CA - Murder victims Identified as Rob Reiner and wife Michele - LA Dec 14 2025

  • #1,241
my prediction is that they’ll shave off his beard (and maybe do something to his eyebrows?) as soon as possible too, to give him a friendlier look! i don’t know if we will see him in outside clothes any time soon, but i bet they would put him in a woolen sweater.

personally, i do feel conflicted about him! i think it must be so hard to live with addiction and schizophrenia. i think he’s both a victim (of himself) and a monster, when you think of what he has done. i totally understand if people only see him as the latter, too and i do think other people should be protected from him, clearly.
Those tricks with appearance don't usually work. I was almost seated for a jury trial of a gang member murder. They brought him into the courtroom to see his jury before I was dismissed. They dressed him in a lavender plaid sweater, but he had the gang tear-drop tattoo by his eye and he glared at me. I thought he looks like a gang member in a lavender sweater. I read up on the case weeks later, they convicted him without me.
 
  • #1,242
I wonder if the reason he was asking people if they were famous is that he already had in mind making his name by murdering someone famous. Then his parents hustled him out of there and became the vicitms.
Moo...no I do not have schizophrenia but due to my own issues I frequented a mental health peer house. There was was one young man, his parents paid people to be his friend. He listened to violent music all the time, definitely living in a different reality. I can communicate with most anyone...but he was very rarely lucid. I guess you can have hope while they are young and 20ish....he disappeared but at 30 he was much more likely to be violent because because there is no hope for the parents
 
  • #1,243
Moo...I do not think you can put your adult or sub adult child onto a mental health institution. Cheaper for government to let uneducated loving parents deal with it. Or the kid just get kicked to street and society deals with it. I do not know the answer but mental health problems should not give you a break. Ya local gang banger has the intelligence to change...<modsnip- derogatory>...moo
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #1,244
Moo..I think that people with mental health issues that have caused mayhem or murder should be confined for life. Dead is dead, medication should not get you out...moo
 
  • #1,245
Looks lie the jail changed the date to today....

Court
Next Court Code:M30
Next Court Date: 12/17/2025
Next Court Time:0830
Next Court Case: 25CJCF0809801
Court Name:LOS ANGELES MUNI CT DIV 30
Court Address: 210 W. TEMPLE STREET
Court City: LOS ANGELE SUPT


link: https://app5.lasd.org/iic/Details

It wouldn’t surprise me if NR wasnt misdiagnosed. Were his issues more than drug (speculation) addiction. NR wanted the noise to stop. Did he ever mention the noise to anyone? He had issues since age of 15. His eyes are dead, nothing there, nobody home, narcissistic stare. Id say NR put his family through hell all these years.

Fighting with an adult at a party... It's all about him, I suppose.

I have no doubt his parents did every thing possible to seek help for NR. However, the person has to be a willing participant. The law is not on their side. Personally, I dont think he had it in him to do the work needed.

Using a knife is so personal. Did he hate his parents? I think so.

Mental illness, drugs and alcoholic, never a good mix, usually ends in tragedy; and thats not just Hollywood.

I feel so much grief for the siblings and loved ones, even though I didnt know Rob or Michele Reiner. I know this is happening every where, unfortunately.

I’m choosing not to watch it. It seems too soon to me.
 
  • #1,246
Just my speculation...perhaps he hung the sheet to identify which room he was in if he was expecting a delivery of something he needed to acquire that could not be purchased over any counter in any store. Perhaps he waited there as long as he could or was told to go wait where he was later found. I can think of no other logical reason to hang a sheet when there are perfectly good drapes that can be closed to block an outsiders view.
moo
I doubt he was thinking logically, having murdered his parents and reportedly suffering from schizophrenia and possibly being on illegal drugs.
 
  • #1,247
Schizophrenia is not something I would wish on anyone. Most random extreme violence aka stabbing on public transit is done by schizo people. The are just an accident waiting to happen. Maybe this situation will cause a public conversation. Many parents have adult children with mental health issues...and the parents or family members do end up dead.....moo
^^rsbm

While there is a slightly increased risk of violent behavior in some individuals with schizophrenia, it’s crucial to remember that comprehensive studies have long proven that the vast majority of people with the disorder (schizo people) are not violent, and millions go about their daily lives without incident. [A comprehensive study published in the Lancet Psychiatry found that individuals with schizophrenia were responsible for 6.6% of violent crimes, compared to 93.4% committed by individuals without the disorder].

