- Joined
- Feb 9, 2020
- Messages
- 10,222
- Reaction score
- 73,384
Diagnosis of schizophrenia is nothing to be taken lightly and very often is heritable- it could have been heritable on the mother’s side of the family rather than Rob’s side.
This disease is widely accepted to be 80% inherited- but I personally think it is more than that.
This type of illness is extremely misunderstood unless you are a professional in the field or unless you personally know someone with this awful disease or have studied it.
I personally think the murders could have taken place less out of anger/ rage than out of paranoia/ psychosis.
Schizophrenics tend to think people are out to get them and they can either end their own lives or the lives of others based on their paranoia. They have delusions. Nick could have heard voices telling him to kill his parents.
It’s a psychotic disorder DSM-5 and Nick was in a psychotic state when he killed his parents.
I think Rob was likely in denial about the severity of his son’s disease and the danger- though maybe deep down he knew.
Also, he likely didn’t have the authority to institutionalize his son without the son’s consent. Those custodial papers should be signed but often are not.
This is a matter of what came first - the chicken or the egg- the schizophrenia or the drugs?
Drugs (especially hallucinogenics) can set off psychosis.
Sadly I think Rob believed the drugs were Nick’s issue when in reality the schizophrenia was the issue. (The schizophrenia came first)
It can present in a more subtle way by the time high school hits- forgetfulness/ losing things/ detachment and hearing voices. Many of those with psychotic disorders turn to drugs to “quiet the noise”- which is what Nick admitted doing during a 2016 interview.
It appears that Nick’s psychosis was full on if they were trying to adjust his meds.
If Nick also had bipolar- which I suspect- the antidepressants can set off a horrible mania.
I think the combination of mania and psychosis from his schizophrenia was the perfect storm leading to this tragedy.
Also, it could be days or weeks before the mania subsides and Nick realizes and cares about what he did. When he does realize what happened he will be horribly grief stricken and tortured.
Looking back at Nick’s 2016 interviews and knowing about his schizophrenic diagnosis - he seems much more tormented/ paranoid and much less smug.
His previous bouts of destruction were likely fueled by his psychosis.
The drugs were never able to quiet his noise.
This is a man to be pitied and institutionalized privately for the rest of his days.
He does not belong in federal prison.
All IMHO
I must start with a big moo moo... because I have no idea where to find a link to the discussion regarding Nick having done some podcasts after all the workings and the hoopla of the 2016 "Being Charlie" stuff.....
But someone was sharing information having Nick basically acknowledging that he was never totally sober, basically lying/manipulative behavior with his dad. This behavior, to me, is very smug.
I don't know how you twine "entitlement" along with "drugs" and with MH diagnoses....
I mean, how many diagnoses have there been? How new is the schizophrenia? Was he on prescription medication as a kid, before he started using street drugs?
ya know, its not like "chicken and egg"....
its more like "chicken, egg and salmonella", or "chicken, egg and blender"...