Not directed at you, and this falls at random because I have seen it a lot in this thread…. It doesn’t sit right with me that women are getting blamed for letting these men into their lives. These men are GOOD at what they do. They love bomb and mirror and manipulate. They lie about every detail of their pasts and make themselves the victim. By the time their targets begin to see cracks… it is way too late.
Professional con artists, narcissists, abusers… men who need women to take care of them financially— that’s who is to blame. Not the women who choose to trust and have open hearts.
Not saying Rebecca is 100% a victim because she did some deplorable things too. But I truly believe Jake lied about his past and conned her.
I both agree and disagree. It’s nuanced. But just want to say first and foremost that in all events, nothing absolves JH from any blame — I never view blame as a zero sum game.
Getting into the weeds of your point…it’s complicated. Full disclosure, I stayed with and went back to an abusive partner many times. Some of those times, it was influenced by him blackmailing me, so I get a little bit of a pass there. Other times, it was just for emotional reasons. And this is abuse I experienced first hand, so I had full knowledge of the abuse. Is any of his subsequent abuse towards me my fault? No. Was I responsible for my decision to stay in the relationship, putting me in that position? Yes. Does that make me unworthy of sympathy for what I endured? I don’t think so — human are flawed and I think it’s normal to still sympathize with people who are in bad situations as a result of decisions they made (e.g. someone with a bad diet who has a heart attack) — but whether you’re deserving of someone else’s sympathy I don’t think it’s an objective determination.
I also have another personal anecdote relevant to your post. My ex-boyfriend left me for someone who I later learned was accused of physically abusing her ex-boyfriend, and there was a permanent restraining order against her prohibiting contact with her ex-boyfriend and his children — granted by a judge after a full trial. I mentioned it to him (the motivation for doing so was obviously complicated, but at least part of it was out of genuine care), and it turns out he already knew about it. He said the ex-boyfriend had lied (apparently so well that he convinced a female judge, I might add…the other witnesses must have lied too). I think he’s a damn fool. (But as acknowledged above, the same could fairly be said of me.)
To be fair, one very important difference between my ex and RH is that my ex is a lawyer. Based on some of the things he said, I’m not even convinced he read the whole court file, but I’m not sure whether that makes it better or worse. It’s not necessarily fair to assume that RH had reasonably easy access to information about the charges against JH independent of what he told her.
That said, I think you have a duty to protect your children, so I will hold parents to a higher standard. It’s one thing to decide to take the risk for yourself, but it’s quite another to decide to take that risk on behalf of your child (or future child).