Now that this information has been released I'm wondering if Nathan was mistaken for Alvin.
As a child, if I stayed over at my grandparents place, I slept with my Grandma in her bed, while Grandpa slept in the guest bedroom.
It's so hard to understand why Nathan would be murdered but, if the murderer went into the master bedroom and either just started swinging or shot at whoever was there he may not have realized that Nathan was even there. Then when he realized, moved onto the other bedroom.
I keep grasping at straws to explain how a child ended up dead in this whole thing and this seems somewhat plausible.
My guess is that JO knows where Nathan would sleep and, of course, the DNA and blood evidence is going to tell the whole horrific story.
My heart breaks for this family,
Given the locations of blood, it looks like there are three distinct murder locations: on the stairs, guest room, and master bedroom. The victims that died in the master bedroom lost blood at the head of the bed, suggesting to me that they were lying down and perhaps sleeping.
If two victims were in one bed, and the third was in the other bed, who left "“a significant amount of blood” on the stairs and the wall next to them"?
Now that this information has been released I'm wondering if Nathan was mistaken for Alvin.
As a child, if I stayed over at my grandparents place, I slept with my Grandma in her bed, while Grandpa slept in the guest bedroom.
It's so hard to understand why Nathan would be murdered but, if the murderer went into the master bedroom and either just started swinging or shot at whoever was there he may not have realized that Nathan was even there. Then when he realized, moved onto the other bedroom.
I keep grasping at straws to explain how a child ended up dead in this whole thing and this seems somewhat plausible.
My guess is that JO knows where Nathan would sleep and, of course, the DNA and blood evidence is going to tell the whole horrific story.
My heart breaks for this family,
Could that significant amount of blood on the stairs and on the wall next to the stairs be a result of dragging bloody bodies down the stairs - for all we know, at the time the bodies were dragged downstairs, they may not have been dead yet, but incapacitated, and bleeding out. Even if already dead by the time the bodies were dragged down the stairs, isn't it possible that blood could get onto the stairs and walls on the way down?
Morbid question: is it easier to drag (say wrapped in a comforter/duvet or something) an incapacitated, still-alive person down a set of stairs, or a freshly-deceased body, or wouldn't it make a difference?
There's significant blood on the stairs, and on the wall next to the stairs, but nothing at the top or bottom of the stairs. If the blood was from Garland dragging bodies down the stairs, wouldn't there be a blood trail from the bedrooms to the top of the stairs and down the stairs, not just on the stairs and at the head of both beds?
There are drag marks from the side door to the parking pad, so it sounds like Garland managed to remove the bodies from the house without leaving a trail of blood, but when he got them out of the house, he left a drag tail spanning 8 metres. Maybe he removed them from the house one at a time using the bloody sheets that were left behind, and then didn't use the sheets after he was outside - thinking he could hose down the area.
What type of house was it? Wasn't it a split level home? 4 level? 3 level? Sidesplit? Backsplit? When it is said that "The officer followed bloody drag marks that went from the upper floor, down the stairs and out a side door.", by 'upper floor', do they mean the livingroom/kitchen level, going down the stairs to the basement/garage level? Or do they mean the second floor bedroom area going down to the livingroom/kitchen level? They had previously identified the bedroom level as being 'second floor', in contrast to when they said 'upper floor down the stairs and out a side door'.Deugirtni, I just reread the article and I was mistaken. There are drag marks in the house. However, I think that because the officer identifies three distinct "significant" blood locations, plus interior drag marks, the three significant blood locations identify where the three victims bled out. The officer's description of blood in the house (per Calgary Herald link posted upthread): Interior:Exterior:
- droplets of blood at the base of the stairs
- droplets of blood on kitchen floor [kitchen is next to base of stairs]
- significant blood on stairs and one stairwell wall
- blood at the head of bed and nearby nightstand in guest bedroom
- blood at the head of bed and nearby nightstand in master bedroom
- bloody drag marks that went from the upper floor, down the stairs and out a side door
When this happened I thought that a gun, as murder weapon, seemed most unlikely. Knowing that there are three distinct blood pools (stairwell and pillow area on two beds), I'm inclined to believe that a gun (most likely with a silencer) was used. I can't think of another reason why two victims would have remained in bed if there was noise associated with a prolonged struggle in the stairwell. I think it would be easier to drag a body tied in a sheet than by pulling arms or legs.
- bloody drag marks on the outside of the house that stopped in front of the attached single garage
- a pool of blood in front of the attached single garage
What type of house was it? Wasn't it a split level home? 4 level? 3 level? Sidesplit? Backsplit? When it is said that "The officer followed bloody drag marks that went from the upper floor, down the stairs and out a side door.", by 'upper floor', do they mean the livingroom/kitchen level, going down the stairs to the basement/garage level? Or do they mean the second floor bedroom area going down to the livingroom/kitchen level? They had previously identified the bedroom level as being 'second floor', in contrast to when they said 'upper floor down the stairs and out a side door'.
What type of house was it? Wasn't it a split level home? 4 level? 3 level? Sidesplit? Backsplit? When it is said that "The officer followed bloody drag marks that went from the upper floor, down the stairs and out a side door.", by 'upper floor', do they mean the livingroom/kitchen level, going down the stairs to the basement/garage level? Or do they mean the second floor bedroom area going down to the livingroom/kitchen level? They had previously identified the bedroom level as being 'second floor', in contrast to when they said 'upper floor down the stairs and out a side door'.
I have never believed a gun was used. If it had been, how to account for the bloody dumbbell? I suspect the death was by bludgeoning.
IMHO
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
<rsbm>There was a dumbbell on the floor in the family room. Perhaps it was the weapon, and perhaps blood was transferred onto the dumbbell when the bodies were dragged out of the house.
"Inside the garage Cst. Matthes observed two dumbbells in front of the parked vehicle and noted that one of the dumbbells appeared to have blood on it.”
<rsbm>
IIRC, the linked article I read stated that the affidavit indicated there were 2 dumbbells in the garage (not the family room) ... one of which had blood on it.
Based on everything else I've read on it, the dumbbells in the garage left me puzzled.