- Joined
- Feb 4, 2014
- Messages
- 10,988
- Reaction score
- 66,682
JMO but I think whoever asked that question is missing the point. IMO she wasn't dismembered so that she could not be identified, it's MOO that she was dismembered because as d4vd has stated HIMSELF, gore > p or n to him. Also think back to his song lyrics, the videos, his bloody handprint shirts, etc. In my opinion, she was dismembered for jollies.Not sure if allowed but SF makes a good point here:
BBM
"One last point, again from the Medical Examiner’s Release: “The decedent was wearing a tube top and black leggings (size small). She has wavy black hair. Jewelry includes a yellow metal stud earring and a yellow metal chain bracelet. ”So you are telling me that someone supposedly went to such an extreme that they “severely cut up her limbs” as TMZ claims, yet the yellow metal chain bracelet somehow stayed on her wrist? And they supposedly did all of this so she could not be identified, but they left identifying items like her bracelet and earring, which can be tied back to photos of her and to whoever purchased them. They also left the leggings and tube top, which would now be collection cloths for the DNA of the person or persons responsible. They supposedly went to these lengths but did not strip her of her identifying clothes and jewelry?"
And I don't blame the questioner that his mind didn't go there. It's a sick think to envision. I only envisioned it because of the facts of this case as I know them.