CA CA - Heidi Planck, 39, left son’s football game in Downey, dog found in Los Angeles, 17 Oct 2021 #2

Status
Not open for further replies.
I believe she’s originally from Buffalo, NY. Her mother said she was expected “home” for Thanksgiving, so I’m assuming she grew up there.

Thanks. I did read that her mother was expected her back there for Thanksgiving. Her mom is only 61, I believe. She had HP quite young. I remain curious about her early life.

I'm sure I have missed her LinkedIn discussion. My apologies if anyone posted this before as I can't find it.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/heidi-planck-56b381117

Her likes this past year are interesting, IMO. One about women not sacrificing their voices and another about Ex husbands.

I know you are all way ahead of me on this. I'm just garnering more details to get more of a sense about the fabric of HP's life.

MOO.
 
This is interesting. It looks like she, or someone pretending to be her, is starting the entities and using services of InCorp.com | Registered Agent Service - National Registered Agents. They probably set up a profile with incorp that is used to generate and submit the paperwork for the entities. Maybe it was initially set up on mobile and typos weren’t considered. It would be interesting to see if typos are the same on multiple docs.
It’s all over the place. Sometimes it’s for the actual business address. Sometimes it’s as a manager. Sometimes it’s for process of service. Other times they’ve added a corp as registered agent (which is what I would expect, honestly. I think the use of her home address is so strange!).

If this posts the actual doc, this is a good example (and contains typos as referenced in above posts).


https://businesssearch.sos.ca.gov/Document/RetrievePDF?Id=200702310142-31193785
 
This breaks my heart. That poor boy. I personally would not bring my child with me to the police station to report his mother missing - that seems like a lot (and will be in his memory forever).
I agree, probably his first experience with LE. Not cool, imo.

The complete court docs for that hearing are on twitter, just an fyi.
 
Oh, my. So much in the new article to chew on, but, to start, she had a landlord for her house, so she was leasing, I guess:

“On October 21, Wayne said he began calling her friends and her boss. He also asked the police to perform a welfare check on Heidi. A police officer went through the house with a body camera and with the landlord but there was no sign of her.”
 
I haven’t read the business registration documents that have been referenced here. In what capacity is she/her address listed? If she’s serving as registered agent/business address for folks doing business in CA, that’s a legit service that would have her info all over documents. It’s also needed even more with organizations going fully remote and closing physical offices. I have to go through the process for each state where I’ve got someone on payroll, and it’s helpful to outsource to service providers who can act as registered agent and business address. Many of these providers offer digital mail, where they will scan and send you copies of everything you physically get in the mail. If she performs services like this, I can see why her computer would be a security concern for anyone using her services.
She’s not the registered agent. That is like you said a standard service offered when registering. She is listed as a Member of various LLc’s, old and new.
 
This is interesting. It looks like she, or someone pretending to be her, is starting the entities and using services of InCorp.com | Registered Agent Service - National Registered Agents. They probably set up a profile with incorp that is used to generate and submit the paperwork for the entities. Maybe it was initially set up on mobile and typos weren’t considered. It would be interesting to see if typos are the same on multiple docs.
This is the most recent doc on file for that LLC. So it’s not that it was used to create the corporation - it’s been around for a lot longer. I did notice that she’s using InCorp for process of service, and normally she lists herself. But like you noted earlier, using a third party for service is SUPER common and I would expect that. It’s strange that normally she lists herself.

That doc is a fillable PDF. Sometimes caps locks are automatic in the field. Other times not. But I probably wouldn’t submit something with all lower case and Angeles spelled wrong, no matter how minor the form. I just thought it was interesting.
 
FWIW, I have a Poshmark because I have designer clothing I wear once or twice and it's too pricey to donate. I don't need cash, nor am I 'desperate'. It also has a major community aspect, people get really into it. I wouldn't read too much into the existence of the Poshmark.
Your post reminded me of this - there are a lot of small boutiques on Melrose Ave. I'm guessing many are high-end consignment shops. She might have bought and consigned clothes there.
 

In this interview, JW is now stating it was Heidi's work phone that he retrieved from her home on Oct 20, but in previous interviews, it has been reported it was her personal phone, IIRC, because he said he was going through it, calling her friends and boyfriends. Unless I am wrong, this is yet another contradiction to what we felt was established.

Also, I think anyone would understand that her child is surely heartbroken about the disappearance of his mother, but I am appalled that the DM posted copies of the child's texts. What an invasion of the child's privacy! smh JMO
 
Last edited:
I agree, probably his first experience with LE. Not cool, imo.

