Didn't Igor, later in his testimony, say it was the tall guy who asked? I assumed he got mixed up at the beginning.
I read it both ways, I'm not sure if it was tweeted that Igor said it both ways or the media mixed up the story.
Didn't Igor, later in his testimony, say it was the tall guy who asked? I assumed he got mixed up at the beginning.
Yes imo he said it because he obviously worked on and/or was used to dealing with them in the Army. Thats my opinion. Just confirming he knows those engines doesn't really explain his full knowledge. When you explain the army it gives a clearer picture as it is understood that much time may have been spent working with or on them IMHO.
Didn't Igor, later in his testimony, say it was the tall guy who asked? I assumed he got mixed up at the beginning.
I have to go back to double check but didn't more than one person say it was Evan?Actually, we only know who was using the phone for the last call. We don't know who was using it for the other calls, such as for when the phone was in Oakville and DM's phone hadn't made it to Oakville yet.
It may not matter who owned the phone, but in this particular case, we also don't know yet who "used the knife".
I read it both ways, I'm not sure if it was tweeted that Igor said it both ways or the media mixed up the story.
When he explained the Israeli army inference, more likely it gave the accused a clearer picture as to why Igor was not one to be messed with. Just my opinion, but I don't think DM then turning around to look at MS had anything to do about how impressive he thought Igor's knowledge about this type of engine must be.
I agree, I have seen it written up both ways, and I'm not sure if that is because of Igor or Twitter or...?
Actually, we only know who was using the phone for the last call. We don't know who was using it for the other calls, such as for when the phone was in Oakville and DM's phone hadn't made it to Oakville yet.
It may not matter who owned the phone, but in this particular case, we also don't know yet who "used the knife".
I have to go back to double check but didn't more than one person say it was Evan?
Igor and the other man who slept after arranging to meet?
Yes I agree so then if that's the case, at least twice he's identified himself over the burner phone?Dellen sounds like Evan if said quickly. It is a similar sounding name. I see no benefit to calling himself Evan as a alias when his middle name is Evan. It's still his given name.
This week in court will run from Monday to Friday because Monday the 15th is a holiday (Family Day). So 5 full days of testimony, hopefully.
Feb 1 2016 11:21 AM
Adam Carter
Goodman now talking about the schedule. We'll likely sit Monday to Thursday, with an "infrequent" Friday session. Will be sitting on Friday, Feb. 19 to make up for Family Day Monday though. Trial also breaks for March break.
Can you post links please as the only reports I read were that MS who was at first quiet like a fish, then asked what he did in the Israeli Army.
Yes I agree so then if that's the case, at least twice he's identified himself over the burner phone?
We don't know as there hasn't been evidence confirming. If he identified himself on a burner phone it would become clear he wasn't trying to be underhanded. Which is the point his lawyer is trying to make, I think. I also think the phone info is still up for debate, maybe tomorrows testimonies will help further.
I thought Igor said he introduced himself (when he arrived ) as 'Evan' ( Dellen )..will have to check
We don't know as there hasn't been evidence confirming. If he identified himself on a burner phone it would become clear he wasn't trying to be underhanded. Which is the point his lawyer is trying to make, I think. I also think the phone info is still up for debate, maybe tomorrows testimonies will help further.
I thought Igor said he introduced himself (when he arrived ) as 'Evan' ( Dellen )..will have to check
That's what I thought too. There was a photo posted of the location that was more close up, which I can no longer find. In the close up one, it more clearly showed that the evidence marker was inside the fence.
Two callers idetified the Lucas Bate phone caller as Evan, and that is evidence that has been presented already.
Two callers idetified the Lucas Bate phone caller as Evan, and that is evidence that has been presented already.
I dunno, sure both names end with -in sounds but DEL and EV are very distinct phonemes.
And should end there. Evidence presented in court seems to take all the nit-picking off the table for me. But hey, that's just me![]()