Respectfully, while I'm not familiar with the statistics of violence on public transit, I believe OP's statement that most random extreme violence is done by schizo people, is contradicted by scientific evidence.

However, given that substance abuse is known to exacerbate psychotic symptoms and impair judgment, creating a perfect storm for potential violence. I don't think the abuse factor, or medication non-compliance, can be eliminated and/or ignored when assessing random extreme violence.



Epidemiological studies have long reported on the association between major mental disorder and violence, including studies that specifically examined the relationship with schizophrenia.

These reports typically find that schizophrenia is related to a 4- to 6-fold increased risk of violent behavior, which has led to the view that schizophrenia and other major mental disorders are preventable causes of violence and violent crime. Indeed, expert opinion has deemed that the evidence is sufficiently robust that new research should move beyond epidemiology and focus on treatment.

Conceptual models of violence in schizophrenia postulate that patients with schizophrenia are violent as a consequence of the psychopathologic symptoms of the disorder itself (eg, delusions, hallucinations or secondary to comorbid substance use (an established risk factor for violence). An alternative model is that schizophrenia and violent behavior co-occur because of familial factors (genetic or early environmental) that are related to both (eg, personality traits such as irritability, poor anger management, or inadequate coping with stress).

If, as we hypothesize, the association of schizophrenia and violence disappears when substance abuse is accounted for and appropriate adjustments are made for confounding, this would suggest that assessment and treatment for substance abuse comorbidity should be prioritized in individuals deemed at risk. It would also explain why attempts to find psychotic symptoms associated with violence have produced contradictory results.

Ultimately, the misconceptions surrounding schizophrenia and violence don’t just hurt individuals with the disorder; they create barriers to treatment, support, and understanding. JMO

 
  • #1,248
I’m choosing not to watch it. It seems too soon
For the general public who loved Rob Reiner, it’s a way to participate in Shiva.

May his memory be a blessing.

Amateur opinion and speculation
 
  • #1,249
^^rsbm

While there is a slightly increased risk of violent behavior in some individuals with schizophrenia, it’s crucial to remember that comprehensive studies have long proven that the vast majority of people with the disorder (schizo people) are not violent, and millions go about their daily lives without incident. [A comprehensive study published in the Lancet Psychiatry found that individuals with schizophrenia were responsible for 6.6% of violent crimes, compared to 93.4% committed by individuals without the disorder].

Respectfully, while I'm not familiar with the statistics of violence on public transit, I believe OP's statement that most random extreme violence is done by schizo people, is contradicted by scientific evidence.

However, given that substance abuse is known to exacerbate psychotic symptoms and impair judgment, creating a perfect storm for potential violence. I don't think the abuse factor, or medication non-compliance, can be eliminated and/or ignored when assessing random extreme violence.



Epidemiological studies have long reported on the association between major mental disorder and violence, including studies that specifically examined the relationship with schizophrenia.

These reports typically find that schizophrenia is related to a 4- to 6-fold increased risk of violent behavior, which has led to the view that schizophrenia and other major mental disorders are preventable causes of violence and violent crime. Indeed, expert opinion has deemed that the evidence is sufficiently robust that new research should move beyond epidemiology and focus on treatment.

Conceptual models of violence in schizophrenia postulate that patients with schizophrenia are violent as a consequence of the psychopathologic symptoms of the disorder itself (eg, delusions, hallucinations or secondary to comorbid substance use (an established risk factor for violence). An alternative model is that schizophrenia and violent behavior co-occur because of familial factors (genetic or early environmental) that are related to both (eg, personality traits such as irritability, poor anger management, or inadequate coping with stress).

If, as we hypothesize, the association of schizophrenia and violence disappears when substance abuse is accounted for and appropriate adjustments are made for confounding, this would suggest that assessment and treatment for substance abuse comorbidity should be prioritized in individuals deemed at risk. It would also explain why attempts to find psychotic symptoms associated with violence have produced contradictory results.

Ultimately, the misconceptions surrounding schizophrenia and violence don’t just hurt individuals with the disorder; they create barriers to treatment, support, and understanding. JMO

So well stated. Factual, practical, and compassionate.
 
