That's a good point.
If the dog that found the remains tore the bag open, they might not be able to tell whether the necklace was with the remains or not.
We should also keep in mind that lots and lots of people of all races like Asian jewelry these days. It could have been anything from a birthday gift to a souvenir of a visit to a Chinese restaurant.
Does it not also state that the clothes were found outside the bag? Please correct me if I'm wrong.
On one hand, I was thinking that LE will not release if the bag was burlap or not. There were some arguments within LE that Dormer released that info in the first place after the GB4 were found. I believe it was Spotta who criticized him for that. Maybe this time they are keeping that info under wraps. We may never know if the new body is wrapped in burlap or in a bag . There was and still is confusion if the GB4 were wrapped in burlap or placed in burlap sacks. We might just have to suffice with LE just saying there is a connection to the LISK case. We can add 2 and 2 together and only get 3.9 . And after all the bad reporting in the past about this case, I tend not to put much faith in the MSM reports unless there is a direct quote from LE. And even then I am skeptical.
So, necklace in, necklace out. Body wrapped, body in bag. Burlap or plastic. I'm sure LE will not release this info. Frustrated rant. Sorry.