The complete court docs for that hearing are on twitter, just an fyi.
Blurg. I kind of hate that. I always feel like family law files should be totally off limits. I have worked on cases involving (minor) celebs and the calls and sneakiness of reporters knows no end and it feels so violating.
 
All her Poshmark says to me is, Wow, she is a lovely lady with what seems, from pics, to be beautiful, healthy, natural hair, and she has/had some 16000$ in wigs. Wow! Not bad for a, whatever her job is.
I went through chemo a while back (in the Los Angeles area) and all I can say is this: she and I were running in completely different wig crowds - with the other possibility being that wigs have really gone up in price (like everything else).
 
Oh, my. So much in the new article to chew on, but, to start, she had a landlord for her house, so she was leasing, I guess:

“On October 21, Wayne said he began calling her friends and her boss. He also asked the police to perform a welfare check on Heidi. A police officer went through the house with a body camera and with the landlord but there was no sign of her.”

Oh, I thought that was known here. I found the rental listings for the property. I assumed it had been leased either for her or by her.

"3129 Helms Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90034 - House for Rent in Los Angeles, CA | Apartments.com" 3129 Helms Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90034 - House for Rent in Los Angeles, CA | Apartments.com
 
In this interview, JW is now stating it was Heidi's work phone that he retrieved from her home on Oct 20, but in previous interviews, it has been reported it was her personal phone, IIRC. Unless I am wrong, this is yet another contradiction to what we felt was established.

Also, I think anyone would know that her child is surely heartbroken about the disappearance of his mother, but I am appalled that he allowed the DM to see and share the child's texts. What an invasion of the child's privacy! Did JW really feel the need to share that to show the world he needed to get custody quickly so he could get the child some help? smh and JMO
I doubt he allowed it. Reporters will call the law firms, go to courthouses, etc. It’s awful and SO invasive. Let’s not be quick to pin it on JW.

eta for clarity, the texts were probably attached as an exhibit to his filing. The article makes it sound like JW “shared” the texts with them, but it’s likely just that they obtained unredacted filings.
 
In this interview, JW is now stating it was Heidi's work phone that he retrieved from her home on Oct 20, but in previous interviews, it has been reported it was her personal phone, IIRC, because he said he was going through it, calling her friends and boyfriends. Unless I am wrong, this is yet another contradiction to what we felt was established.

Also, I think anyone would know that her child is surely heartbroken about the disappearance of his mother, but I am appalled that he allowed the DM to see and share the child's texts. What an invasion of the child's privacy! Did JW really feel the need to share that to show the world he needed to get custody quickly so he could get the child some help? smh and JMO

Perhaps the confusion is because the calls get routed to her personal phone? :
(quoted from the article)
“I was able to retrieve her business phone from the home on October 20, 2021 and all of her calls get routed to her personal phone as well. Neither her boss, her boss' wife, her friends, her boyfriend, her friends, her landlord, (son) or I have heard from her since we las saw her on October 17, 2021.'”

Yeah, I don’t like that that the texts were shared in the DM for his little boy.
 
Last edited:
I highly doubt that the courthouse or a law firm would release the actual texts of the son to his mom to The Daily Mail.
It depends on how it was filed. It might be public. Idk. Like I’ve said before, looking at family law cases feels dirty to me, so I’ve avoided it thus far!
 
Maybe she didn’t do it and didn’t know about it. Or maybe she recently discovered it and that’s what she was upset about. Perhaps she was rushing to visit her bf to talk about it, since he wouldn’t come to her. Maybe she left dog with a sitter and left to go to bf and had an accident on the way? Are there ravines or bodies of water on the route to bf’s place?
This is the most recent doc on file for that LLC. So it’s not that it was used to create the corporation - it’s been around for a lot longer. I did notice that she’s using InCorp for process of service, and normally she lists herself. But like you noted earlier, using a third party for service is SUPER common and I would expect that. It’s strange that normally she lists herself.

That doc is a fillable PDF. Sometimes caps locks are automatic in the field. Other times not. But I probably wouldn’t submit something with all lower case and Angeles spelled wrong, no matter how minor the form. I just thought it was interesting.
 
Maybe she didn’t do it and didn’t know about it. Or maybe she recently discovered it and that’s what she was upset about. Perhaps she was rushing to visit her bf to talk about it, since he wouldn’t come to her. Maybe she left dog with a sitter and left to go to bf and had an accident on the way? Are there ravines or bodies of water on the route to bf’s place?
Boyfriend is not local.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
109
Guests online
501
Total visitors
610

Forum statistics

Threads
625,638
Messages
18,507,416
Members
240,827
Latest member
inspector_gadget_
Back
Top