To me, it seems odd that they were killed and/or placed in the only area in the house with a security camera, which insiders may have known was turned off. Possibly points to killer(s) not only staging it as a murder/suicide, but also possibly knowing an insider who could inform on camera being non-operational. Just my opinion.
We don't know if the camera(s) there
Assuming the loans were made from one of Barry’s companies, the company doesn’t collapse if the major shareholder dies. A private company is a registered legal entity. The terms of any lending agreements would remain in place and according to succession planning, a new shareholder would take over. Businesses lending is much different than someone lending someone money on a personal basis. I think it’d be highly unusual if a clause was added regarding the death of a shareholder because in realty, the money wasn’t directly lent by a shareholder.
In a different lending arrangement, it was Sherman that was involved.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/barry-sherman-lawsuit-1.4506346
“Those emails show correspondence between Sherman's holding company, Sherfam Inc., Gottlieb and Shaun Rootenberg.
Gottlieb emailed officials at Sherfam Inc. in August 2015 to thank them for the promised $150,000 investment.”
ETA, and this BBM. His finances likely became more complex as years went by.
Endless court battles, angry relatives and shady players: the truth about Barry Sherman
“His financial interests, conducted through a web of private companies, trusts and foundations were so Byzantine that even he had trouble keeping them all straight. During his Rubenstein deposition in 1990, a lawyer asked him where he got the bail money. “I don’t know,” he replied. “My banking is very, very complex. I simply instructed my staff to have the money forwarded.”….”
Assuming that is the structure, the loans do not disappear if BS were to pass away. I am not arguing that. My point is we don't know the specific terms of the loans made to FDA. While I agree it might be unusual to have the loans forgiven in certain situations, it is frankly even MORE unusual that the loans were ever made to FDA in the first place. I don't think he had commercial or private lenders lined up to provide him funding for his projects. We don't know the terms of the loans, and/or their repayment requirements. And we don't know if these loans have subsequently been repaid or perhaps forgiven. It is entirely possible that the loans were made to an entity jointly owned by FDA and BS and that entity had a key man insurance policy that paid out in the event of the death of one of the two shareholders. We just don't know. So we cannot definitively say what the state of the loans is/are. Frankly, AFAIK there has been no press indicating that FDA is in financial difficulty, so I would be surprised if his allegedly significant indebtedness to BS and/or related companies has been repaid.