CA CA - Heidi Planck, 39, left son’s football game in Downey, dog found in Los Angeles, 17 Oct 2021 #2

[Uninformant]

Boyfriend is not local.

That’s what I mean. Her ex mentioned they’d argued because he (bf) wouldn’t come to her. So maybe she drove to him.

 

[Coquette]

Your post reminded me of this - there are a lot of small boutiques on Melrose Ave. I'm guessing many are high-end consignment shops. She might have bought and consigned clothes there.

Actually, there are several! I completely forgot about them. What a great catch. I used to shop at several of them regularly. There's Crossroads, Wasteland, Buffalo Exchange, the RealReal, and Decades. They're resale shops but the really good stuff you can sometimes consign. The RealReal and Decades are high end. There are also Vintage clothing shops.

Wasteland

7428 Melrose Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90046
(323) 653-3028 Wasteland - Google Search

Crossroads Trading

7409 Melrose Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90046
(323) 782-8100 Crossroads Trading - Google Search

The RealReal

8500 Melrose Ave, West Hollywood, CA 90069
(310) 695-1795 The RealReal - Google Search

Decades

8214 Melrose Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90046
(323) 655-1960 Decades - Google Search


ETA: there are clearly some great spots for those who love clothing and accessories on Melrose. I'm a big resale person and love a good find. I believe in recycling what we can. Also, you can buy brand new things at some of these stores. So many fashion stylists in LA sell to them. I've seen them rolling racks in. Lots of models and actresses shop and sell as well. I can't tell you how many things I've purchased with the original price tags still attached at a fraction of the cost. If HP is anything like me, she'd know where the deals are.

MOO.

 

[Mimi in London]

New article! I’m reading now.
Ex-husband of Heidi Planck shares texts from their 11-year-old son as he is granted full custody | Daily Mail Online

This DM piece is making my head spin.

• Why bring the son to file the MP report. So the police hear the son corroborate that Heidi left the game at half time? Or so the son can overhear details that put a spin his mother’s lifestyle?
• What is that string of texts about red flowers all about? It comes from ‘Maybe Heidi Planck’, so either it is (for example) his new partner’s phone (and H sent the flowers to that person) OR JW did not have that number of Heidi’s saved in his phone.
• And something else struck me about a statement that is repeated in this piece. The bit where JW says H knows where JS and Co’s bones are buried. Knows all their secrets. Wasn’t that throwing Heidi under the bus somewhat, regarding the fraud investigation?

 

[SteveP]

I doubt he allowed it. Reporters will call the law firms, go to courthouses, etc. It’s awful and SO invasive. Let’s not be quick to pin it on JW.

eta for clarity, the texts were probably attached as an exhibit to his filing. The article makes it sound like JW “shared” the texts with them, but it’s likely just that they obtained unredacted filings.

You apparently are right. I will delete the portion of my post that implies he gave the texts to the DM. Thanks for the heads up.

 

[CharlestonGal]

That’s what I mean. Her ex mentioned they’d argued because he (bf) wouldn’t come to her. So maybe she drove to him.

If Heidi was headed to the boyfriend, it appears the boyfriend didn't know it.

"Heidi’s ex-husband Jim Wayne told The Sun on Tuesday that Na’eem and Heidi had an argument before she went missing and he had assumed that she was “ghosting him” when he didn’t hear from her.

“They had been in an argument the week before so he didn't know anything about her disappearance.

“He thought she was just ghosting him."

“He had no idea.”

Missing mom's boyfriend who thought she 'ghosted' him is Zuckerberg charity exec

According to JW anyway. We haven't heard from the boyfriend himself. moo

 

[Mistyjks]

New article! I’m reading now.
Ex-husband of Heidi Planck shares texts from their 11-year-old son as he is granted full custody | Daily Mail Online

In the article it states they acquired this info from court documents, which I guess could mean it wasn’t necessarily “shared” by the ex, perhaps a click-bait title. I wouldn’t be shocked at all if he did though. He seems to very actively be connected and sharing lots of info to multiple media sources. In one respect, it does create more awareness. Moo

I feel like these texts read odd to me. Son continually references the ex as “my dad”, not just dad. “Im with my dad” vs “I’m with dad”. Still he’s a child and I can chalk that up to just terms he’s used to using.

The other text that says from ex to HP, also reads odd in a very similar way. Unless the 3rd person being referenced is NOT their son, it makes it read that HP is not his mother. So bizarrely confusing however it is DM. Moo

 

[Rhibread]

"JW then continued, saying on October 20, '[Heidi] did not appear at school, so we became even more worried. (Son) and I went to the police station directly after I picked him up from school to file a missing person's report.

JW says he suspects the missing 39-year-old Los Angeles accountant's disappearance is linked to her job as he revealed that federal investigators called him to ask questions about her boss

On October 21, JW said he began calling her friends and her boss. He also asked the police to perform a welfare check on Heidi. A police officer went through the house with a body camera and with the landlord but there was no sign of her." BBM

Quote from the new daily mail article. I have a question that I genuinely don't know the answer to.. (this just struck me as odd)

Would the police perform a welfare check on a missing person? Would they not do it when the report was filed? Why would he ask the next day for them to do a welfare check after HP has already been reported missing?

 

[Ducky123]

In the article it states they acquired this info from court documents, which I guess could mean it wasn’t necessarily “shared” by the ex, perhaps a click-bait title. I wouldn’t be shocked at all if he did though. He seems to very actively be connected and sharing lots of info to multiple media sources. In one respect, it does create more awareness. Moo

I feel like these texts read odd to me. Son continually references the ex as “my dad”, not just dad. “Im with my dad” vs “I’m with dad”. Still he’s a child and I can chalk that up to just terms he’s used to using.

