- Joined
- Jan 3, 2013
- Messages
- 2,829
- Reaction score
- 14,986
AM has a nice new tat going on.... The words say.. "I remember". Hmm
All comments are JMO unless stated otherwise
All comments are JMO unless stated otherwise
Well if CN is reading here: ever think why he was engaged to someone else and not you? Because he never wanted to marry you. JMO
AM has a nice new tat going on.... The words say.. "I remember". Hmm
All comments are JMO unless stated otherwise
IMO.......DM won't tell about CN's involvement because they(DM and CN) have been sending letters back and forth, singing on the phone and mommy MB has been passing on lots of info received over many bottles of wine. They have had 3 years to do this. The defense that CN and MB will come up with if ever held to the letter of the law is that they are not accountable for anything they have said with regard to obstruction of justice is because they were drunk and/or stoned and suffering from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Poor Babies.
That's my first thought since they have matching tats already. And texts exchanges between AM and DM it just feels to me like he's DM's little B****That gives me the creeps. Is it an answer to DM's tattoo, "don't you dare forget"? Is AM sending DM a message?
All MOO.
That's my first thought since they have matching tats already. And texts exchanges between AM and DM it just feels to me like he's DM's little B****
I am a new member. I have been following along for about a month and only joined WS a few days ago.
I wonder, in this day and age, why the witnesses can't sit in on the trial. It seems like an inconvenience that they have to read it on the net.
Is it possible, in the future, that all trials will go In Camera?
I think LE dropped the ball by charging CN so early. That painted her into as corner so all she could do is evoke her selective amnesia to protect herself, of which she did a stellar job, MOO.
I expect Crown to let her sweat till Oct. and then drop the charge. Unless they have a lot more than they showed so far.
Is it not Canadian law that even an accidental death in commission of a crime is murder 1?
I have a ? if you will, what does LE stand for. Thanks.
Yes I saw it. It's the words that stood out to me. Not the design.Did you see the tat? It's a full sleeve, not script like DM has.
Did you see the tat? It's a full sleeve, not script like DM has.
Not sure but don't care either. Poor taste IMO. Unless he's remembering TB which I highly doubt.. I think these heartless <modsnip> have done enough damage in a lifetimeAre we sure it is AM's arm? I wonder who the woman is in the tattoo? It is really disturbing to me that these characters put themselves out there with no filters like they don't care what anyone thinks, IMO. If this tattoo isn't a message for DM or others, why post it for all to see? I don't understand at all.
All MOO.
Are we sure it is AM's arm? I wonder who the woman is in the tattoo? It is really disturbing to me that these characters put themselves out there with no filters like they don't care what anyone thinks, IMO. If this tattoo isn't a message for DM or others, why post it for all to see? I don't understand at all.
All MOO.
WHERE ONE PARTY CANNOT BE CONVICTED
23.1 For greater certainty, sections 21 to 23 apply in respect of an accused notwithstanding the fact that the person whom the accused aids or abets, counsels or procures or receives, comforts or assists cannot be convicted of the offence. [R.S.C. 1985, c.24 (2nd Supp.), s.45.]
http://www.efc.ca/pages/law/cc/cc.23.1.html
To explain that, Section 23 of the Criminal Code applies to Accessory After the Fact. This provision is stating that it still applies even if the one who commits the initial crime is not able to be convicted for any reason.
There seems to be a fundamental misconception here. A judge or a jury can convict a defendant they don't believe is telling the truth.
Maybe Rabbit had a ringer on the other end?
Quote Originally Posted by Gibson67 View Post
but what if he did **** up...what if it was only meant to be a truck robbery and his anger got in the way and he pulled the trigger..then what? Do you really think he would get on the stand and tell the truth? Because this is what I think happened..we have heard from his own mouth that he told 3 people he ****ed up. CN, MM and BD. Then in DM's letters he says that Smich ****ed up a truck robbery. I am still certain that is what happened. I don't think it was in the plan to kill TB.
MM testified that she begged him not to go, and when he said he f'ed up, she felt he was referring to going on the mission in the first place.
It won't surprise me one bit if MS takes the stand to clear the fog left hanging in the courtroom by CN's testimony (and others). I have no doubt DM confided in MS and filled him in on what was discussed between him and CN, what she knew, her role and the lies she told on the stand to cover her own a$$ (DM's and MB also). In my post from the wee hours of this morning, I responded to MsSherlock's post suggesting it was MS who was with DM May 9th, to help him do whatever at the farmland and then load TB's truck into the trailer. These two were in cohoots and had a big secret to share so why wouldn't DM have informed MS that he confided in CN and was going to pick her up to help him with his "tiny mission" that night after DM dropped MS back off in Oakville, minutes prior to picking up CN. MS will be able to shed light on what CN knew about the truck theft and TB's murder. There were likely times she was present when DM and MS discussed their plans and after the fact. IMO I think MS could blow this case wide open and fill in so many blanks.
At this point MS has absolutely nothing to lose. I'm sure he is looking forward to having his version (the truth) of everything that happened during his stint of being DM goon and yes man heard. There can be no further damage to MS's character and his criminal past, drug and alcohol use, the fact he was a wannabe gangsta, working under the table for DM, helping DM carry out thefts, etc. It's all out in the open now so he has nothing to lose at this point. But that's JMO.