I'm not being silly.Don’t be silly. Bigfoot lives in the PNW, not the desert.
I asked what the theory was, and that is the only answer I got. I'd still like to know, especially as I'm not sure what link was being referred to.
I'm not being silly.Don’t be silly. Bigfoot lives in the PNW, not the desert.
I'm not being silly.
I asked what the theory was, and that is the only answer I got. I'd still like to know, especially as I'm not sure what link was being referred to.
I just did and I didn't find anything about a theory. Just a bunch of articles about how people have gone missing without a trace never to be found. But Bigfoot was mentioned in one of them.Really all you have to do is search the guy's name. I'm not kidding.
Aw, sorry, I was teasing a little. I thought the original Bigfoot mention was tongue in cheek. I’ve heard of “sightings” here in the Pacific Northwest where I live, but not so much in the desert. I’m sorry I sounded rude.I'm not being silly.
I asked what the theory was, and that is the only answer I got. I'd still like to know, especially as I'm not sure what link was being referred to.
Does the author believe in bigfoot or is he using it to grab attention. I think the CDC used Zombies that way. They wanted us to be prepared and get important info. This book sounds interesting does it educate people about the dangers of the wilderness, bigfoot or not?
In the article I linked in the prior post, there is a link to a website created by David Paulides (a former police officer with a controversial theory on what is behind the disappearances).
I've deleted the link to the site as I'm not sure it's allowed per TOS as it seems to be encouraging people to purchase the guy's books.
So there is no theory then?I have read all of the Missing 411 books, and Paulides is very careful not to theorize at all.
He doesn’t give a main theory but he provides some detailed information that shows similarities between many cases. Why does he have to have a theory? If he came out with one all people would do is find a thousand reasons to discredit it, which would completely undermine his extensive research. Sure, he may believe in Bigfoot, but what “theories” he does offer are usually when he thinks a stranger abduction is likely vs a mysterious unknown circumstance. There are SO many people who have gone missing in the areas he discusses and they’ve *never* been found to this day.So there is no theory then?
Does the author believe in bigfoot or is he using it to grab attention. I think the CDC used Zombies that way. They wanted us to be prepared and get important info. This book sounds interesting does it educate people about the dangers of the wilderness, bigfoot or not?
I appreciate all the questions you have asked, and I'm at that place of waiting, too. I hate feeling so helplessly defeated at such an early point in a missing person's case, but honestly, there's simply nowhere to go with this one. No matter what we may privately thinkHave posted nearly every question I can think of regarding Barbara's disappearance.
Going to try to wait, and will keep checking in if there's an update.
Thinking about her loved ones.
@K9Enzo...I have a TREMENDOUS amount of respect for SAR. People would be truly amazed by their abilities, especially in wilderness areas. How about carrying an severely injured hiker down a mountain, in a snow storm, while giving them life saving medical treatment until they can be evacuated....
Don’t be silly. Bigfoot lives in the PNW, not the desert.
What's the theory?
He doesn't have to have a theory. It's just that a previous poster specifically stated that DP had "a controversial theory" and I just wondered what it was. A simple question that seems to have sent the discussion down some rabbit holes. Let's leave it there.He doesn’t give a main theory but he provides some detailed information that shows similarities between many cases. Why does he have to have a theory? If he came out with one all people would do is find a thousand reasons to discredit it, which would completely undermine his extensive research. Sure, he may believe in Bigfoot, but what “theories” he does offer are usually when he thinks a stranger abduction is likely vs a mysterious unknown circumstance. There are SO many people who have gone missing in the areas he discusses and they’ve *never* been found to this day.
He doesn't have to have a theory. It's just that a previous poster specifically stated that DP had "a controversial theory" and I just wondered what it was. A simple question that seems to have sent the discussion down some rabbit holes. Let's leave it there.
Agree-I read it more like this.
RT started doing interviews right away. He may then have been advised by friends and/or family to get legal advice before saying any more to the media. This because of his situation as the last person known to be with Barbara, and with no witnesses to his account. He then took the advice of a solicitor, which was to make no more public statements, and he has stuck to that.
If there was any real hope of finding Barbara alive, I'm sure there would have been appeals, and rewards offered for information. If, say, she had disappeared in different circumstances, eg went out on an errand and never came back. But it's not the case, and the conditions have not been right for further searching in the desert.