- Joined
- Oct 8, 2021
- Messages
- 2,246
- Reaction score
- 6,967
He’s not done. He’ll be back Monday.So - is Baker done - or is he coming back on Monday? TIA!![]()
I believe it is Baker's intent to not provide any useful information in his testimony.. He is being intentionally vague imo.It’s crazy to me that Baker has read transcripts and possibly watched previous testimony because he seems so unprepared on cross. Like he had to know the State had evidence about the burner phones purchase in Victorville and that they used the phones to communicate with each other while she was in Canada. So why lie about when you gave her the phone and let the State prove to the jury that you’re a liar? Same thing with the WhatsApp data. He had to know they had that information. Is he genuinely this clueless and unprepared about what to expect from the State or he is just using the hope and pray method? I’m going to lie about it and hope and pray she doesn’t call me on it?
Hi @Niner I believe Baker is back on the stand when trial resumes. Prosecutor had just begun when court ended Friday.
He’s not done. He’ll be back Monday.
I agree. I believe he’s being intentionally vague on most things, but there are other things that he’s flat out lying about. For example, he said he “wasn’t sure when he downloaded WhatsApp” but says he only downloaded it because he saw Monica using it ALL THE TIME and hoped he might be able to communicate with her on there. But when the prosecution presents him with evidence that shows Monica actually didn’t register an account on the app until a day AFTER he did, he acts like he’s all confused and says “something’s not right.”I believe it is Baker's intent to not provide any useful information in his testimony.. He is being intentionally vague imo.
Thanks @Niner. Interesting information in the article you posted. Here are a few items to ponder - a). How did Baker get the instructions for the dvr? And b) which one, Baker or Monica, says not to talk? I hope all this and more are emphasized in court.Instead of all the videos - I finally found an article - I believe this is for Friday.
![]()
Killer says ex-lover had no role in her husband's slaying: 'I murdered him because I wanted her'
Former 🤬🤬🤬🤬 star Robert Baker said he killed Fabio Sementilli because he was having an affair with the famed hairdresser's wife.www.latimes.com
March 16, 2025
While walking the aisles of Target, the wife was watching everything unfold on her mobile phone, police said.
Instead of all the videos - I finally found an article - I believe this is for Friday.
![]()
Killer says ex-lover had no role in her husband's slaying: 'I murdered him because I wanted her'
Former 🤬🤬🤬🤬 star Robert Baker said he killed Fabio Sementilli because he was having an affair with the famed hairdresser's wife.www.latimes.com
March 16, 2025
And b) which one, Baker or Monica, says not to talk? I hope all this and more comes out in court if it hasn’t already.
As the death investigation continued, detectives noticed the killers had removed the home’s video recording system, which wasn’t easily found.
I agree. I believe he’s being intentionally vague on most things, but there are other things that he’s flat out lying about. For example, he said he “wasn’t sure when he downloaded WhatsApp” but says he only downloaded it because he saw Monica using it ALL THE TIME and hoped he might be able to communicate with her on there. But when the prosecution presents him with evidence that shows Monica actually didn’t register an account on the app until a day AFTER he did, he acts like he’s all confused and says “something’s not right.”
If his intention is to help Monica with these answers, he’s done a very poor job so far. I wonder how much time he’s spent being coached by attorneys this weekend. It will be interesting to see if his questioning under cross improves any.
I believe the system guy said that Fabio had it on his phone as well (even though he never accessed it from there), so had it been disconnected, he'd probably get an alert and she wouldn't have been able to explain why the system needed to be off.
Thanks for finding this informative article, @Niner. I was surprised I got to read it. Usually, now days, LA Times won't let me read articles because I exceeded my free ones and won't subscribe. It gave me lots to think about.
Definitely wounds like Monica said it. Boy, does that implicate her... well, to me, pretty much everything implicates her as being involved. If she said that, how would Jurors not think she was orchestrating knowingly.
@TwinkieDefense, why did they have to use that recording system? Couldn't they have disconnected it beforehand? Did Monica really set-up her daughter to find Fabio? I have holes in my understanding, and some parts of the trial I didn't catch. IMO, she's just as bad, no she's really worse than Baker. Cold selfish heartless puss face.
*waves to Chelly*I believe it is Baker's intent to not provide any useful information in his testimony.. He is being intentionally vague imo.
I was wondering the same thing!