found one yet.
Do you mean in the bar complaint? I would think she would mean while Kim was her attorney. But that is just MO.
 
  • #227
Do you mean in the bar complaint? I would think she would mean while Kim was her attorney. But that is just MO.

Google Kim and there is a story and it mentions 2 peoples names that are involved in this case. I do not know where I saw it, but I was surprise it came up very easily, and I wonder who these people are...Do we know them?
 
  • #228
Do you mean in the bar complaint? I would think she would mean while Kim was her attorney. But that is just MO.


Hi there, Yes in the bar complaint one of the issues was that Crystal said KP disclosed personal and private information. I am wanting to know if KP disclosed this information while she was still working for Crystal, or if she started talking and saying things she should have kept private after she no longer worked for Crystal. It would seem to me that even if KP wasn't under contract with Crystal anymore, she still couldn't release personal and private information, so I want to know did KP blab before or after? lol. Do you understand what I mean....lol?
 
  • #229
Google Kim and there is a story and it mentions 2 peoples names that are involved in this case. I do not know where I saw it, but I was surprise it came up very easily, and I wonder who these people are...Do we know them?


I googled Kim Picazio and only thing I get is the blogger news network. I am confused.
 
  • #230
The complete set of documents are available now on the bar complaint.

http://www.thesky973.com/pages/5686083.php

It has the

*Initial Complaint

*Respondent Letter

*Certificate of Disclosure

*Response to 15 day Letter

*Complainant Ltr - Fwding Copy of

*Rebuttal of Complainant

*Correspondence from Respondent

*Complainant Ltr - Close All Documents Reviewed No Violations

Lot of reading.
 
  • #231
Uh Oh, I didn't finish all my chores yet!
 
  • #232
The complete set of documents are available now on the bar complaint.

http://www.thesky973.com/pages/5686083.php

It has the

*Initial Complaint

*Respondent Letter

*Certificate of Disclosure

*Response to 15 day Letter

*Complainant Ltr - Fwding Copy of

*Rebuttal of Complainant

*Correspondence from Respondent

*Complainant Ltr - Close All Documents Reviewed No Violations

Lot of reading.
WOW! I have finished the first doc and on to the second. There is some quite eye opening statements in these docs, imo. Holy Toledo! Are we going to start a new thread for discussion after it's all read? Because from what I have seen so far it's gonna be a BOMBSHELL! IMO, To quote NG.
 
  • #233
WOW! I have finished the first doc and on to the second. There is some quite eye opening statements in these docs, imo. Holy Toledo! Are we going to start a new thread for discussion after it's all read? Because from what I have seen so far it's gonna be a BOMBSHELL! IMO, To quote NG.

I am still reading Kim's 26 page (I think it is the) "Response to 15 day Letter".

:eek:

We have been told SO MANY LIES over the course of this case.

And yes... BOMBSHELLS for sure.

Wish we could find HaLeigh. Grrrr!!!
 
  • #234
I am still reading Kim's 26 page (I think it is the) "Response to 15 day Letter".

:eek:

We have been told SO MANY LIES over the course of this case.

And yes... BOMBSHELLS for sure.

Wish we could find HaLeigh. Grrrr!!!

I just started the response letter, did someone save these files just in case they disappear?
 
  • #235
very very sad for beautiful Shaniya
 
  • #236
Wow. plain meanness.
 
  • #237
very very sad for beautiful Shaniya

I know this is OT. I am SO HEARTBROKEN for her and her REAL family.

Her father must be feeling SO GUILTY. All the "what ifs". I cannot even imagine the pain and heartache he must be feeling.

I had such HIGH HOPES she would be found. People are just SO SICK. What a beautiful little girl she was. I'm just sick they found her. :(
 
  • #238
I know this is OT. I am SO HEARTBROKEN for her and her REAL family.

Her father must be feeling SO GUILTY. All the "what ifs". I cannot even imagine the pain and heartache he must be feeling.

I had such HIGH HOPES she would be found. People are just SO SICK. What a beautiful little girl she was. I'm just sick they found her. :(

O/T Ugh, it is very very sad, She was so alive in those few surveillance pictures, there is no mistaking that. What a horrible horrible outcome for her. I pray everyone goes and does their part to stand behind Mark Klaas and speak out to get this Truckers Network approved. God bless Shaniya and everyone who loves her.
 
  • #239
Wow, I am starting to read this crap and I am totally disgusted.
 
  • #240
It just astounds me the lengths that were gone to by some to sway public opinion of CS. Lies, lies and more lies. Did they think this would just go one forever and no one would question it, no one would ever find out what they were doing? It didn't matter who got trashed or who got hurt, as long as CS was made to look like an angel. It boggles the mind. And people did this deliberately! All MOO.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
81
Guests online
1,845
Total visitors
1,926

Forum statistics

Threads
632,476
Messages
18,627,318
Members
243,164
Latest member
thtguuurl
Back
Top