  • #1,250
Very familiar with that defence around here, Mathew De Grood killed 5 people at a party, also connected And the Winnipeg bus guy that cut off a strangers head ,waved it at police through the front window of the bus. They say untreated schiz, can’t remember if that meant undiagnosed or just untreated.
Winnipeg bus guy totally came into my mind as well when I started hearing the possible schizophrenic defense they might use with NR.

IIRC, Vince Li (sp?) did go off his meds when he did the heinous crime that terrorized a bus full of people and included cannibalism :( The PTSD for all those involved and first responders I can't imagine. He was released I think and is free now... it's upsetting.

It was that case where my father who worked with criminals in corrections said that once people like him are medicated/stabilized and fully aware of what they are capable of when off meds - if they are truly remorseful, they should not want freedom or parole and if wanted to be accountable would stay in a mental health facitily to protect themselves and the public. What happens if they go off their meds again?

NR may be similar... And again, stats say schizophrenics rate for homicide is very rare and low 6-10% I think it was (I posted upthread) - so if NR is NOT actually schizophrenic, using this is a disservice to those who are. Just like saying being an addict was the only reason - that's a disservice to many addicts out there who would never kill anyone. MOO JMO
 
  • #1,251
Was a blood sample taken from NR after he was arrested?
This would show what drugs would have been in his system along with his prescribed meds.
imo
I'm not sure, I think someone else mentioned it's likely standard procedure to do so?
 
  • #1,252
I agree. And I think undiagnosed schizophrenia could far more likely result in a successful insanity defence than blame for medications for the treatment of it, whether changed or not. JMO
This is a really astute and sharp point . Thanks for this angle.
 
  • #1,253
i was curious about the state of death penalty in california, and this website explains it quite well..

“The death penalty remains a legally valid form of punishment in California, specifically codified under Penal Code 190.2. Despite its legal status, no execution has been carried out in the state since 2006, creating a decades-long practical inactivity. This inactivity was formalized in March 2019 when Governor Gavin Newsom issued Executive Order N-09-19, instituting an executive moratorium on capital punishment.”

“While new death sentences can be handed down, no person can be executed while the executive order remains in effect.”
I don't think there will ever be another Death Penalty carried out in California.
 
  • #1,254
For the slayer law to apply he has to be convicted.
<rsbm>

No expert here, but it's not that simple and more research needs to be done with respect to the specific law in California (both criminal law and probate law).

The slayer law can differ between states. Even with an NGRI verdict as a criminal finding, there can be a difference between that finding and probate considerations as to whether the killing was felonious and intentional. IOW, NGRI but probate law finding that the killing was felonious and intentional, it appears no payout would occur.

California Code, Probate Code - PROB § 250


Not simple, but thought provoking and perhaps needs more investigating.

JMO
 
  • #1,255
Typical of media coverage, there’s contradictory information out there.

“He had lived in their guest house for around the last five years, according to reports.”
I think BOTH of those things are true.
It's true that the guest house had been Nick's for about five years.

But it's also true that he had outbursts and relapses---and would sometimes be asked to leave the house. He would occasionally smash everything in the house causing thousands of dollars of damage, and be 'evicted,'

But then months later, maybe after a short rehab or break from each other, he would work his way back into the home.
 
  • #1,256
They don't always have to have a search warrant before going into a hotel room etc, if it is an emergency situation.

There was a violent killer on the loose---they needed to see if he was hiding in that room AND they needed to see if there was anything to show where he might be now.

They probably did those things and then got a warrant before taking any evidence out of the room, imo
 
  • #1,257
Oh I view him as both too but I don't know if the victim part is down to the 'monster " manipulating people into believing he is a victim when really he has engineered a life that enables him to do as he pleases without consequence or having to take responsibility and ownership of the majority of his problems

I get schizophrenia and MH issues are beyond total control but many suffers have fulfilling lives by stabilising meds , it would seem nick had a seething resentment that prehaps prevented him from wanting to stabilise in order to cause as much havoc and unhappiness to those he resented imo moo
BINGO. I think his resentment and suppressed rage kept him unstable. He could not pass a Rehab process because he did not have the sense of urgency most addicts have. He didn't have any worries about how he was going to support himself or his children, etc.

