- Joined
- Aug 6, 2010
- Messages
- 612
- Reaction score
- 411
Someone upthread mentioned he has the “shaken-baby look.” I’m more familiar with the immediate si
I noticed that he had a very distinctive look, similar to babies with brain damage, cortical issues. Unfortunately, children who have disabilities are more likely to be victims of abuse.
This child presents with low set, posteriorly rotated ears, thickened helixes / folding. depressed nasal bridge, sparse eyebrows with lateral thinning, and possible hypertelorism (wide set eyes). Those features are consistent with a chromosomal anomaly. 'Lazy Eye' can be present at birth and if it were observed by a clinician it would have been noted. It can also be acquired as a result of shaking. For the parents to state it is not related to any disability infers that it was acquired. How ? I don't know.Someone upthread mentioned he has the “shaken-baby look.” I’m more familiar with the immediate signs in the hours or days after a baby suffers such a trauma. Do we have any experts who can explain how this looks later on in infancy after some time has passed? Could it even be the source of his crossed eyes?
OP is absolutely correct in stating that children with disabilities are more likely to be victims of abuse. However, I can say with reasonable certainty that shaking is not responsible for this child's physical dysmorphisms other than potentially the 'Lazy Eye' , (but that doesn't mean that shaking hasn't occurred at some point).
*Unfortunately, clinical observations often come across as cold and dispassionate. That certainly isn't my intent here*