In Canada, there is military school for students who want to join the military, and then there's military school for problematic teens.Military don't need recruits with MH problems.
There are very strict psychological tests as these people have access to weapons.
As far as I remember Bryan K. was declined entry to such a school.
Or was he expelled?
I'm not sure now.
JMO
... and then there's military school for problematic teens.
It actually can be a call asking for LE to attend to a situation involving violence. I've made these calls. In one case, it was DV incident in which I was on the phone with my patient as their spouse (who I knew had previously beaten my patient) was yelling in the background and then the line was cut. Police did a welfare check.
If someone suspected there was a safety issue, they could call for a welfare check, even if others are in the home. In some cases, the safety check would be for the other individuals and not necessarily the person having the crisis.
MOO.
Military school is not a juvenile detention centre. It's an expensive private school with very strict rules.RSBM
In my country such places are called juvenile detention centres, but the youths (till the age of 17) are sent there by Family Court in case of serious criminal acts
(e.g. robbery, rape, severe beating)
and there is a high degree of demoralization.
Okay but that situation would require a callout of an emergency response team (ERT) who specialize in dangerous and higher risk situations,
a bit different the traditional definition of a welfare check, to check on someone’s welfare because they can’t be reached by phone.
No, it wouldn't. It was a police officer, literally a welfare check, because there was no evidence an assault or crime was being committed.
There are all kinds of welfare checks is the point. But you absolutely can call for a welfare check if the person isn't alone or if you suspect violence.
MOO.
Yes, had to google this….By the way, I would not call wellbutrin addiction "not serious".
Thank you for your most educated insight as a physician. I was hoping that a verified physician or psychologist would weigh in here. So much of what you are saying I have seen first hand in my 35 years of being a teacher. I have taught many students who were bipolar and could not control their anger outbursts even when on meds. As a society we need to learn more about mental illness and we need to invest more in mental health. Ignorance is not bliss . Thank you again and I hope you keep chiming in here.Meh, it's not always a choice. There are certain medical and psychiatric conditions that could make it more complicated. In someone with years of drug use, I'd worry about how it impacts the brain, possibly damages the parts of the brain that allow us to process information and make choices. Picture someone with behavioral issues in dementia. They're not making a choice to be angry or impulsive. Their brain has degenerated to the point that they can't control it. Similar things can happen with traumatic brain injuries and drug use. That's not an excuse for murder, of course. I'm just saying that controlling temper is not always a choice.
When you add up: "you don't want to set me off" with told to leave the party and public argument with Rob, resulting in two murdered parents
... there's not a lot of doubt about what happened.
It's uncontrolled bad temper, not delusions or medication.
I also have not one drop of sympathy for spoiled, lazy, abusive, entitled killer.
Not one drop.
Neither do I.
Schizophrenia is genetic.
It does not express itself 100% of the time. There's more than one such gene and having more than one of the genes is associated with more severe episodes.
So yes, people are either born with the predisposition or they are not.
IMO.
Nick had tantrums as a child, and Rob used a bear hug to restrain him. He never outgrew tantrums, and still had them in his 20s.
In my opinion, that's a choice. He could use words to express what he is feeling, or he could choose to express his feelings by lashing out. When Nick is angry, he wants to be violent, and now he needs to be caged for life.
View attachment 633882
![]()
Nick Reiner threw ‘terrifying’ tantrums even as a kid: ‘So much anger in his eyes’
"He had so much anger in his eyes. It was terrifying really."www.aol.com
Hindsight is 20/20 and I am not suggesting they should have done this but when I grew up in the 60s, my parents would have not hugged me when I was angry like that. They would have either beat me or taken away all of my belongings and given a lot of time to think about it.
None of my parents children were like it although I was the one who did get in trouble outside of the home as an adolescent. They certainly did not hug me as a treatment. But then again I was not mentally ill which changes everything
Again, just hindsight and not saying his parents did anything wrong with such outlying behavior.
There was an interview posted upthread with Dr. Drew. He compared parenting a drug addict to being caught in a venus flytrap. As soon as parents consider the emotional needs of the addict, they are sucked into the problem and lose objectivity.
Parents need regular, ongoing, independent counselling and support to keep a safe distance from the addict's manipulations.
Rob's remarks, where he concedes that he made the wrong decisions with Nick, suggest that he is firmly captured in the flytrap.
I do. I think Nick's initial stint in rehabilitation was related to anger problems. Maybe he was smoking pot, maybe he claimed that he was using hard drugs.
Regardless, he was a 15 year old who was throwing tantrums, destroying family property, and probably posing a danger to his siblings. He had angry outbursts throughout his life, from early childhood to his 20s. That is the root of his problem.
You can in CA. It's called A 5150- 72 hour involuntary psych hold. LE will come and take them.SBMFF. Well, you actually can hospitalize them, even if they're not suicidal. There are dual diagnosis units all over the country who will treat people with substance use, including teens. But there has to be some other diagnosable psych condition, whether anxiety or depression or bipolar disorder or psychosis, etc. The question is, can they do it against their will? And that depends on the age of the child and on the state and their involuntary commitment laws.
As for a mental health clinic, they'll take him easily. Clinics are outpatient care, not inpatient. I suspect he was being seen outpatient as a kid/teen.
If a child is committing criminal acts, that isn't a qualification for a psych unit unless it's due to a mental health condition. Otherwise, it's a law enforcement issue, not psych.
That photo is chilling.Look at that 1 photo of NR and RR. If looks could kill. Not an iota of warmth in that full toothed "smile".