CA CA - Bob Harrod, 81, Orange County, 27 July 2009 - #11

[suzyq211]

will family members be excluded from claiming any reward?

Eta: Yikes! Bob's family, not yours cubby!

lolol!!!!

 

[zwiebel]

Actually Cubby, I think you could lower your offer to 50 thousand, and still get a result. If the exclusion on the family's reward poster is anything to go on, that is:

'Persons who aid and abet the commission of a crime have no right to a reward. Family members or their relatives are excluded from claiming this reward'.

I really can't believe they paid someone to write that for them, but I think they did. Even believe09 couldn't have put it better, or more succinctly.

 

[Cubby]

Oh, I think I'd have to have an attorney draw up the fine print, but there would be no exclusions based solely on blood or marriage relationships to Bob.

I only had the powerball # in Sat nights drawing, but a sleuth can dream, right?

 

[Angelo]

Everytime anyone asks a question like that and I know the answer is, Bob's bio family, my heart just sinks a little. Even if the info is there, did it stay the same for two days running, is always my thought.

Re Mrs Harrod's home. That is justice doing what it is supposed to do, believe09. Thank you. I still find it incomprehensible that this case is being brought against their father's wife in the first place. What a waste of time, energy, thought and money. When all that could be expended on helping to find Bob.

Well said! My thoughts exactly.

 

[believe09]

Actually Cubby, I think you could lower your offer to 50 thousand, and still get a result. If the exclusion on the family's reward poster is anything to go on, that is:

'Persons who aid and abet the commission of a crime have no right to a reward. Family members or their relatives are excluded from claiming this reward'.

I really can't believe they paid someone to write that for them, but I think they did. Even believe09 couldn't have put it better, or more succinctly.

may my keyboard explode before I write anything that remotely resembles that statement.

 

[zwiebel]

Now I can't say anything for laughing.

 

[believe09]

Persons who aid and abet the commission of a crime have no right to a reward

This sounds like moral outrage as opposed to a legally binding statement.

 

[zwiebel]

That's true. I completely missed that. Mr Z has no legal right to put the tv on the football channel every night, but he still does.

So someone who would like fifty thousand dollars might not have a 'right' to it, but they could probably still claim it. If they wanted to do the right thing, and get paid for doing it, that is. I wouldn't argue with that. I might even congratulate them.

 

[imamaze]

Working on a new thread, will be closing this one in a few...

 

[believe09]

Good News-the people who participated in this crime can get the reward. Their family members are not eligible however...

Good grief.

I am going to jump to the conclusion that a non professional drafted this.

 

[imamaze]

Ok, new thread is ready to go, will be closing in one minute. Please continue here...

CA CA - Bob Harrod, 81, Orange County, 27 July 2009 - #12 - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community