The other text that says from ex to HP, also reads odd in a very similar way. Unless the 3rd person being referenced is NOT their son, it makes it read that HP is not his mother. So bizarrely confusing however it is DM. Moo

It is a little confusing but might be the nature of the screenshot. I think too they have been divorced for a long time - maybe since he was a baby? And he might have grown used to referring to his mom and dad in a specific way. I know this was the case for some of my friends growing up who had divorced parents or complicated family situations. I’m an adult with separated parents and I STILL feel awkward referring to my dad as “dad” to my mom. It just feels weirdly personal.

 

[Rhibread]

Actually, there are several! I completely forgot about them. What a great catch. I used to shop at several of them regularly. There's Crossroads, Wasteland, Buffalo Exchange, the RealReal, and Decades. They're resale shops but the really good stuff you can sometimes consign. The RealReal and Decades are high end. There are also Vintage clothing shops.

Wasteland

7428 Melrose Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90046
(323) 653-3028 Wasteland - Google Search

Crossroads Trading

7409 Melrose Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90046
(323) 782-8100 Crossroads Trading - Google Search

The RealReal

8500 Melrose Ave, West Hollywood, CA 90069
(310) 695-1795 The RealReal - Google Search

Decades

8214 Melrose Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90046
(323) 655-1960 Decades - Google Search


ETA: there are clearly some great spots for those who love clothing and accessories on Melrose. I'm a big resale person and love a good find. I believe in recycling what we can. Also, you can buy brand new things at some of these stores. So many fashion stylists in LA sell to them. I've seen them rolling racks in. Lots of models and actresses shop and sell as well. I can't tell you how many things I've purchased with the original price tags still attached at a fraction of the cost. If HP is anything like me, she'd know where the deals are.

MOO.

this is making me really want to go to melrose !!

 

[LRinCA]

Maybe she didn’t do it and didn’t know about it. Or maybe she recently discovered it and that’s what she was upset about. Perhaps she was rushing to visit her bf to talk about it, since he wouldn’t come to her. Maybe she left dog with a sitter and left to go to bf and had an accident on the way? Are there ravines or bodies of water on the route to bf’s place?

The word ravine triggered the memory of another strange Los Angeles county missing person story. Four years after he vanished he was found in a ravine.

The Mysterious Death of Iron Butterfly's Philip Taylor Kramer

Editing to add more on this:

Philip Taylor Kramer - Wikipedia

 

[Knox]

Is the DM going to trickle out the rest of the hearing paperwork?

 

[bestill]

Is the DM going to trickle out the rest of the hearing paperwork?

I think so. jmo

 

[CharlestonGal]

Is the DM going to trickle out the rest of the hearing paperwork?

So it would seem. What the Daily Mail (and JW) chose to omit is interesting. Perhaps they'll post an article tomorrow with all the details they left out today? Gotta get those extra clicks however you can. jmo

 

[Knox]

So it would seem. What the Daily Mail (and JW) chose to omit is interesting. Perhaps they'll post an article tomorrow with all the details they left out today? Gotta get those extra clicks however you can. jmo

I agree and can't wait to discuss.

 

[Gardenista]

This DM piece is making my head spin.

• Why bring the son to file the MP report. So the police hear the son corroborate that Heidi left the game at half time? Or so the son can overhear details that put a spin his mother’s lifestyle?
• What is that string of texts about red flowers all about? It comes from ‘Maybe Heidi Planck’, so either it is (for example) his new partner’s phone (and H sent the flowers to that person) OR JW did not have that number of Heidi’s saved in his phone.
• And something else struck me about a statement that is repeated in this piece. The bit where JW says H knows where JS and Co’s bones are buried. Knows all their secrets. Wasn’t that throwing Heidi under the bus somewhat, regarding the fraud investigation?

I think the flowers text is between Heidi and JW's GF.

 

[cvaldez1975]

if you can get the court order / its available from court, i think we can discuss, but i could be wrong

 

[bestill]

I think the flowers text is between Heidi and JW's GF.

Yes. Another detail omitted by the article. Twitter has the complete court docs.

 

[Ducky123]

I think the flowers text is between Heidi and JW's GF.

Yes it sounds like HP got flowers for her (maybe a birthday or even Mother’s Day?). I don’t think we know when that convo took place - it could have been some time ago. The next text in that chain is the wife (I think they are married?) asking if she is ok.

 

[Gobstopper]

If Heidi was headed to the boyfriend, it appears the boyfriend didn't know it.

"Heidi’s ex-husband Jim Wayne told The Sun on Tuesday that Na’eem and Heidi had an argument before she went missing and he had assumed that she was “ghosting him” when he didn’t hear from her.

“They had been in an argument the week before so he didn't know anything about her disappearance.

“He thought she was just ghosting him."

“He had no idea.”

Missing mom's boyfriend who thought she 'ghosted' him is Zuckerberg charity exec

According to JW anyway. We haven't heard from the boyfriend himself. moo

I think it's a possibility she was going to see the BF. JW and BF can say whatever they want but they don't know if she was heading to see him or not. MOO

 

[Ducky123]

Yes. Another detail omitted by the article. Twitter has the complete court docs.

A screenshot of that chain is in the pictures section of the DM article. They just don’t discuss it explicitly in the text of the article.