My opinion only, Nick was not treated affectively( not victim blaming, parents couldn’t fathom, didn’t understand). Press keeps saying parents did everything they could, not true! They mainly enabled Nick, by letting him come home on drugs, or stay when he was using. Sending a young man to so many 30 day treatments, only to come home, use again, was so foolish on the parents part, they didn’t know better. 30 day programs just give a very short window of sobriety, but usually not enough “tools” to stay sober, live a fulfilling life without drugs. That takes time, and a sober support community ongoing.
For chronic relapsers, there are 9 month, 12 month, even 1.5 year programs( see Teen Challenge, not just for teens, all ages now, plus many other long programs), with more durable results. The patient is given more and more freedom as they progress. It’s not about control, the patient does have to want it and mainly commit( counselors, peers help them to ward off urges).
it sounds like Nick needed to be around people where he felt he had some agency( not famous, super accomplished people who he compared himself with, made him feel small, insignificant). Many of these longer programs have people eventually write a resume get a job, go to job successfully, open bank account, all before leaving the halfway house.
Also, the movie, Being Charlie, was all Rob’s idea to try to get Nick to commit to sobriety, LOCK IN his sobriety date, when he publicly committed to Sobriety onscreen! Rob probably thought, for sure, Nick would not relapse after making a film and publicly committing to sobriety, press tour for film. Alas, Rob did not understand addiction, or even his own son enough to know that this would not work.