Breaking News Archive - 20th - 26th Aug

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #461
JDB said:
I just saw a Post from Scandi on another thread. She said she heard 1996 Christmas. It over folks Karr is not the one.


Yeah, but they will have to PROVE it was 1996, if the video is not dated on the screen.
 
  • #462
englishleigh said:
Yeah, but they will have to PROVE it was 1996, if the video is not dated on the screen.

I missed this?? Even with all my channel changing, sheesh. :doh:
 
  • #463
MSNBC is showing the video now and they are saying it is from 1987.
 
  • #464
Buzzm1 said:
I think this case is a very long way from a slam dunk, despite what Rita Crosby thinks she found out about Mary Lacy. This is such a strange situation, and JMK has been rehearsing his "in love" with Jon Benet for so long, it is very hard to know what the truth is at this point. It still might be one those proverbial "wild goose chases."

I don't think CA has dropped their charges, but I do believe they have willingly taken a back seat to CO.
The charges that may be dropped are the CO ones..the only for sure thing is CA. If his wife proves his innocence thru an alibi then he shoudnt even make it to denver..unless they hold him there for questioning and charge him with mischief or whatever they can charge him with.
He will remain in jail thot because he skipped out on his charges..he will get more time for that and he may be considered a more serious offender until they can sort out fact from fiction..and I mean that even if he has nothing to do with the JB murder.
He may be in jail along time as they investigate his relationship to many children-all children he has come in contact with over the years.
If he is shown to be a mulitple offender he will be locked up for a very long time-especially if he is saying he killed kids-they cant take a chance that he wont take that step some day.
 
  • #465
englishleigh said:
MSNBC is showing the video now and they are saying it is from 1987.
Close but no cigar.
 
  • #466
Hold on, I'm getting confused here. IS there a video?? Or are we just speculating?

Nevermind I see it now. They are not saying what year it is.
 
  • #467
I wouldn't be at all surprised if JMK is spirited out of LA today, without the media being at all aware of it. Whether he can arrive in CO without media awareness still remains to be seen. This three ring circus needs to end, the sooner, the better.
 
  • #468
MSNBC just showed a video obtained by The National Enquirer showing John Karr entertaining at a friend's wedding in 1987.
 
  • #469
englishleigh said:
Yeah, but they will have to PROVE it was 1996, if the video is not dated on the screen.
But lets see how long have we known about Karr? And still there is not one little bit of news about someone coming forward saying he was in Colo whn JBR was murdered. Do not get me wrong I want who ever did this caught and given the DP.But this one is to convient with PR just passing away 2 months ago.
 
  • #470
The video was from The National Enquirer. Wonder who sold it to them? Had to be a family member.
 
  • #471
MrsMush99 said:
Hold on, I'm getting confused here. IS there a video?? Or are we just speculating?

Nevermind I see it now. They are not saying what year it is.
They aren't going to put his kids in the picture, (3, 4, and 5, at that time) and without them in the picture for a reference, it will be difficult to tell what year it is.
 
  • #472
englishleigh said:
I didn't hear a year, either. My first thought was of Billy Ray Cyrus!! :crazy:
LOL!

According to MSNBC, the video was from a friend's wedding in 1987.
 
  • #473
Buzzm1 said:
They aren't going to put his kids in the picture, (3, 4, and 5, at that time) and without them in the picture for a reference, it will be difficult to tell what year it is.
Someone posted 1987
 
  • #474
When was the youngest son born? In the video of the Karrs standing outside, the youngest son looks to be quite young.....being held by Karr.

Karr looks very strange, even back then.
 
  • #475
On MSNBC they just showed the clip again and it is from the 80's when he had a friend get married. I saw no Christmas decorations. And the gal from MSNBC slipped in it was '87 but then someone else in the room said something to her almost off sound and she relied back. yes it was. So I still don't think this is proof of anything.

Scandi
 
  • #476
Buzzm1 said:
BANGKOK, Thailand Aug 21, 2006 (AP)— A suspect in the killing of JonBenet Ramsey visited a clinic to have facial hair removed permanently because he wanted a sex-change operation, a doctor said Monday.

John Mark Karr had his sideburns and hair under his chin removed with lasers at the Siam Swan Cosmetic Clinic and its branches in downtown Bangkok during four sessions from March to July, said Dr. Setthakarn Attakonpan.

"He wanted to prepare himself to do a sex-change operation," said Setthakarn, a dermatologist.

Karr emerged as a suspect in the case after telling reporters in Thailand that he was with 6-year-old JonBenet when she died in the basement of her home on Dec. 26, 1996, but that her death was an accident.

U.S. officials have been silent about what Karr told them during interrogations.

http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=2337664&CMP=OTC-RSSFeeds0312http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=2337664&CMP=OTC-RSSFeeds0312
Then he needs to ask for a refund 'cause he's still got the same sideburns from 1987.
 
  • #477
I stand corrected on the video. I mis read Scandi post. But I still think this is a Red Herring.And will till I hear they can place him in colo or have DNA.
 
  • #478
Buzzm1 said:
They aren't going to put his kids in the picture, (3, 4, and 5, at that time) and without them in the picture for a reference, it will be difficult to tell what year it is.

Buzz, I saw kids in the picture. I'm assuming they are his, one was a baby that he was holding.
 
  • #479
newtv said:
The charges that may be dropped are the CO ones..the only for sure thing is CA. If his wife proves his innocence thru an alibi then he shoudnt even make it to denver..unless they hold him there for questioning and charge him with mischief or whatever they can charge him with.
He will remain in jail thot because he skipped out on his charges..he will get more time for that and he may be considered a more serious offender until they can sort out fact from fiction..and I mean that even if he has nothing to do with the JB murder.
He may be in jail along time as they investigate his relationship to many children-all children he has come in contact with over the years.
If he is shown to be a mulitple offender he will be locked up for a very long time-especially if he is saying he killed kids-they cant take a chance that he wont take that step some day.
If at all necessary, CA can lock him up right now, pending his Child 🤬🤬🤬🤬 trial. No bail, flight risk. Plenty of time to investigate anything else The CA charges are, in the "now famous words" of Atty General, Bill Lockyer, a slam dunk.
 
  • #480
MrsMush99 said:
Buzz, I saw kids in the picture. I'm assuming they are his, one was a baby that he was holding.
If it was his child then the video is from 1993, or 1994
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
138
Guests online
2,951
Total visitors
3,089

Forum statistics

Threads
632,671
Messages
18,630,181
Members
243,245
Latest member
noseyisa01
Back
Top