He had NO WORRIES. He knew he always had a lovely place to go and he had millions in inheritance at some point. He didnt have to get an education or even a job.
This comes across in the Charlie interviews, you can see the hate aimed at his father ,this is in my opinion an example of how Nick enjoyed watching others squirm and feel uncomfortable
He had so much vitriol that you could see it coming through his stare at his father.
 
  • #1,258
Then you read this and it seems that he had some self control. Conveniently as long as he got what he wanted, it would keep the outbursts down.

“He wasn’t stable. There were many times when Nick had a rant and it affected everyone … Michele would say to people ‘Please don’t upset him.’ The family and all their helpers would basically cater to him. The rule was always ‘Give him what he wants.'”

That is from this article
From that article^^^^---https://nypost.com/2025/12/20/us-news/inside-nick-reiners-spoiled-hollywood-upbringing-and-how-he-left-mom-at-her-wits-end/


TMZ claimed Nick had been diagnosed with schizophrenia just weeks before the murders and medication he took for the condition made him “erratic and dangerous,” with a source claiming, “Nick was out of his head.”

The Post’s sources said that seemed exaggerated. They claimed while Nick had ditched his healthy diet, usually a sign he was using drugs again, he had also lost weight. But they had not known him to get violent.

However, in recent months he was “not acting like himself” and it had left Michele “at her wits end,” sources said.




We need to unpack this:
TMZ claimed Nick had been diagnosed with schizophrenia just weeks before the murders....

Okay. , is that correct that he had just been diagnosed with schizophrenia in December of 2025?
That's astonishing, considering he had been in some of the most expensive mental health rehab centres, 70K per month---and no one diagnosed him then?

All of his life, never diagnosed as schizophrenic? It sounds to me like maybe the many years of drug abuse may have created these symptoms which were schizophrenic behaviours.


But then again, if he was recently diagnosed with Schizophrenia, before he was given the anti-psychotics, WHY did they decide he needed to take those ?
 
  • #1,259
Winnipeg bus guy totally came into my mind as well when I started hearing the possible schizophrenic defense they might use with NR.

IIRC, Vince Li (sp?) did go off his meds when he did the heinous crime that terrorized a bus full of people and included cannibalism :( The PTSD for all those involved and first responders I can't imagine. He was released I think and is free now... it's upsetting.

It was that case where my father who worked with criminals in corrections said that once people like him are medicated/stabilized and fully aware of what they are capable of when off meds - if they are truly remorseful, they should not want freedom or parole and if wanted to be accountable would stay in a mental health facitily to protect themselves and the public. What happens if they go off their meds again?

NR may be similar... And again, stats say schizophrenics rate for homicide is very rare and low 6-10% I think it was (I posted upthread) - so if NR is NOT actually schizophrenic, using this is a disservice to those who are. Just like saying being an addict was the only reason - that's a disservice to many addicts out there who would never kill anyone. MOO JMO
I don't think he was ever on meds before the incident. He was undiagnosed at that point, although his wife tried to get him to a doctor repeatedly, which he refused. He was being observed by a clinic at some point, but allowed to leave before they were able to diagnose him.

One of the responding officers died by suicide because of the PTSD he suffered as a result of this incident. Those poor people who had to witness that.

And yup, Li is now living completely free, and has changed his name. Great system we have! I think I really like your dad, though. Can't say I disagree with anything he said.
 
  • #1,260
Can you be mentally insane without having diminished responsibility as a possibility when it comes to sentencing
Yes! All that matters is your state of mind at the time of the act in question. If they can prove that you didn't have the capacity to understand what you were doing, and whether it was right or wrong, then that means there was no actual intent. However, you can have any mental illness under the sun and still not reach the bar of "Not Criminally Responsible on Account of Mental Disorder" (that's the Canadian term, so insert whatever they use in California here please) if you did know the difference at the time of the act, and they can prove intent. Having a diagnosed illness itself is not enough to meet the criteria for diminished responsibility.
More like "sedated", methinks.
Antipsychotics have a sedative quality, so they can achieve both simultaneously in this case.
Sidewalks and prisons function as mental institutions nowadays.
God, this is so perfectly said. Yup, for some reason we decided this was better.
.
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
63
Guests online
1,820
Total visitors
1,883

Forum statistics

Threads
637,038
Messages
18,708,410
Members
244,027
Latest member
malindayjose
Back
Top