CA CA - Heidi Planck, 39, left son’s football game in Downey, dog found in Los Angeles, 17 Oct 2021 #2

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here’s the updated timeline. I did not include the second screenshot from the message from “Heidi - Mom” because I honestly don’t have a date for those and am confused as to why that contact is labeled as “Heidi - Mom” and the other message was labeled as “Mom.” The text string from “Mom” seems more likely since there is a message that is cut off talking about his football game.
I think it’s two different phones. One is JW’s fiancée and the other maybe the son’s personal phone? I’m not sure.
 
Well, they all have different contacts. One says Mom, one says Maybe Heidi Planck, and the other says Heidi-Mom. What is that about?
Plus dark mode is on on screenshot 1, but not screenshot 3... the screenshots were taken within two minutes of each other. I find it unlikely the settings and contact info were changed within two minutes. That has to be three different phones... maybe one is an older one that is used like an ipod?
 
Plus dark mode is on on screenshot 1, but not screenshot 3... the screenshots were taken within two minutes of each other. I find it unlikely the settings and contact info were changed within two minutes. That has to be three different phones... maybe one is an older one that is used like an ipod?
“Mom” text shows text Wednesday (10/20) at 3:05 pm saying please call me and “Heidi-Mom” shows text Wednesday at 3:06 saying please call me. I wonder if one was to her personal phone and one was to her business phone? Although, most kids I know would have used Mom Work or something…
 
“Mom” text shows text Wednesday (10/20) at 3:05 pm saying please call me and “Heidi-Mom” shows text Wednesday at 3:06 saying please call me. I wonder if one was to her personal phone and one was to her business phone? Although, most kids I know would have used Mom Work or something…
Good point. If you look at the charge status in the upper right, those two are pretty similar. Maybe same phone, two different contacts.
 
“Mom” text shows text Wednesday (10/20) at 3:05 pm saying please call me and “Heidi-Mom” shows text Wednesday at 3:06 saying please call me. I wonder if one was to her personal phone and one was to her business phone? Although, most kids I know would have used Mom Work or something…
Oh duh that could definitely be it!! ETA But the dark mode/light mode is still different... HM.
 
In the article it states they acquired this info from court documents, which I guess could mean it wasn’t necessarily “shared” by the ex, perhaps a click-bait title. I wouldn’t be shocked at all if he did though. He seems to very actively be connected and sharing lots of info to multiple media sources. In one respect, it does create more awareness. Moo

I feel like these texts read odd to me. Son continually references the ex as “my dad”, not just dad. “Im with my dad” vs “I’m with dad”. Still he’s a child and I can chalk that up to just terms he’s used to using.

The other text that says from ex to HP, also reads odd in a very similar way. Unless the 3rd person being referenced is NOT their son, it makes it read that HP is not his mother. So bizarrely confusing however it is DM. Moo

Also the first screenshot from the son where he talks about football, the contact info says “mom” and in the second screenshot the contact info says “Heidi - mom” and the text messages are from the same days but do not contain the same texts (if that makes sense)

Unless…. Was he texting her at both of her numbers maybe? Her work phone and also her personal cell?

Very sad though he sounds so heartbroken

ETA: I see others posted this same exact thought at the same time! lol! Looks like we’re all on the same page!
 
FWIW, Daily Mail supposedly has a copy of the MPR and says that it was filed on 10/21, not 10/20, but they didn’t publish even a redacted copy with their article to support this claim.

Sometimes it takes a case like this to remind me how much I despise sites like the DM and the Sun. They do cover these type stories more than other news outlets, but you never know if what you are reading is totally accurate, and I always feel dirty afterwards. JMO
 
Last edited:
I'm also thinking that she might have had an apartment at the high rise and spent time there when her son was in his Dad's care. Maybe she was supplementing her income with some other activities and her activities would go unnoticed in a large high rise where people don't really know their neighbors...

Yeah me too. She definitely has some kind of connection there.
 
Based on linguistic and semantical analysis :pand a look around the board of the monopoly like game history there at 3129 Helms aka Helms Square, I bet that the term “landlord” is being used in a colloquial sense.
MOO JMOO
 
Based on linguistic and semantical analysis :pand a look around the board of the monopoly like game history there at 3129 Helms aka Helms Square, I bet that the term “landlord” is being used in a colloquial sense.
MOO JMOO

I finally just read the full court documents. That would be a yes from me.

MOO.


Like @bestill says it's on Twitter, but I don't believe we can source the tweeter. I'm sitting on my hands for now.

Joining the hand sit.

I wish we could post them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
180
Guests online
552
Total visitors
732

Forum statistics

Threads
625,586
Messages
18,506,667
Members
240,819
Latest member
Lemonaid
Back
Top